Australian Politics Forum - Evidence for global warming.

random

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2637
Gender: male

Re: Evidence for global warming.
Reply #435 - Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:06pm

lee wrote on Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:03pm:

random wrote on Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:01pm:

PM me mate, I need some pocket money and I could do it in my PJs, would be awesome.

That's what happens when you live in your mother's basement. Grin

I've been studying your style, tell your boss I get it, never deny, just sow fear and doubt, that's what its about.

You could mentor me for the first few days. PM me mate.

Back to top

So many farkwits, so little time.

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 18870 Gender:	Re: Evidence for global warming. Reply #436 - Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:11pm random wrote on Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:06pm: I've been studying your style, tell your boss I get it, never deny, just sow fear and doubt, that's what its about. At least I have style petal. You? Nada. And you still won't debate science.
Back to top	IP Logged

random

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2637
Gender: male

Re: Evidence for global warming.
Reply #437 - Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:24pm

lee wrote on Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:11pm:

random wrote on Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:06pm:

I've been studying your style, tell your boss I get it, never deny, just sow fear and doubt, that's what its about.

At least I have style petal. Grin

You? Nada.

And you still won't debate science. Wink

I get it right. I'm good with it. I can be anti-science easy as.

Doesn't matter what they post, just say stuff that questions what they post. Even if they post stuff from the BOM or CSIRO, just say that they fudge the figures! It's easy as bro.

PM me, I want in.

Back to top

So many farkwits, so little time.

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 18870 Gender:	Re: Evidence for global warming. Reply #438 - Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:34pm random wrote on Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:24pm: I can be anti-science easy as. You show that with every attempt. But back to your graph of more Hot days. Did you realise that more more people died from cold 2000-2009 which is in the middle of those increasing hot days? Bizarre eh?
Back to top	IP Logged

random

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2637
Gender: male

Re: Evidence for global warming.
Reply #439 - Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:38pm

lee wrote on Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:34pm:

random wrote on Dec 19^th, 2019 at 6:24pm:

I can be anti-science easy as.

You show that with every attempt.

But back to your graph of more Hot days. Did you realise that more more people died from cold 2000-2009 which is in the middle of those increasing hot days?

Bizarre eh?

straw man

"noun: strawman

1. an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument. "

See I've been studying up on this shill thing. I need the cash mate, help me out.

Back to top

So many farkwits, so little time.

IP Logged

Johnnie Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 12485 Gender:	Re: Evidence for global warming. Reply #440 - Dec 21^st, 2019 at 1:51pm Multiple high temperature records smashed across SA yesterday, could Greta be right!
Back to top	Angry_Greta__001.jpg (77 KB \| 22 ) IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 18870 Gender:	Re: Evidence for global warming. Reply #441 - Dec 21^st, 2019 at 1:59pm Johnnie wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 1:51pm: Multiple high temperature records smashed across SA yesterday, could Greta be right! Probably not. She certainly isn't right about 200 animal extinctions a day. Only 400 in the last 200 years.
Back to top	IP Logged

random

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2637
Gender: male

Re: Evidence for global warming.
Reply #442 - Dec 21^st, 2019 at 3:19pm

lee wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 1:59pm:

Johnnie wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 1:51pm:

Multiple high temperature records smashed across SA yesterday, could Greta be right!

Probably not. She certainly isn't right about 200 animal extinctions a day.

Only 400 in the last 200 years. Wink

WOw Lee, and to think you were my hero shill!!!!!! Even I could do better than that.

I should have your job. Up your act mate.

" If the low estimate of the number of species out there is true - i.e. that there are around 2 million different species on our planet** - then that means between 200 and 2,000 extinctions occur every year.
But if the upper estimate of species numbers is true - that there are 100 million different species co-existing with us on our planet - then between 10,000 and 100,000 species are becoming extinct each year.

*Experts actually call this natural extinction rate the background extinction rate. This simply means the rate of species extinctions that would occur if we humans were not around."

Back to top

So many farkwits, so little time.

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 18870
Gender: male

Re: Evidence for global warming.
Reply #443 - Dec 21^st, 2019 at 3:56pm

random wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 3:19pm:

" If the low estimate of the number of species out there is true - i.e. that there are around 2 million different species on our planet** - then that means between 200 and 2,000 extinctions occur every year.
But if the upper estimate of species numbers is true - that there are 100 million different species co-existing with us on our planet - then between 10,000 and 100,000 species are becoming extinct each year.

*Experts actually call this natural extinction rate the background extinction rate. This simply means the rate of species extinctions that would occur if we humans were not around."

Oh you mean the modeled study? Not base in reality Just "we don't know all the species but if we assume we only know X times" type of garbage.

Those "ifs" Grin

"But nobody knows whether such estimates are anywhere close to reality. They are based on computer modeling, and documented losses are tiny by comparison. Only about 800 extinctions have been documented in the past 400 years, according to data held by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). "

https://e360.yale.edu/features/global_extinction_rates_why_do_estimates_vary_so_...

Too bloody funny. Grin

But you show you don't do science.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 21^st, 2019 at 4:10pm by lee »

IP Logged

random

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2637
Gender: male

Re: Evidence for global warming.
Reply #444 - Dec 21^st, 2019 at 5:44pm

lee wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 3:56pm:

random wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 3:19pm:

" If the low estimate of the number of species out there is true - i.e. that there are around 2 million different species on our planet** - then that means between 200 and 2,000 extinctions occur every year.
But if the upper estimate of species numbers is true - that there are 100 million different species co-existing with us on our planet - then between 10,000 and 100,000 species are becoming extinct each year.

*Experts actually call this natural extinction rate the background extinction rate. This simply means the rate of species extinctions that would occur if we humans were not around."

Oh you mean the modeled study? Not base in reality Just "we don't know all the species but if we assume we only know X times" type of garbage.

Those "ifs" Grin

"But nobody knows whether such estimates are anywhere close to reality. They are based on computer modeling, and documented losses are tiny by comparison. Only about 800 extinctions have been documented in the past 400 years, according to data held by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). "

https://e360.yale.edu/features/global_extinction_rates_why_do_estimates_vary_so_...

Too bloody funny. Grin

But you show you don't do science.

And you have just demonstrated to all here how you don't "do science".

Back to top

So many farkwits, so little time.

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 18870 Gender:	Re: Evidence for global warming. Reply #445 - Dec 21^st, 2019 at 5:45pm random wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 5:44pm: And you have just demonstrated to all here how you don't "do science". Poor petal. Puts modeled "data" up against confirmed extinctions. Science is about observation of events petal. Not observation of models.
Back to top	IP Logged

random Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2637 Gender:	Re: Evidence for global warming. Reply #446 - Dec 21^st, 2019 at 5:55pm lee wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 5:45pm: random wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 5:44pm: And you have just demonstrated to all here how you don't "do science". Poor petal. Puts modeled "data" up against confirmed extinctions. Science is about observation of events petal. Not observation of models.
Back to top	So many farkwits, so little time. IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 51628
Gender: male

Re: Evidence for global warming.
Reply #447 - Dec 21^st, 2019 at 7:11pm

random wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 5:55pm:

lee wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 5:45pm:

random wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 5:44pm:

And you have just demonstrated to all here how you don't "do science".

Poor petal. Puts modeled "data" up against confirmed extinctions. Grin

Science is about observation of events petal. Not observation of models. Wink

https://media.giphy.com/media/13C9Ls0jJOKJLq/200.gif

You got him, lee.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

random Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2637 Gender:	Re: Evidence for global warming. Reply #448 - Dec 21^st, 2019 at 7:18pm Frank wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 7:11pm: random wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 5:55pm: lee wrote on Dec 21^st, 2019 at 5:45pm: [quote author=random link=1552800608/444#444 date=1576914258]And you have just demonstrated to all here how you don't "do science". You got him, lee.
Back to top	So many farkwits, so little time. IP Logged