Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Countries See The Future, And Its Not Coal (Read 623 times)
whiteknight
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9421
melbourne
Gender: male
Countries See The Future, And Its Not Coal
Aug 17th, 2019 at 8:47am
 
China and Japan see the future, and it’s not coal: why Australia will be stranded

August 17, 2019
The Age


Scott Morrison was a lone voice at the Pacific Islands Forum in Tuvalu this week as his government  warned that any condemnation of coal, or calls for a ban on new mines, were a ‘‘red-line issue’’. It may be that Beijing sees things differently.   Sad


The fact is, Australia might only have a decade left to wean itself off coal if the latest international efforts to decarbonise are anything to go by.

The demand for coal from some of Australia’s main thermal coal export markets, specifically China and Japan, is in decline. Both major economies are rapidly transitioning to clean technology.

The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) reports that China is taking the lead in the clean energy race to become the world’s largest producer, exporter and installer of solar panels, wind turbines, batteries and electric vehicles.   Smiley


Despite forecasts that China will continue to consume about half the world’s coal until 2023, the country has spent more on renewable energy than any other country and led a campaign to burn gas instead of coal in its battle against pollution. It has already promised to launch a series of solar and wind projects that can provide electricity at the same price as coal-fired power.

China’s investment from January to March this year in thermal power plants, which mostly consist of coal-fired generators, slumped 30 per cent from a year earlier. In contrast, spending on hydro-power and wind-power projects rose 48 per cent and 30 per cent respectively. Most of the capital expenditure planned by coal-fired power companies will be in renewable energy.

A push to a cleaner economy is also visible in Japan.   Smiley

With a traditional high reliance on coal-powered generation, Japan is shifting away from new coal-fired projects. Several large utility companies, Osaka Gas, Kyushu Electric Power, Tokyo Gas, Idelmitsu Kosa and Chugoku Electric Power, are scrapping their plans for coal-fired power.

These cancellations come as renewable energy is on the rise in Japan and as the government brings in stricter regulations on new coal-fired power plants as part of its energy outlook. Coal power generation is expected to fall to 281 billion kilowatt hours in the 2030 financial year, down from 346 billion kWh in 2017.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, one of Japan’s largest banks, is reviewing its lending policies for coal-fired power generation. It is said to be guided by OECD standards to lend only to “high-efficiency, ultra-supercritical” coal-fired power plants.

As one of Japan’s biggest suppliers of thermal coal, this fall in demand will significantly hit Australia’s coal export market in the long-term.

There is certainly a reason to continue to rely on coal in the short term to ensure the reliability of power supplies. Given China’s enormous power needs, it is allowing 11 provinces and regions to resume building coal power plants. And the closure date of AGL’s Liddell power plant in NSW’s Hunter Valley has been pushed back by four months.

However, a Macquarie Business School research paper, “How markets will drive the transition to a low-carbon economy”, shows that the long-term business case for new coal projects no longer exists, domestically or globally.

Our research shows the total global wealth creation by 2050 through the development of clean technology patents in areas such as bio-fuels, fuel cells, hydro energy, wind energy, solar energy, and geothermal energy is $13.69 trillion to $20.87 trillion.

China has a clear lead in terms of the underlying technology with over 150,000 renewable energy patents as of 2016. This amounts to 29 per cent of the global total. The next closest country is the US, which has a little over 100,000 patents. Japan and the EU have closer to 75,000 patents each.

While not all patents are useful or valuable, these figures give an indication of how much investment different countries have been putting into clean technology.

The point to realise is that the global transition to renewables means our investments in coal are likely to become “stranded” and eventually these will need to be written down.

But such transitioning takes time, leadership and policy.

Germany’s transition to a low-carbon economy with its “Energiewende” has taken 30 years. It will decommission all its coal plants by 2038. Beijing has stated its intention to clean up its polluted cities, so it will increasingly turn to cleantech for its power supply to improve air quality.

Countries such as China ad Japan – our significant coal customers – see the future, and it’s not coal.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 122085
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Countries See The Future, And Its Not Coal
Reply #1 - Aug 17th, 2019 at 8:49am
 
Thanks sir Crook,

When the Hazelwood power station was running
in the Latrobe valley it put out mega amounts of brown smog:

...


https://www.thefifthestate.com.au/education/harvard-calculates-health-and-enviro...


Victorian coal power stations are causing billions of dollars of health and environmental damage, research out of Harvard University has found.

The new figures, released by Environment Victoria, are based on the externalised social costs for electricity generators in Victoria, and estimate that brown coal generators in the Latrobe Valley are each causing between $500 million and $1.2 billion dollars worth of damage a year.

“It has been known for a long time that burning coal causes health and environmental damage, but this is the first time research has attempted to quantify that cost in Victoria,” Environment Victoria Safe Climate campaign manager Dr Nicholas Aberle said.

“At Anglesea, where the biggest problem is the sulphur dioxide, we see health costs of $170 million per year from a very small, and now redundant, power station.”

Dr Aberle said many of Victoria’s power stations were operating past their use-by date.

“They’ve got every incentive to hold on because they’re cheap to run, but they’re not paying for any of the pollution or damage they create,” he said.

This was a market failure that was preventing a shift to cleaner generation, he said.

The research was spurred by 2014’s Hazelwood mine fire disaster, which covered towns like Morwell in a thick blanket of smog.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
whiteknight
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9421
melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Countries See The Future, And Its Not Coal
Reply #2 - Aug 17th, 2019 at 8:55am
 
Yes good on you Bobby, coal is not the way to go.   Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 122085
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Countries See The Future, And Its Not Coal
Reply #3 - Aug 17th, 2019 at 9:04am
 
whiteknight wrote on Aug 17th, 2019 at 8:55am:
Yes good on you Bobby, coal is not the way to go.   Smiley



Yes - hopefully we'll get solar molten salt thermal power
or other renewables to replace it.
Perhaps we can have safe Thorium or fusion power too?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21533
Gender: male
Re: Countries See The Future, And Its Not Coal
Reply #4 - Aug 17th, 2019 at 12:33pm
 
"As of March 2019, China has 46 nuclear reactors in operation with a capacity of 42.8 GW and 11 under construction with a capacity of 10.8 GW.[3][4] Additional reactors are planned for an additional 36 GW. China was planning to have 58 GW of capacity by 2020.[5] However, few plants have commenced construction since 2015, and it is now unlikely that this target will be met.[6]

China ranks third in the world in total nuclear power capacity installed. Around one tenth of global nuclear power is generated in China. Nuclear power contributed 4.2% of the total Chinese electricity production in 2018, with 294.4 TWh.[1] This is an increase from 3.9% and 247 TWh in 2017.[5]

Due to increasing concerns about air quality, climate change and fossil fuel shortages, nuclear power has been looked into as an alternative to coal.[7][8] China's National Development and Reform Commission has indicated the intention to raise the percentage of China's electricity produced by nuclear power from the current 3% to 6% by 2020 (compared to 20% in the United States and 74% in France).[9][failed verification] More long-term plans for future capacity are 120-150 GW by 2030."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_China

"By the end of 2018, the country had a total capacity of 728 GW of renewable power, mainly from hydroelectric and wind power."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_energy_in_China

About 26.5% was renewable including hydro. With Solar and Wind generating about 7%, nameplate of course.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print