Quote:Humans are not hair dryers or refrigerators. Hence human breeding is not the equivalent of “mass production”. And what makes you think the “faulty human” has a next life? And where do you draw the line, again. You’ve already eliminated Down’s Syndrome. Hair lips? Schizophrenia? You are on a very slippery slope here PZ
I'm a supporter of eugenics and have said so many times. A farmer does not breed from the halt and lame. A farmer does not save seed from bad crops and plant them. What's the definition of stupidity? It is, boiled down, someone who does the same thing repeatedly, expecting a different result. I'm not editing or proof reading any of this, so don't get to involved in analysing it in depth, ok
In the natural world, let's say a herd of zebra, they don't carry their lame and diseased members around. Those that can't keep up are left behind for predators. The natural world employs eugenics. Only emotion-ridden, guilt-ridden, religiously bullied into believing all life is sacred humans, breed from the unfit
God helps he who helps himself. The Pope ignores a lot but redeems himself in the eyes of the simple minded by exhorting people to 'give to the poor'. 90% of what they give ends up in the wrong pockets, but that's incidental. The Pope will not sanction birth control, so kids of five years of age, nine years of age, are made pregnant and abortion is refused them. God expects us to help ourselves climb out of an overpopulated world by thinking smart, not emotionally. If we don't start thinking smart, we're going down. If you have objection to my quoting God, attribute it to Mickey Mouse, makes no difference. All the blue eyed people in teh world are said to descend from four women, from what I remember. See what prolific breeders humans are.
Doesn't matter if I'm on a slippery slope. Humanity is close to perching on the edge of a cliff. You have access to water, to food, to internet. Can you adapt to a life of fighting for scraps of food and half a cup of slime? But you figure, no doubt, that it won't reach tipping point in your lifetime, so you'll be fine. Do you have kids, grandkids, great grandkids? Will they be fine living like rats? How much longer before we start thinking smart -- do we wait until it's too late?
and when a ship is sinking or a plane losing height, what do they do? They jettison
everything to save their skins. When the chips are down, humans suddenly gain perspective about who and what is important. Why wait until the last minute?
Human breeding is very much a case of mass production. Go up six miles and look down. What do you see? You'll see babies popping out like hot cross buns coming out of the bakery oven.
I mentioned the biological imperative, which for those who don't know, is Nature's edict that we replace ourselves before we depart life. We don't even know why it's such a big deal. Dandelions and cockroaches do the same. Humans are far from unique in that. Everything replacing itself mindlessly -- billions of humans, trillions of cockroaches all mass producing. Then struggling to raise the offspring to a point of independent life. And making a virtue of it ! All that human potential unrealised because Time, Energy and Resources are devoted to the young. After that, Life/Nature has no need for the parent. And we hide from that reality. We lie about it. We say it was worth it. When in many cases it was not. But we build our reason for living on the belief that we've done something noble by perpetuating the species
Brumbies are beautiful animals, as are kangaroos, dingos, etc. We cull them. We cull healthy camels and donkeys and turn them into pet food. Humans are practical and rutheless about all apart from themselves. Nature programmed us to become infatuated with our own young, no matter how faulty, yes faulty, they might be. Zebras don't make that mistake and therefore maintain the health and welfare of the herd
You're being facetious when you list hair-lips, obviously. As to schizophrenia ... it's a problem. Ten and more years ago in the UK, it was conceded by the authorities that at least one person a week was murdered by a schizophrenic. I don't believe that's a fair trade -- a schizophrenic is released from an institution, trusted with taking their medication, thus freedom for them and death (often brutal) for a random, functioning victim. If a person suffering a mental or other disability cannot function and is a danger to society, then yes, they have to go
Twice today, in the news, I read of someone citing mental illness (and drugs, drink) as their defence after they'd killed one or more others. I'm with Duterte -- despatch them to their maker. We dispose of household garbage. Idiots hoard their garbage. We're trying to keep a ship afloat. We're trying to maintain civilized societies. Cuts have to be made. Mental asylums and homes for the infirm used to keep societies' streets relatively clean. But they were inhumane. The inmates are on the streets now. And now, society is like an insane asylum. Woman wandering around here is grotesque. She walks into businesses and defecates on their floors. The police take her away. Her family, keen for carer's allowance, get her out and the process is repeated endlessly. Men sleep with her and give her cigarettes. She's semi human. I believe she'd be better off out of this life. Zebras would agree