philperth2010 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2019 at 5:45pm:


Poor petal. The first link, which I gave, was to "https://www.eumetsat.int/jason/print.htm " which was about the accuracy of the satellite altimeters generally and Jason 2 specifically.

The second which I also, gave was to NASA about the accuracy of Jason 3 specifically.

I had previously said the accuracy was about 34mm.

But perhaps phil doesn't realise the link is the URL. But perhaps he merely didn't know that. Edit: i just read back and both were linked correctly.

philperth2010 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2019 at 5:45pm:


It proves the accuracy of the altimeters, should you care to look. Or you can do a "Control F" and search for the accuracy or even the phrase provided.

Now seeing that the claimed SLR is in the vicinity of 3mm per/year perhaps you can show how it can possibly be derived when the native accuracy of the alitmeters is of about 34mm (3.4cm).

We know the level of your scientific understanding when you can't even cite references properly. 

philperth2010 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2019 at 6:19pm:



Ooh look they use satellites. With altimeters . And the altimeters have an accuracy 10 times  the postulated SLR.

Too funny.

You do understand the difference between 3mm and 3.3cm (34mm)?

philperth2010 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2019 at 6:19pm:



Poor petal deleted this post. How embarrassing for him.

lee wrote on Aug 16^th, 2019 at 6:23pm:



Worthless dribble....Look at what NASA says about global warming snowflake and educate yourself!!!



https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

lee wrote on Aug 16^th, 2019 at 6:44pm:


Where have I said any such thing snowflake???

So you do not deny the planet is warming and you do not deny sea levels are rising....Do you believe it is being caused by CO2???

Because NASA believes the planet is warming and explains it's findings in the link provided with URL!!!

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Sir lastnail wrote on Aug 13^th, 2019 at 11:30pm:


These two-bit little islanders are not giving any lip to China in their attempt at a cash grab from Oz.


Climate change - what a dam POLITICAL and FINANCIAL hoax.

The Scientists just want you to believe it's 'un-natural' so they can get paid for fixing it and playing 'God'.

Domesticate the 'wild' animal. 

philperth2010 wrote on Aug 16^th, 2019 at 9:18pm:


That's for you to decide.

Land temperatures going back to the late 1800's are very sparse.

Ocean temperatures going back that far are far more sparse.

Ocean temperatures for the Southern Hemisphere up to about 1950 are beyond a joke.

"Data from the Southern Hemisphere, particularly south of latitude 30 south, are so meager that reliable conclusions are not possible, the report says."

https://www.nytimes.com/1978/01/05/archives/international-team-of-specialists-fi...

And that was in 1978.

Now seeing as the Southern Ocean has more water than the Northern hemisphere, it as a greater role to play in the oceanic temperatures. And they form part of the global temperature. So really anything before about 1950 is laughable. But i will let you believe what you want.

You could just have easily asked is NOAA lying about SLR? I have pointed out the discrepancy. And I will let you sort that out too.

BTW- Your graph of those thousands of years of CO2 have a resolution of about 1500 years from memory and you are trying to find a small increase in CO2 in a short timeframe.

Bye petal.