Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Agri-Forestry, better than Agri-culture? (Read 178 times)
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 58020
Gender: male
Agri-Forestry, better than Agri-culture?
Feb 13th, 2019 at 9:14pm
 
Being 'civilised' meant living in areas that had big buildings in it and Farming. The first 'Civilised' area was the Euphrates Rivers area - Sumeria, Babylonia, Persia, Levant, Iraq/Iran/etc.

But it seems that Agri-Forestry was the far superior of the two.
Only people in 'arid' lands of little food took up 'Farming' of crops. People who were able to attain their foods in plenty by their own 'environment' really did 'reap' the reward. Peoples would no more than 'replant' seeds of fruit or vegetables just 'wildly' around and know that where-ever they went, they were surrounded by 'Food'.

So when it comes to food - 'wild' is better than 'farmed' (especially with seafood).
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print