From their manifesto -
Quote:Energy. Implement massive conservation practices; replace fossil fuels with clean renewables; leave remaining stocks of fossil fuels in the ground; eliminate subsidies to fossil fuel companies; and impose carbon fees that are high enough to restrain the use of fossil fuels.
Except of course renewables are neither "clean" nor "green". From child labor in the Congo for the cobalt to the mess in China for the neodymium.
Quote:Short-lived pollutants. Swiftly cut emissions of methane, hydrofluorocarbons, soot and other short-lived climate pollutants. This has the potential to reduce the short-term warming trend by more than 50 percent over the next few decades.
Now all we have to do is find a way to stop the termites and the mangroves emitting the dreaded methane.
Quote:Nature. Restrain massive land clearing. Restore and protect ecosystems such as forests, grasslands and mangroves, which would greatly contribute to the sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide, a key greenhouse gas.
So mangroves are good despite the methane emissions.
Quote:Food. Eat mostly plants and consume fewer animal products. This dietary shift would significantly reduce emissions of methane and other greenhouse gases and free up agricultural lands for growing human food rather than livestock feed. Reducing food waste is also critical – the scientists say at least one-third of all food produced ends up as garbage.
Animal products - eggs,dairy foods.
Quote:Economy. Convert the economy’s reliance on carbon fuels to address human dependence on the biosphere. Shift goals away from the growth of gross domestic product and the pursuit of affluence. Curtail the extraction of materials and exploitation of ecosystems to maintain long-term biosphere sustainability.
So those Congolese kids should not aspire to anything better; nor the Chinese. Australians should forego their wage rises.
And of course no more metals for wind generators, solar panels, batteries.
Quote:Population. Stabilise global population, which is increasing by more than 200,000 people a day, using approaches that ensure social and economic justice.
And this social and economic justice will be determined by whom?
And apparently Professor Mickey Mouse and Professor Dumbledore appeared as signatories.
They also don't define "uninhabitable", what temperature is "cold" or "hot". The fact none of the 11,000 helped write or review the IPCC reports certainly doesn't add any credence. But they did manage to get the facts wrong using the IPCC. Mistaking "Carbon taxes" with "Carbon prices" and others.