funny as watching Light & AiA go at each other.
Like the Odd Couple.

moon boots and moon rocks !!!

Moon hoax Buzz Aldrin reveals Moon destination

Yeah, well - I went to Sutherland Shire a few times and never once saw any proof that the first fleet had ever arrived there..... no ships, no footprints... nothing but a few signs that could have been just put there by anybody...

Maybe this Invasion thing is a hoax ..... maybe whartey never left the lend here or arrived to tek it over, bro  and lock the Koons out of Ayers Rock etc....

Politics of division - say, bro - dat a Whartey proof fence yo' got dere?

Bobby. wrote on Oct 26^th, 2019 at 11:28am:

Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN

look here first 10 seconds images you were never meant to see !

Published on Oct 15, 2015
A film exposing once and for all the moon landing hoax and the fake NASA Apollo moon and Mars Spirit, Curiosity and Viking Mars landings. This film will change the way you look at the world forever. The film was made because NASA are about to pull of yet another big lie (that there is life in the universe) or that the conditions for life are everywhere prevalent. Yet unless NASA come clean and tell us what they have faked in an age of CGI then we cannot trust them. It is very unhelpful to have blind faith in man without third part corroboration and even if it comes that third party corroboration cannot be trusted if it comes from other space agencies or countries who are also faking their space programs.

Astronauts are brave men and women, but can we trust NASA? Do they tell the truth? Are vested interests at stake? Was the Apollo moon landing a hoax? In light of all the latest revelations about water on Mars and possible life on other planets, can we trust the images we are being shown and the statements that are being made? With NASA recently sacking Christian scientists are they part of the 'progressive' atheistic agenda to move humanity away from a belief in God with emphasis on the materialistic model while imply that life is everywhere in the Universe. Many people suspect NASA are about to pull of another deception as big or bigger than the moon landing hoax and it is for this reason that this documentary movie was made. NASA have achieved great things, the space shuttle for example, although it was essentially an airplane attached two large fireworks which proved inherently unsafe. It would be wise for us to not get swept along with the progressive agenda in which mankind conquers all if that narrative is untrue or we may have far too much faith in ourselves to our own determent and self destruction.

moon landing conspiracy and the moon landing hoax which is sometimes called the moon landing fake or the moon landing hoax debunked and the moon landing documentary and apollo hoax proof or infact the moon landing conspiracy and moon landing hoax

13:25 is the Apollo 16 stagehand footage. Glen Moore debunked the claim this was a hoax but one additional bit Glen missed (the green screan Svector claimed he used does not include a shadow).

32:52 I have seen NASA apologists claim the reason the film changes speed is because they did not take much to the moon, if this is the case they will need to explain why it only speeds up when they are standing up or throwing something, but is on slow motion for moon walking and jumping.

43:00 In the film, The Shining their is a sequence which seems to imply he was threatened that he was not to speak out that he was involved in the filming of the moon hoax. Certainly that was in the intended implication.

1:48 this funny compilation was the great work of Paustal Service.

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/03/20/if-the-moon-landings-were-real-then-why-is...

If the Moon Landings Were Real, Then Why is NASA Stumped by This?

By WakingTimes March 20, 2015

During the cold war era the Soviet Union and the United States were locked in an arms and technology race, each nation wanting to prove their dominance over the other, each striving to be the next reigning superpower in a world still shattered by the second world war. The Soviet’s took the lead when in April of 1961, cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin successfully orbited the earth and returned home safely. In May, president John F. Kennedy made his special message to Congress on urgent national needs, declaring America’s intention to send a man to the moon.

“I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space.” -President John F. Kennedy, Address to Congress on Urgent National Needs, May 25, 1961

And so we did. In 1969, under the leadership of President Nixon, the entire world watched in grainy, black-and-white awe as the ‘giant leap for mankind’ was broadcast on television sets around the globe. Neil Armstrong planted the American flag in the coarse lifeless dust of the moon, and the space race was over. America victorious. Take a look at this marvelous achievement here:



Fast forward 45 years to a much more technologically advanced and interconnected age, where ideas spread like wildfire, and questions that have gone unanswered for generations are easily put to millions of people. One person’s ideas and understanding of our world can swiftly be supplemented by the knowledge of many others, dots are easier to connect, and truth is more freely revealed.

Were the Apollo moon landings faked by the government to gain political advantage at a time when it was not technologically possible to land a man on the moon then bring him home safely?

Many alternative researchers and skeptics of government and cultural narratives have put together a substantial and rather captivating case that the moon landings were faked with the help of emerging television and film technologies.

They posit that the government hired acclaimed film director Stanley Kubrick to stage the landings by creating a convincing movie set in a secret location. Evidence to the support the idea that the video is indeed an elaborate forgery includes anomalies such as the appearance of multiple sources of light in the footage, the flag planted by Armstrong seems to be waving in an environment with no wind, there does not appear to be an impact crater from the lunar landing module, unexplainable objects appear in reflection on helmet visors, the unusual slow-motion effect of the astronauts walking on the lunar surface, the lack of visible stars in the background, and more.

The footage is one thing, but many point to the existence of a dangerous concentration of solar and cosmic radiation that surrounds the earth as proof that Apollo never made it to the moon. Between the earth and the moon lie what is known as the Van Allen radiation belts.

“The Van Allen radiation belts are a torus (doughnut shape) of energetic charged particles circling Earth around its magnetic equator and held in place by Earth’s magnetic field. The main belts extend from an altitude of about 1,000 to 60,000 kilometers above the surface in which region radiation levels vary. Most of the particles that form the belts are thought to come from solar wind and other particles by cosmic rays.” –Robert A. Braeunig



In order for the Apollo, or any lunar mission, to be successful, the equipment and crew aboard the spacecraft would have to be adequately shielded from exposure from the intense radiation surrounding planet earth.

Robert A. Braeunig, author of Rocket & Space Technology has put together a compelling scientific refutation of the Apollo hoax theory, making the scientific case that the trajectory of the Apollo spacecraft allowed the vessel to avoid the highest concentrations of energy in the torus shaped Van Allen belts which do not fully encircle the earth. With the right trajectory, he purports, it would only be necessary to shield against the possibility of an unexpected increase in solar activity, something Apollo was indeed prepared for.

This makes sense and would seem to close the case, but for many the question still remains, especially so in light of the fact that there have since been no more lunar missions, and almost 50 years later NASA’s Orion mission is apparently just now trying to solve the challenge of the Van Allen belts.