Grappler Racist Filth
Gold Member
Offline
Australian Politics
Posts: 90518
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: 
|
mothra wrote on May 4 th, 2019 at 5:56pm: Grappler Racist Filth wrote on May 4 th, 2019 at 5:50pm: mothra wrote on May 4 th, 2019 at 5:41pm: Grappler Racist Filth wrote on May 4 th, 2019 at 5:20pm: mothra wrote on May 4 th, 2019 at 5:15pm: Grappler Racist Filth wrote on May 4 th, 2019 at 5:13pm: mothra wrote on May 4 th, 2019 at 3:55pm: Grappler Racist Filth wrote on May 4 th, 2019 at 3:35pm: "The difference between my organisation, myself and him [Tarrant], is simply that we believe, certainly at this stage, that there is a peaceful solution for us to create the society we want to live in"
Interesting - let me put my great mind on to this .......
a. the group is currently pursuing peaceful solutions
b. this does not mean it will not escalate into violent solutions
c. a separate but parallel society of 'whites' is viewed in an entirely different way than is a society of Arabs, or Indigenous, or similar...
d. 'approved' groups are therefore entitled to pursue 'their own way'... but to advocate that a 'white' (thus far undefined) group attempt to do so means they are 'extreme', whereas ghettoes, demands for separate laws, etc are not 'extreme'....
Truly we live in interesting times....
It is Inevitable™ that some response develop to never-ending policies of division, exclusion and preference...
Yes, i thought you'd be able to relate to them. Why do you have such extreme (sic) difficulty differentiating between analysis and discussion and support? Is it because you are a flawed emotion driven organism and thus have no real place in academia, where a small amount of knowledge in the wrong mind can be a dangerous thing? Because you consistently only accept mitigation from one group. That's this one. You're most critical of all others. Where, in there, is there any 'mitigation'? There is only comparison... and ultimately condemnation... I repeat:- Why do you have such extreme (sic) difficulty differentiating between analysis and discussion and support? Is it because you are a flawed emotion driven organism and thus have no real place in academia, where a small amount of knowledge in the wrong mind can be a dangerous thing? FYI - when I went through the ASIO certain section within the Attorney General's department recruiting process, some years ago (unspecified number - outcome unspecified) it was actually on the basis of the rise of right wing groups within this nation... need I go further for you?  The issue is far more complex than you even begin to understand.... Oh pull the other one. Hiding behind the pursuit of academic enquiry are you? You wo';t even accept that demographics other than your own have reason to speak, let alone have their voices heard. Where did I ever say that? Indeed the shoe is on the other foot, since it is the 'PC left' that seeks perpetually to preclude any discussion from certain groups of genuine stakeholders.. the groups I call The Silenced Majority... Stalin would be proud of you .... those enemies of the state must not be permitted a voice in discussion of issues pertaining to them directly.... they must obey without question the commands of the State and its Kommissars or be eliminated ... Why do you have such difficulty differentiating between pen discussion and some demand that other groups be silenced? Is a free and open discussion a threat to your worldview or to yourself personally? JFK said differently.... one guarantee of a free society is free and open discussion... I've never demanded that Muslims, for example, be gagged from discussing the tenets of their religion - just that they not proclaim death to all others ... I most certainly have never said that Indigenes should be silenced... in fact, I've advocated for ages an Indigenous minister for their affairs and possibly an Indigenous PM etc... anyway, both of those groups, as examples only of the situation, have countless voices out there for their issues... Clearly it is not they being gagged and prevented from discussion ... When you claim oppression as your groundpiece for your philosophy - you need to be sure of what that oppression actually is and how it actually works... When has anyone ever stopped free and open discussion? It's everywhere! Everyone has an opinion and through social media, everyone can make it heard. I saw some debate the other day with Jordan Peterson and some other dude compared to Foucault vs Chomsky. I laughed out loud. What you're not supposed to do is vilify. You're not supposed to spread hate speech. You're not supposed to refer to groups by negative stereotypes and refer to them as pejoratives. Yet you think this an infringement on your rights speaks more to your mindset than even my previous observations of you in this thread. Off you go again - where have I ever supported hate speech? I have, at times pointed out where Hate Speech is routinely used without censure by some groups, such as head loppers and Australia burners with their silly antics about hating white Australia etc... do you have a problem with that? When, for example, do men's groups get an equal seat at the table in discussion of such things as family violence.. when do non-partisan Australians get an equal seat at the table in discussion i=of immigration?
|
Forum
Pages: 
