philperth2010 wrote on Aug 20
th, 2019 at 7:15pm:
Quote:
Justices: Child porn is not protected speech. WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court on Monday upheld a law aimed at preventing child pornography, ruling a provision dealing with "pandering" illicit material does not violate constitutional protections on free speech.
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/993/child-pornography
Oh dear snowflake....Looks like your legal opinion is complete bullshit....What sort of cretin would ever argue child pornography was free speech (enter Lee)???
Poor petal. Just doesn't comprehend. I already said that it wasn't protected free speech. Censorship laws provide the boundaries between protected free speech and free speech. You can say and print what you like, even if it is illegal, but then you are liable to all and any ramifications.
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 20
th, 2019 at 7:15pm:
See above....You are wrong snowflake....Why do you continue to tell lies???
You don't understand the difference between protected free speech and free speech. Not my fault.
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 20
th, 2019 at 7:15pm:
No need to cry about it snowflake!!!
The tears are yours petal.
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 20
th, 2019 at 7:15pm:
Lee believes child porn is free speech despite it being illegal he thinks he should be allowed to keep his kiddie porn..
Poor petal. He just can't understand the distinction between free speech and protected free speech. His own post shows that.