Australian Politics Forum - Determination by the Inspector General

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › America › Determination by the Inspector General

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Determination by the Inspector General (Read 143 times)

President Elect, The Mechanic

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male

Determination by the Inspector General
Sep 26^th, 2019 at 10:29am

Quote:

Description:

The DOJ on Wednesday released their report on the anti-Trump "whistleblower."

In the report the DOJ reveals that the "whistleblower" has animous against Trump and their entire complaint was based on hearsay.

The "whistleblower" was also found to be supporter of Democrat candidate.

Copyright:© All Rights Reserved
Available FormatsDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.

IP Logged

President Elect, The Mechanic Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17501 Gender:	Re: Determination by the Inspector General Reply #1 - Sep 26^th, 2019 at 10:29am See the Full Document... https://www.scribd.com/document/427431383/DOJ-Report-on-Alleged-Whistleblower-an...
Back to top	Q The STORM has arrived Every Dog Has Its Day... Dark to Light. Sheep no more. IP Logged

President Elect, The Mechanic

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male

Re: Determination by the Inspector General
Reply #2 - Sep 26^th, 2019 at 10:53am

Quote:

The “whistleblower” was wrong about what his/her accusations against President Trump:

The complainant alleged that he or she had heard reports from “White House officials” that, in the course of a routine diplomatic communication between the President and a foreign leader, the President had made statements that the complainant viewed as seeking to pressure that leader to take an official action to help the President’s 2020 re-election campaign.

The complainant described this communication as arising during a scheduled call with the foreign leader that, consistent with usual practice, was monitored by a number of U.S. officials.

Having heard about the President’s reported statements, the complainant expressed an intent to report this information to the intelligence committees.

The report alleged:

“The complainant alleged, “The President had made statements that the complainant viewed as seeking to pressure that leader to take an official action to help the President’s 2020 re-election campaign.”

We now know this is false.

The accuser was not on the call and made the complaint based on “hearsay.” And the accusations were false.

It was President Zelensky who first brought up the investigations by Rudy Giuliani in the call with President Trump.

The ICIG who conducted the investigation also found that the alleged “whistleblower” an anti_Trumper who supports a Democrat opponent.

9A1CC90F-1C23-4273-8E76-5F4679C2A2D3.jpeg (249 KB | 8 )

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.

IP Logged

Pages: 1

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page