Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Opposed piston engines (Read 552 times)
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41908
Gender: male
Opposed piston engines
Dec 15th, 2019 at 10:09pm
 


...

Quote:
The difference is:
1. Full balance of the inertia forces and moments of the single-cylinder two-piston PatOP basic module.
2. Zero total force on the crankshaft main bearings from both: the combustion loads and the inertia loads.
3. Additional time for the injection and the combustion of the fuel, that is higher revs, that is higher power density. At the lower revs this extra time improves the fuel efficiency and the clean exhaust.
4. More compact engine: the crown of the lower piston almost reaches the crankshaft.
5. Lubrication quality and mechanical friction equal to the "full" crosshead version of the Junkers-Doxford. The two-stroke PatOP engine has "four stroke like" lubrication.
6. For a given asymmetrical scavenging scheme it needs smaller crankpin offset (less vibration and friction).
7. Built-in volumetric scavenging pump of lower cost and friction.


http://www.pattakon.com/pattakonPatOP.htm
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Nemo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16088
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Opposed piston engines
Reply #1 - Dec 15th, 2019 at 10:37pm
 
Piston broke ... the story of my life.  Wink
Back to top
 

Fire the LIAR in 2028!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print