Quote:


The fact that Muslims try to polish this turd does not change the fact that they support genocide, any more than a Nazi offering excuses or denial regarding the holocaust changes the fact that they also support genocide.

Quote:


The highest result I saw on google was from ex-Muslims.

polite_gandalf wrote on May 2^nd, 2019 at 2:45pm:


I did not say they were equal Gandalf. The Nazis were far more efficient.

Quote:


No Gandalf. They were two completely different genocides. Don't get hysterical now.

Quote:


What "muslim mind-borg rhetoric"?

freediver wrote on May 2^nd, 2019 at 8:36pm:


Have you ever met a muslim who isn't a reflexive supporter of genocide?

Apparently you haven't - not even your lovely workmates with whom you expressly
avoid the topic with.

In your terminology, thats called reducing the entire muslim population to a 'mindless collective', which of course is dehumanizing, and the classic characteristic of prejudice. Personally I believe it gives you a guilty conscience and is the reason why you continually need to compensate by performing the most absurd mental gymnastics and even having to literally make up what I said to pretend that its actually me who engages in such prejudice.

But thats just me 

It seems impossible to understand the real FD.

One minute he shares his experience with real muslims - drinking a beer with his muslim workmates that he clearly respects, or going to the trouble to sit down with a muslim woman at his tennis club to try and understand how they feel... the next minute literally smearing the entire muslim population, to a man woman and child, as reflexive genocide supporters without batting an eyelid.

He'll write passionately about how important it is to make a stand against attacks on free speech - all the while he is in permanent witness protection in the face of the constant barrage of attacks against the freedom of muslims.

He'll start a sensible and worthy topic, and he'll set out his position in a reasonable, well thought out way - only to reduce himself to a petty and vindictive "reply by zinger" debating style if anyone dares engage him. Sometimes I sit there in awe seeing the way he so ruthlessly and methodically trashes his own worthy topics into the most crass mudslinging contests.

I really can't work him out. He goes to the trouble of starting a forum with the most noble of intentions - to facilitate free speech, But rather than fostering sensible and constructive debate, he actually seems to revel in dragging it into the gutter. Bigotry and petty squabbling reign, and proper, constructive debate is actively disincentivised. And now actually its no longer a joke in the wake of Christchurch. When we as a society start to understand the role played by online discussion forums in creating and nurturing the Tarrant's of this world and their ideology of hate, its very apparent that this very forum fits the bill so terrifyingly closely.

Quote:


So now the problem is that muzzies spend too much time on debate sites.

I mean they are the worlds terrorists, they are the major terror threat globally, their heartlands are nothing but piles of rubble, they are the major refugee problem globally, they are slaughtering their own children in the tens of thousands from hunger and refugee trauma because they insist in killing each other and the *moderates* are trying to tell us internet debate sites are the cause?

Well spit three times and call me allah, the crap just keeps piling up.

How do I equate the two brands of terrorism?

Easy gandi they are both acts of terrorism.

Now what I pointed out to you is that muslims are top of the tree when it comes to terrorism.

I know for certain that debate sites are not the cause and motivation for islamic terrorism, your holy book is.