Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15
Send Topic Print
Another Islamophobe attacks... (Read 14978 times)
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #150 - May 12th, 2019 at 8:08am
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 11:16pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 5:37pm:
Frank wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:27pm:
Karnal wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:21pm:
moses wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
gaandalf wrote: Reply #134 - May 7th, 2019 at 7:23pm
Quote:
you don't say.

How about Tarrant and Brievik and other Islamophobic attackers (sticking to the thread topic)? Can you offer an opinion on what "causes and motivates" them? Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example? I know you are determined to deflect to Islamic terrorism, but you know, just give it a try...


gandi sorry for the late response.

I have no idea what these idiots are motivated by to go out and murder people.

I don't think the police have arrested any accomplices for either of them, so they don't belong to a group of killers obviously, (unlike muslims where terrorist organizations abound).

With regards to your quote *Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example?*

How do you see this as a definitive call to people to slaughter muslims because they are inbred and low I.Q.?

If you do actually believe that criticizm is a unequivocal call to kill, do you then believe that the many verses in the qur'an which  criticize the non believer are an explicit call to muslims to slaughter the non believer?


Not when the Quran says to leave unbelievers alone, Moses. Not when it specifies that every human life is precious. Not when it instructs Muslims living in non-Muslim countries to follow the laws of the land. Not when it justifies war in self-defence only.

So I'm curious. When have the Musel "critics" ever stopped short of banning, killing and cestereting them?

When have you called out the old boy, Yadda or FD for using hate speech and inciting violence?

The peaceful verses have been abrogated by the jihadi verse. That's why  Islam had 1400 years of jihad and not 1400 years of leaving others well alone.


Christianity beats that by over 600 years, Soren.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Once more the apologists mindless evangelise their ignorance.

Slavery came to an end in Europe soon after the arrival of Christianity. Though the Muslims made a sincere effort at reintroducing it.


Actually, Slavery wasn't abolished in most of Europe until the 19th century, FD.   Appears your ignorance is showing once again.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Are you disagreeing with me, or being a useless pedant?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_medieval_Europe

Slavery had mostly died out in western Europe about the year 1000, replaced by serfdom.[dubious – discuss] It lingered longer in England and in peripheral areas linked to the Muslim world, where slavery continued to flourish. Slavery became more widespread in Ireland throughout the 11th century, as Dublin became the biggest slave market in Western Europe.[1] Church rules suppressed slavery of Christians. Most historians argue the transition was quite abrupt around 1000, but some see a gradual transition from about 300 to 1000.[2]

In the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, slaves became quite rare by the first half of the 7th century[3] A shift in the view of slavery is noticed, which by the 10th century transformed gradually a slave-object into a slave-subject.[4] From 11th century, semi-feudal relations largely replaced slavery, seen as "an evil contrary to natury, created by man's selfishness", although slavery was permitted by the law.[5]
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52839
Gender: male
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #151 - May 12th, 2019 at 11:57am
 
...
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44684
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #152 - May 12th, 2019 at 2:04pm
 
freediver wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 8:08am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 11:16pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 5:37pm:
Frank wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:27pm:
Karnal wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:21pm:
moses wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
gaandalf wrote: Reply #134 - May 7th, 2019 at 7:23pm
Quote:
you don't say.

How about Tarrant and Brievik and other Islamophobic attackers (sticking to the thread topic)? Can you offer an opinion on what "causes and motivates" them? Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example? I know you are determined to deflect to Islamic terrorism, but you know, just give it a try...


gandi sorry for the late response.

I have no idea what these idiots are motivated by to go out and murder people.

I don't think the police have arrested any accomplices for either of them, so they don't belong to a group of killers obviously, (unlike muslims where terrorist organizations abound).

With regards to your quote *Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example?*

How do you see this as a definitive call to people to slaughter muslims because they are inbred and low I.Q.?

If you do actually believe that criticizm is a unequivocal call to kill, do you then believe that the many verses in the qur'an which  criticize the non believer are an explicit call to muslims to slaughter the non believer?


Not when the Quran says to leave unbelievers alone, Moses. Not when it specifies that every human life is precious. Not when it instructs Muslims living in non-Muslim countries to follow the laws of the land. Not when it justifies war in self-defence only.

So I'm curious. When have the Musel "critics" ever stopped short of banning, killing and cestereting them?

When have you called out the old boy, Yadda or FD for using hate speech and inciting violence?

The peaceful verses have been abrogated by the jihadi verse. That's why  Islam had 1400 years of jihad and not 1400 years of leaving others well alone.


Christianity beats that by over 600 years, Soren.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Once more the apologists mindless evangelise their ignorance.

Slavery came to an end in Europe soon after the arrival of Christianity. Though the Muslims made a sincere effort at reintroducing it.


Actually, Slavery wasn't abolished in most of Europe until the 19th century, FD.   Appears your ignorance is showing once again.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Are you disagreeing with me, or being a useless pedant?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_medieval_Europe


I suggest you check out, instead - Timeline of abolition of slavery and serfdom.  Fascinating reading, FD. It will educate you a great deal.   Slavery was not outlawed in most of Europe until the 19th century.   Roll Eyes


Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #153 - May 12th, 2019 at 2:15pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 2:04pm:
freediver wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 8:08am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 11:16pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 5:37pm:
Frank wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:27pm:
Karnal wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:21pm:
moses wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
gaandalf wrote: Reply #134 - May 7th, 2019 at 7:23pm
Quote:
you don't say.

How about Tarrant and Brievik and other Islamophobic attackers (sticking to the thread topic)? Can you offer an opinion on what "causes and motivates" them? Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example? I know you are determined to deflect to Islamic terrorism, but you know, just give it a try...


gandi sorry for the late response.

I have no idea what these idiots are motivated by to go out and murder people.

I don't think the police have arrested any accomplices for either of them, so they don't belong to a group of killers obviously, (unlike muslims where terrorist organizations abound).

With regards to your quote *Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example?*

How do you see this as a definitive call to people to slaughter muslims because they are inbred and low I.Q.?

If you do actually believe that criticizm is a unequivocal call to kill, do you then believe that the many verses in the qur'an which  criticize the non believer are an explicit call to muslims to slaughter the non believer?


Not when the Quran says to leave unbelievers alone, Moses. Not when it specifies that every human life is precious. Not when it instructs Muslims living in non-Muslim countries to follow the laws of the land. Not when it justifies war in self-defence only.

So I'm curious. When have the Musel "critics" ever stopped short of banning, killing and cestereting them?

When have you called out the old boy, Yadda or FD for using hate speech and inciting violence?

The peaceful verses have been abrogated by the jihadi verse. That's why  Islam had 1400 years of jihad and not 1400 years of leaving others well alone.


Christianity beats that by over 600 years, Soren.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Once more the apologists mindless evangelise their ignorance.

Slavery came to an end in Europe soon after the arrival of Christianity. Though the Muslims made a sincere effort at reintroducing it.


Actually, Slavery wasn't abolished in most of Europe until the 19th century, FD.   Appears your ignorance is showing once again.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Are you disagreeing with me, or being a useless pedant?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_medieval_Europe

Slavery had mostly died out in western Europe about the year 1000, replaced by serfdom.[dubious – discuss] It lingered longer in England and in peripheral areas linked to the Muslim world, where slavery continued to flourish. Slavery became more widespread in Ireland throughout the 11th century, as Dublin became the biggest slave market in Western Europe.[1] Church rules suppressed slavery of Christians. Most historians argue the transition was quite abrupt around 1000, but some see a gradual transition from about 300 to 1000.[2]

In the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, slaves became quite rare by the first half of the 7th century[3] A shift in the view of slavery is noticed, which by the 10th century transformed gradually a slave-object into a slave-subject.[4] From 11th century, semi-feudal relations largely replaced slavery, seen as "an evil contrary to natury, created by man's selfishness", although slavery was permitted by the law.[5]



I suggest you check out, instead - Timeline of abolition of slavery and serfdom.  Fascinating reading, FD. It will educate you a great deal.   Slavery was not outlawed in most of Europe until the 19th century.   Roll Eyes




Are you disagreeing with me, or being a useless pedant?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44684
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #154 - May 12th, 2019 at 3:24pm
 
freediver wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 2:15pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 2:04pm:
freediver wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 8:08am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 11:16pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 5:37pm:
Frank wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:27pm:
Karnal wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:21pm:
moses wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
gaandalf wrote: Reply #134 - May 7th, 2019 at 7:23pm
Quote:
you don't say.

How about Tarrant and Brievik and other Islamophobic attackers (sticking to the thread topic)? Can you offer an opinion on what "causes and motivates" them? Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example? I know you are determined to deflect to Islamic terrorism, but you know, just give it a try...


gandi sorry for the late response.

I have no idea what these idiots are motivated by to go out and murder people.

I don't think the police have arrested any accomplices for either of them, so they don't belong to a group of killers obviously, (unlike muslims where terrorist organizations abound).

With regards to your quote *Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example?*

How do you see this as a definitive call to people to slaughter muslims because they are inbred and low I.Q.?

If you do actually believe that criticizm is a unequivocal call to kill, do you then believe that the many verses in the qur'an which  criticize the non believer are an explicit call to muslims to slaughter the non believer?


Not when the Quran says to leave unbelievers alone, Moses. Not when it specifies that every human life is precious. Not when it instructs Muslims living in non-Muslim countries to follow the laws of the land. Not when it justifies war in self-defence only.

So I'm curious. When have the Musel "critics" ever stopped short of banning, killing and cestereting them?

When have you called out the old boy, Yadda or FD for using hate speech and inciting violence?

The peaceful verses have been abrogated by the jihadi verse. That's why  Islam had 1400 years of jihad and not 1400 years of leaving others well alone.


Christianity beats that by over 600 years, Soren.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Once more the apologists mindless evangelise their ignorance.

Slavery came to an end in Europe soon after the arrival of Christianity. Though the Muslims made a sincere effort at reintroducing it.


Actually, Slavery wasn't abolished in most of Europe until the 19th century, FD.   Appears your ignorance is showing once again.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Are you disagreeing with me, or being a useless pedant?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_medieval_Europe

Slavery had mostly died out in western Europe about the year 1000, replaced by serfdom.[dubious – discuss] It lingered longer in England and in peripheral areas linked to the Muslim world, where slavery continued to flourish. Slavery became more widespread in Ireland throughout the 11th century, as Dublin became the biggest slave market in Western Europe.[1] Church rules suppressed slavery of Christians. Most historians argue the transition was quite abrupt around 1000, but some see a gradual transition from about 300 to 1000.[2]

In the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, slaves became quite rare by the first half of the 7th century[3] A shift in the view of slavery is noticed, which by the 10th century transformed gradually a slave-object into a slave-subject.[4] From 11th century, semi-feudal relations largely replaced slavery, seen as "an evil contrary to natury, created by man's selfishness", although slavery was permitted by the law.[5]



I suggest you check out, instead - Timeline of abolition of slavery and serfdom.  Fascinating reading, FD. It will educate you a great deal.   Slavery was not outlawed in most of Europe until the 19th century.   Roll Eyes


Are you disagreeing with me, or being a useless pedant?


I am citing a better source than your source, FD.  It is a great deal more detail and if you read it, which I doubt you have, you will discover that I am correct.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52839
Gender: male
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #155 - May 12th, 2019 at 4:55pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 11:16pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 5:37pm:
Frank wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:27pm:
Karnal wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:21pm:
moses wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
gaandalf wrote: Reply #134 - May 7th, 2019 at 7:23pm
Quote:
you don't say.

How about Tarrant and Brievik and other Islamophobic attackers (sticking to the thread topic)? Can you offer an opinion on what "causes and motivates" them? Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example? I know you are determined to deflect to Islamic terrorism, but you know, just give it a try...


gandi sorry for the late response.

I have no idea what these idiots are motivated by to go out and murder people.

I don't think the police have arrested any accomplices for either of them, so they don't belong to a group of killers obviously, (unlike muslims where terrorist organizations abound).

With regards to your quote *Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example?*

How do you see this as a definitive call to people to slaughter muslims because they are inbred and low I.Q.?

If you do actually believe that criticizm is a unequivocal call to kill, do you then believe that the many verses in the qur'an which  criticize the non believer are an explicit call to muslims to slaughter the non believer?


Not when the Quran says to leave unbelievers alone, Moses. Not when it specifies that every human life is precious. Not when it instructs Muslims living in non-Muslim countries to follow the laws of the land. Not when it justifies war in self-defence only.

So I'm curious. When have the Musel "critics" ever stopped short of banning, killing and cestereting them?

When have you called out the old boy, Yadda or FD for using hate speech and inciting violence?

The peaceful verses have been abrogated by the jihadi verse. That's why  Islam had 1400 years of jihad and not 1400 years of leaving others well alone.


Christianity beats that by over 600 years, Soren.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Once more the apologists mindless evangelise their ignorance.

Slavery came to an end in Europe soon after the arrival of Christianity. Though the Muslims made a sincere effort at reintroducing it.


Actually, Slavery wasn't abolished in most of Europe until the 19th century, FD.   Appears your ignorance is showing once again.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes




Slavery is STILL NOT abolished in Islam.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44684
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #156 - May 12th, 2019 at 6:06pm
 
Frank wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 4:55pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 11:16pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 5:37pm:
Frank wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:27pm:
Karnal wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:21pm:
moses wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
gaandalf wrote: Reply #134 - May 7th, 2019 at 7:23pm
Quote:
you don't say.

How about Tarrant and Brievik and other Islamophobic attackers (sticking to the thread topic)? Can you offer an opinion on what "causes and motivates" them? Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example? I know you are determined to deflect to Islamic terrorism, but you know, just give it a try...


gandi sorry for the late response.

I have no idea what these idiots are motivated by to go out and murder people.

I don't think the police have arrested any accomplices for either of them, so they don't belong to a group of killers obviously, (unlike muslims where terrorist organizations abound).

With regards to your quote *Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example?*

How do you see this as a definitive call to people to slaughter muslims because they are inbred and low I.Q.?

If you do actually believe that criticizm is a unequivocal call to kill, do you then believe that the many verses in the qur'an which  criticize the non believer are an explicit call to muslims to slaughter the non believer?


Not when the Quran says to leave unbelievers alone, Moses. Not when it specifies that every human life is precious. Not when it instructs Muslims living in non-Muslim countries to follow the laws of the land. Not when it justifies war in self-defence only.

So I'm curious. When have the Musel "critics" ever stopped short of banning, killing and cestereting them?

When have you called out the old boy, Yadda or FD for using hate speech and inciting violence?

The peaceful verses have been abrogated by the jihadi verse. That's why  Islam had 1400 years of jihad and not 1400 years of leaving others well alone.


Christianity beats that by over 600 years, Soren.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Once more the apologists mindless evangelise their ignorance.

Slavery came to an end in Europe soon after the arrival of Christianity. Though the Muslims made a sincere effort at reintroducing it.


Actually, Slavery wasn't abolished in most of Europe until the 19th century, FD.   Appears your ignorance is showing once again.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Slavery is STILL NOT abolished in Islam.


Actually, it isn't in Christianity, either, Soren.  Both Christianity and Islam are religions, not nations, in case it's escaped your notice, young fellow me lad.   Roll Eyes

Most Muslim countries have outlawed Slavery.  Check out the source I linked to.  It has a case by case list of when each country outlawed slavery - including the Muslim ones, Soren.

That is if you're willing to take off the blinkers that your Islamophobia has put before your eyes.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52839
Gender: male
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #157 - May 12th, 2019 at 7:16pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 6:06pm:
Frank wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 4:55pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 11:16pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 5:37pm:
Frank wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:27pm:
Karnal wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:21pm:
moses wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
gaandalf wrote: Reply #134 - May 7th, 2019 at 7:23pm
Quote:
you don't say.

How about Tarrant and Brievik and other Islamophobic attackers (sticking to the thread topic)? Can you offer an opinion on what "causes and motivates" them? Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example? I know you are determined to deflect to Islamic terrorism, but you know, just give it a try...


gandi sorry for the late response.

I have no idea what these idiots are motivated by to go out and murder people.

I don't think the police have arrested any accomplices for either of them, so they don't belong to a group of killers obviously, (unlike muslims where terrorist organizations abound).

With regards to your quote *Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example?*

How do you see this as a definitive call to people to slaughter muslims because they are inbred and low I.Q.?

If you do actually believe that criticizm is a unequivocal call to kill, do you then believe that the many verses in the qur'an which  criticize the non believer are an explicit call to muslims to slaughter the non believer?


Not when the Quran says to leave unbelievers alone, Moses. Not when it specifies that every human life is precious. Not when it instructs Muslims living in non-Muslim countries to follow the laws of the land. Not when it justifies war in self-defence only.

So I'm curious. When have the Musel "critics" ever stopped short of banning, killing and cestereting them?

When have you called out the old boy, Yadda or FD for using hate speech and inciting violence?

The peaceful verses have been abrogated by the jihadi verse. That's why  Islam had 1400 years of jihad and not 1400 years of leaving others well alone.


Christianity beats that by over 600 years, Soren.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Once more the apologists mindless evangelise their ignorance.

Slavery came to an end in Europe soon after the arrival of Christianity. Though the Muslims made a sincere effort at reintroducing it.


Actually, Slavery wasn't abolished in most of Europe until the 19th century, FD.   Appears your ignorance is showing once again.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Slavery is STILL NOT abolished in Islam.


Actually, it isn't in Christianity, either, Soren.  Both Christianity and Islam are religions, not nations, in case it's escaped your notice, young fellow me lad.   Roll Eyes

Most Muslim countries have outlawed Slavery.  Check out the source I linked to.  It has a case by case list of when each country outlawed slavery - including the Muslim ones, Soren.

That is if you're willing to take off the blinkers that your Islamophobia has put before your eyes.    Roll Eyes



Bollocks, Bwian, as usual.

Christian countries have outlawed slavery a long time ago. Muslims still have sex slaves to this day in their 'caliphate' because it's Islamically permitted.  Middle Eastern Arabs have subcontinental and Philippino slaves. Because it's not un-Islamic to have slaves - so they have them.  And of course you are now eagerly siding with not only Islamic murderers, Bwian, but Islamic slavers.  How about marriage at 9? You defend that islamic idea as well? Go on, you have sided with every other kind of barbarity, why not this one? 

Is there any Islamic barbarity that you will not side with?
Name one, Bwian?   Name one.  Just one Islamic barbarity you openly reject.



You will simply refuse to name one because you know that from there on you will have to reject others if you wanted to be consistent. But consistency would ruin all your idiotic blabberings and so you will not find fault with any Islamic doctrine.

You are a confirmed spineless, squishy, lying cowardly bed-wetter - have I left out anything?





.




Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Johnnie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 12485
Gender: male
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #158 - May 12th, 2019 at 8:17pm
 
The Muslims by their very actions have worn out the welcome mat in the West. Millions of them walk around and around in circles throwing stones at the devil in some death cult ritual and then cut peoples heads off, I don't trust those type.



Back to top
 

crazies.jpg (145 KB | 16 )
crazies.jpg
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 77796
Gender: male
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #159 - May 12th, 2019 at 8:35pm
 
Frank wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 7:16pm:
Muslims still have sex slaves to this day in their 'caliphate' because it's Islamically permitted


Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

The practices of slavery and human trafficking are still prevalent in modern America with estimated 17,500 foreign nationals and 400,000 Americans being trafficked into and within the United States [2] every year with 80% of those being women and children


...............

In terms of prevalence of modern slavery, North Korea tops the list at 104.6 per 1,000 people. The Philippines, meanwhile, ranked 30th overall (out of 167 countries) with 7.70 per 1,000 people. The Philippines is also considered to be highly vulnerable to modern slavery with an average score of 60.24, above the global and Asia Pacific averages of 45.6 and 46.1, respectively.

https://www.bworldonline.com/how-prevalent-is-modern-slavery-in-the-philippines/
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #160 - May 12th, 2019 at 9:27pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 3:24pm:
freediver wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 2:15pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 2:04pm:
freediver wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 8:08am:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 11:16pm:
freediver wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
Brian Ross wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 5:37pm:
Frank wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:27pm:
Karnal wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 2:21pm:
moses wrote on May 11th, 2019 at 1:54pm:
gaandalf wrote: Reply #134 - May 7th, 2019 at 7:23pm
Quote:
you don't say.

How about Tarrant and Brievik and other Islamophobic attackers (sticking to the thread topic)? Can you offer an opinion on what "causes and motivates" them? Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example? I know you are determined to deflect to Islamic terrorism, but you know, just give it a try...


gandi sorry for the late response.

I have no idea what these idiots are motivated by to go out and murder people.

I don't think the police have arrested any accomplices for either of them, so they don't belong to a group of killers obviously, (unlike muslims where terrorist organizations abound).

With regards to your quote *Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example?*

How do you see this as a definitive call to people to slaughter muslims because they are inbred and low I.Q.?

If you do actually believe that criticizm is a unequivocal call to kill, do you then believe that the many verses in the qur'an which  criticize the non believer are an explicit call to muslims to slaughter the non believer?


Not when the Quran says to leave unbelievers alone, Moses. Not when it specifies that every human life is precious. Not when it instructs Muslims living in non-Muslim countries to follow the laws of the land. Not when it justifies war in self-defence only.

So I'm curious. When have the Musel "critics" ever stopped short of banning, killing and cestereting them?

When have you called out the old boy, Yadda or FD for using hate speech and inciting violence?

The peaceful verses have been abrogated by the jihadi verse. That's why  Islam had 1400 years of jihad and not 1400 years of leaving others well alone.


Christianity beats that by over 600 years, Soren.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


Once more the apologists mindless evangelise their ignorance.

Slavery came to an end in Europe soon after the arrival of Christianity. Though the Muslims made a sincere effort at reintroducing it.


Actually, Slavery wasn't abolished in most of Europe until the 19th century, FD.   Appears your ignorance is showing once again.  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Are you disagreeing with me, or being a useless pedant?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_medieval_Europe

Slavery had mostly died out in western Europe about the year 1000, replaced by serfdom.[dubious – discuss] It lingered longer in England and in peripheral areas linked to the Muslim world, where slavery continued to flourish. Slavery became more widespread in Ireland throughout the 11th century, as Dublin became the biggest slave market in Western Europe.[1] Church rules suppressed slavery of Christians. Most historians argue the transition was quite abrupt around 1000, but some see a gradual transition from about 300 to 1000.[2]

In the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, slaves became quite rare by the first half of the 7th century[3] A shift in the view of slavery is noticed, which by the 10th century transformed gradually a slave-object into a slave-subject.[4] From 11th century, semi-feudal relations largely replaced slavery, seen as "an evil contrary to natury, created by man's selfishness", although slavery was permitted by the law.[5]



I suggest you check out, instead - Timeline of abolition of slavery and serfdom.  Fascinating reading, FD. It will educate you a great deal.   Slavery was not outlawed in most of Europe until the 19th century.   Roll Eyes


Are you disagreeing with me, or being a useless pedant?


I am citing a better source than your source, FD.  It is a great deal more detail and if you read it, which I doubt you have, you will discover that I am correct.    Roll Eyes


Are you correct because you disagree with me, or because you are a useless pedant?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #161 - May 12th, 2019 at 9:28pm
 
John Smith wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 8:35pm:
Frank wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 7:16pm:
Muslims still have sex slaves to this day in their 'caliphate' because it's Islamically permitted


Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

The practices of slavery and human trafficking are still prevalent in modern America with estimated 17,500 foreign nationals and 400,000 Americans being trafficked into and within the United States [2] every year with 80% of those being women and children


...............

In terms of prevalence of modern slavery, North Korea tops the list at 104.6 per 1,000 people. The Philippines, meanwhile, ranked 30th overall (out of 167 countries) with 7.70 per 1,000 people. The Philippines is also considered to be highly vulnerable to modern slavery with an average score of 60.24, above the global and Asia Pacific averages of 45.6 and 46.1, respectively.

https://www.bworldonline.com/how-prevalent-is-modern-slavery-in-the-philippines/


Have you ever seen a Muslim say that slavery is inherently wrong?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 98944
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #162 - May 12th, 2019 at 10:01pm
 
freediver wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 9:28pm:
John Smith wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 8:35pm:
Frank wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 7:16pm:
Muslims still have sex slaves to this day in their 'caliphate' because it's Islamically permitted


Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

The practices of slavery and human trafficking are still prevalent in modern America with estimated 17,500 foreign nationals and 400,000 Americans being trafficked into and within the United States [2] every year with 80% of those being women and children


...............

In terms of prevalence of modern slavery, North Korea tops the list at 104.6 per 1,000 people. The Philippines, meanwhile, ranked 30th overall (out of 167 countries) with 7.70 per 1,000 people. The Philippines is also considered to be highly vulnerable to modern slavery with an average score of 60.24, above the global and Asia Pacific averages of 45.6 and 46.1, respectively.

https://www.bworldonline.com/how-prevalent-is-modern-slavery-in-the-philippines/


Have you ever seen a Muslim say that slavery is inherently wrong?


Apart from G and, you know, Abu?

No, FD, I don't think I have. You?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #163 - May 12th, 2019 at 10:10pm
 
Karnal wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 10:01pm:
freediver wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 9:28pm:
John Smith wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 8:35pm:
Frank wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 7:16pm:
Muslims still have sex slaves to this day in their 'caliphate' because it's Islamically permitted


Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

The practices of slavery and human trafficking are still prevalent in modern America with estimated 17,500 foreign nationals and 400,000 Americans being trafficked into and within the United States [2] every year with 80% of those being women and children


...............

In terms of prevalence of modern slavery, North Korea tops the list at 104.6 per 1,000 people. The Philippines, meanwhile, ranked 30th overall (out of 167 countries) with 7.70 per 1,000 people. The Philippines is also considered to be highly vulnerable to modern slavery with an average score of 60.24, above the global and Asia Pacific averages of 45.6 and 46.1, respectively.

https://www.bworldonline.com/how-prevalent-is-modern-slavery-in-the-philippines/


Have you ever seen a Muslim say that slavery is inherently wrong?


Apart from G and, you know, Abu?

No, FD, I don't think I have. You?


Can you quote them?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 98944
Re: Another Islamophobe attacks...
Reply #164 - May 12th, 2019 at 10:28pm
 
freediver wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 10:10pm:
Karnal wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 10:01pm:
freediver wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 9:28pm:
John Smith wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 8:35pm:
Frank wrote on May 12th, 2019 at 7:16pm:
Muslims still have sex slaves to this day in their 'caliphate' because it's Islamically permitted


Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

The practices of slavery and human trafficking are still prevalent in modern America with estimated 17,500 foreign nationals and 400,000 Americans being trafficked into and within the United States [2] every year with 80% of those being women and children


...............

In terms of prevalence of modern slavery, North Korea tops the list at 104.6 per 1,000 people. The Philippines, meanwhile, ranked 30th overall (out of 167 countries) with 7.70 per 1,000 people. The Philippines is also considered to be highly vulnerable to modern slavery with an average score of 60.24, above the global and Asia Pacific averages of 45.6 and 46.1, respectively.

https://www.bworldonline.com/how-prevalent-is-modern-slavery-in-the-philippines/


Have you ever seen a Muslim say that slavery is inherently wrong?


Apart from G and, you know, Abu?

No, FD, I don't think I have. You?


Can you quote them?


Quote them saying something about slavery?

No, FD, I don't think I can.

You?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... 15
Send Topic Print