philperth2010 wrote on Aug 17
th, 2019 at 4:17am:
I am not trying to find anything snowflake...
That much is obvious. You are just a true believer.
You BELIEVE you can find 3mm of SLR out of an accuracy of about 33mm.
You BELIEVE that you can possibly see a 150 year spike in CO2 out of a resolution of 1500 years. You have to believe that if you believe it hasn't happened in any of the last interglacials. Plant stomata data shows higher levels of CO2 than ice core data from a couple of hundred years ago. If high resolution plant stomata data can show that and ice cores don't; it says a lot about the resolution of the ice cores.
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 17
th, 2019 at 4:17am:
I do not work for NASA and have not contributed to any of their research.
You do not show any propensity to work for any remotely scientific organisation.
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 17
th, 2019 at 4:17am:
It would be you who is tying to find fault with NASA's methodology.
Nope. I am merely pointing out discrepancies.
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 17
th, 2019 at 4:17am:
NASA has gone to the moon..
Did they. I thought NASA stayed behind and the astronauts went.

BTW - is that the same NASA that killed a few astronauts? Something to do with faulty safety checks if I recall correctly.
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 17
th, 2019 at 4:17am:
What have you done to declare you know more than NASA
Where have I declared that?
philperth2010 wrote on Aug 17
th, 2019 at 4:17am:
You are an idiot snowflake???
Obviously not as big an idiot as you.
What is the big problem with current CO2? With references please. But not Readers Digest.