freediver
Gold Member
   
Offline

www.ozpolitic.com
Posts: 51285
At my desk.
|
Brian Ross wrote on May 12 th, 2019 at 3:24pm: freediver wrote on May 12 th, 2019 at 2:15pm: Brian Ross wrote on May 12 th, 2019 at 2:04pm: freediver wrote on May 12 th, 2019 at 8:08am: Brian Ross wrote on May 11 th, 2019 at 11:16pm: freediver wrote on May 11 th, 2019 at 6:47pm: Brian Ross wrote on May 11 th, 2019 at 5:37pm: Frank wrote on May 11 th, 2019 at 2:27pm: Karnal wrote on May 11 th, 2019 at 2:21pm: moses wrote on May 11 th, 2019 at 1:54pm: gaandalf wrote: Reply #134 - May 7th, 2019 at 7:23pm Quote:you don't say.
How about Tarrant and Brievik and other Islamophobic attackers (sticking to the thread topic)? Can you offer an opinion on what "causes and motivates" them? Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example? I know you are determined to deflect to Islamic terrorism, but you know, just give it a try... gandi sorry for the late response. I have no idea what these idiots are motivated by to go out and murder people. I don't think the police have arrested any accomplices for either of them, so they don't belong to a group of killers obviously, (unlike muslims where terrorist organizations abound). With regards to your quote *Preaching that 100% of muslims are psychopathic and mentally disabled due to inbreeding for example?* How do you see this as a definitive call to people to slaughter muslims because they are inbred and low I.Q.? If you do actually believe that criticizm is a unequivocal call to kill, do you then believe that the many verses in the qur'an which criticize the non believer are an explicit call to muslims to slaughter the non believer? Not when the Quran says to leave unbelievers alone, Moses. Not when it specifies that every human life is precious. Not when it instructs Muslims living in non-Muslim countries to follow the laws of the land. Not when it justifies war in self-defence only. So I'm curious. When have the Musel "critics" ever stopped short of banning, killing and cestereting them? When have you called out the old boy, Yadda or FD for using hate speech and inciting violence? The peaceful verses have been abrogated by the jihadi verse. That's why Islam had 1400 years of jihad and not 1400 years of leaving others well alone. Christianity beats that by over 600 years, Soren. Tsk, tsk. Once more the apologists mindless evangelise their ignorance. Slavery came to an end in Europe soon after the arrival of Christianity. Though the Muslims made a sincere effort at reintroducing it. Actually, Slavery wasn't abolished in most of Europe until the 19th century, FD. Appears your ignorance is showing once again. Tsk, tsk. Are you disagreeing with me, or being a useless pedant? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_medieval_Europe Slavery had mostly died out in western Europe about the year 1000, replaced by serfdom.[dubious – discuss] It lingered longer in England and in peripheral areas linked to the Muslim world, where slavery continued to flourish. Slavery became more widespread in Ireland throughout the 11th century, as Dublin became the biggest slave market in Western Europe.[1] Church rules suppressed slavery of Christians. Most historians argue the transition was quite abrupt around 1000, but some see a gradual transition from about 300 to 1000.[2]
In the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire, slaves became quite rare by the first half of the 7th century[3] A shift in the view of slavery is noticed, which by the 10th century transformed gradually a slave-object into a slave-subject.[4] From 11th century, semi-feudal relations largely replaced slavery, seen as "an evil contrary to natury, created by man's selfishness", although slavery was permitted by the law.[5] I suggest you check out, instead - Timeline of abolition of slavery and serfdom. Fascinating reading, FD. It will educate you a great deal. Slavery was not outlawed in most of Europe until the 19th century. Are you disagreeing with me, or being a useless pedant? I am citing a better source than your source, FD. It is a great deal more detail and if you read it, which I doubt you have, you will discover that I am correct. Are you correct because you disagree with me, or because you are a useless pedant?
|