Flynn News Coming Soon [30], Bread & Butter, [DS] KO- Episode 2032b

https://www.westernjournal.com/trump-reportedly-sending-kushner-get-border-wall-...

Trump Reportedly Sending Kushner To Get Border Wall Construction Back on Track

President Donald Trump points during a "Keep America Great" rally at the BB&T Center in Sunrise, Florida, on Nov. 26, 2019. (Mandel Ngan / AFP via Getty Images)

By Bradley Evans
Published November 27, 2019 at 2:49pm
Years after then-presidential candidate Donald Trump pledged that he would “build the wall,” his signature campaign promise may finally be nearing fruition.

The Washington Post reported Monday that the president has assigned his son-in-law Jared Kushner, a senior adviser in the White House, to oversee construction of the much-heralded wall.

Trump has put Kushner in charge of a variety of initiatives throughout his presidency, giving the husband of his daughter, Ivanka, a prominent role in Middle East peace negotiations, trade policy and criminal justice reform, among other issues.

In his newest assignment, Kushner has set up biweekly White House meetings to discuss progress on the wall with a variety of government officials, according to The Post.

The senior adviser also serves as Trump’s messenger, communicating the president’s instructions and wishes to staffers.

Among the president’s goals? An ambitious 400 miles of wall constructed by Election Day.

As The New York Times reported on Nov. 8 that a mere eight miles of original border fencing had gone up since Trump took office.

That eight-mile section cost $167 million.

Mark Morgan, the acting commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, praised Kushner’s business acumen in his new assignment.

“He doesn’t need to know the intricacies of the wall. He understands building stuff. He understands timelines,” Morgan told The Post.

According to “officials closely involved with the border wall project,” Kushner has taken on more responsibility in the details of the project, including the acquisition and seizure of private property.

Kushner reportedly has set a goal of constructing 30 to 35 miles of new border barriers per month by spring.

With the problem of obtaining privately owned land, however, that timeline might be optimistic.

In Texas, the Trump administration is looking to construct 166 miles of new barriers. The vast majority of that land is currently privately owned.

The president hopes to put up 450 miles of barriers along the border by the end of 2020.

In order to do so, the federal government will need 800 filings to seize private land.

https://www.westernjournal.com/trump-camp-blasts-google-muzzling-political-speec...

Trump Camp Blasts Google for 'Muzzling of Political Speech' as Danger of Tech Giant Becomes Clearer

President Donald Trump speaks about the impeachment inquiry during a tour of the Flextronics computer manufacturing facility where Apple's Mac Pros are assembled in Austin, Texas, on Nov. 20, 2019. (Mandel Ngan / AFP via Getty Images)

By Ben Marquis
Published November 27, 2019 at 8:33pm
It has been pointed out for several years now that Big Tech companies are biased against conservatives, and recent policy changes by Google will only bolster that perception.

The Hill reported that Google, which controls roughly 43 percent of the online advertising market, recently adopted changes to its policies that would effectively end the practice of micro-targeted political ads, which use real-world information about online users — such as political leanings and voter lists — to appropriately target them with advertisements they would likely be interested in and receptive to.

The new policy will allow political advertisers to target ads toward users based only on age, gender and ZIP code, completely undermining the huge advantage President Donald Trump’s 2020 re-election campaign had earned through copious collection of data.

A scathing joint statement released by the Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee, the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee, excoriated Google for attempting to suppress voter outreach and turnout in the 2020 election.

“Google’s latest arbitrary rule changes are a blatant attempt to suppress voter information, knowledge, and engagement in the 2020 election. These actions will lead directly to suppressing voter turnout,” the statement read.

“There can be no denying that President Trump and his campaign have built the greatest digital operation in all of politics, and that Google’s decision will disproportionately impact both the Trump operation and all of the Republican candidates and organizations that derive strength from it,” the statement continued.

“What’s more, given the growing and documented cases of anti-conservative bias in Silicon Valley, we are highly skeptical that such a ban would be applied equally to conservative and liberal organizations.”

The Hill reported that the Democrats’ national committees had issued a similar statement expressing outrage at the new Google policy last week, but while the impact of the policy may be bipartisan, it will be much greater on the GOP due to the disparity between Republican and Democratic digital operations.

The statement from the Trump camp gave a nod to that bipartisan impact.

“Millions of Americans rely on Google’s platform to get involved in our democratic process, from educating themselves on the issues, to becoming more politically engaged with candidates, and to learning when and where to cast their vote,” the statement read.

“By severely restricting political advertising, Google is stifling the ability of citizens to participate in our democracy. This will affect voters in the Democrat primaries as well as in the 2020 general election.”

The statement explained that the data Google has now restricted political advertisers from using had been offered up voluntarily by users as a sort of “please communicate with me” message that aided people in learning about issues, campaign events and volunteering, fundraising efforts and even when and where to cast a vote.

“Google is now arbitrarily saying this is not allowed,” the statement read. “There is no other description for this than the muzzling of political speech. Google is clamping down on voter engagement and suppressing voter turnout.”

The statement went on to note how Google has in the past “celebrated” its own role in increasing political participation and voter engagement and is now, in effect, doing the exact opposite.

With a nod to Twitter’s recent decision to prohibit all political advertising — a policy that will be difficult to enforce equitably — the statement said that “much has been made of Twitter’s equally concerning decision to ban political ads and suppress speech, but because advertising on that platform is ineffective and only a tiny percentage of Americans use Twitter, their impact is insignificant.”

“Google, however, is a serious platform with very deep reach across the entire country.”

Indeed, according to The Hill, Google and Facebook combined account for nearly 57 percent of all online advertisements.

“In short, Google has made an extraordinarily poor decision which will lead to less-informed voters, lower voter engagement, and voter suppression. Google should immediately reverse its decision in order to ensure they do not suppress voter turnout during both the Democrat primaries and the 2020 general election,” the statement concluded.

Trump “CULT” is Liberal Leftist Propoganda

and here's a photo that one one superimposed  Adum Schitts head on to KangaNongs Body

MUST SEE: Curse of the Akhenaten . . .