Australian Politics Forum - Not Small Hands

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Not Small Hands
Reply #60 - Dec 28^th, 2018 at 11:15am

Aussie wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 8:19am:

cods wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 8:14am:

rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 12:27am:

Aussie wrote on Dec 27^th, 2018 at 5:18pm:

If I had gone to the Cops, the schit head, not me, would have been in Court.

well thats not true now is it? You would have been charged with assault. The law allows you to use reasonable force to defend yourself, i am very familiar with use of force laws, I get retrained in this legislation every 6 months or so. While QLD laws may vary slightly they are much the same as where I live. You didnt defend yourself, you retaliated. You were in no physical danger, very easy to remove yourself from the situation. And you assaulted someone whom the law regards as a child. There is zero doubt that had a complaint been made you would have been facing a possible jail term. the law doesnt condone revenge attacks as you are trying to make out. And you know it, so cut the cr@p. Your narcissism allowed you to relate the story here on this forum, trying to make yourself the big man, back fired badly on you didnt it.

he conveniently claims this doesnt exist..

http://statements.qld.gov.au/Statement/2018/1/29/queensland-juvenile-justice-ref...

Monday, January 29, 2018
Queensland juvenile justice reforms announced last year will commence on February 12
Queensland will treat 17 year-olds under Youth Justice laws instead of as adults from February 12, delivering on a Palaszczuk Government promise and bringing the state into line with legislation in all other Australian jurisdictions.

The change follows the passing of the Youth Justice and Other Legislation (Inclusion of 17-year-old Persons) Amendment Act by the Queensland Parliament in 2016, to amend the age that a person can be charged as an adult from 17 to 18 years of age.

Minister for Child Safety, Youth and Women, Di Farmer, said implementation of the reforms fulfilled the government’s commitment to breaking the cycle of youth offending.

“The Palaszczuk Government will continue to drive reforms that tackle the causes and the consequences of offending by children and young people,” Ms Farmer said.

“We will do everything we can to turn them away from a life of crime and the harms and costs to the community that results.

“Instead we want these kids safe, educated, employed, playing sport and healthy, and not offending.

“We can’t give up on them having a brighter future.”

YOU LOSE AUSSIE..

Jayzuz you are a pair of complete fools. If he was under 17, that does not make him invulnerable to being appropriately resisted and taken very briefly into custody, as I did.

Further, the incident occurred many years ago...well before Palaszczuk.

Lol. You trying to spin your assault as a citizens arrest now? That wont save you either. But give it a go, Im enjoying this. On what grounds did you "arrest" this child and what specific legislation allowed you to do so.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39545
Gender: male

Re: Not Small Hands
Reply #61 - Dec 28^th, 2018 at 11:21am

Quote:

Lol. You trying to spin your assault as a citizens arrest now? That wont save you either. But give it a go, Im enjoying this. On what grounds did you "arrest" this child and what specific legislation allowed you to do so.

I am able to access whatever the Law allows me to access. I acted immediately to neutralise a threat, held him briefly to get his details, and released him.

Have a look at S. 546 of the Qld Criminal Code.

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17179 Gender:	Re: Not Small Hands Reply #62 - Dec 28^th, 2018 at 11:22am What was the immediate threat?
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39545 Gender:	Re: Not Small Hands Reply #63 - Dec 28^th, 2018 at 11:27am rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 11:22am: What was the immediate threat? The shithead who assaulted me. I made sure he did not get a 'second swing.'
Back to top	IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Not Small Hands
Reply #64 - Dec 28^th, 2018 at 11:44am

Aussie wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 11:27am:

rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 11:22am:

What was the immediate threat?

The shithead who assaulted me. I made sure he did not get a 'second swing.'

Doesnt pass the sniff test, you confronted the child after the event. Not necessary, also not necessary to physically restrain the child in order to request the childs details. Any prosecutor would have you on this. And you know it.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39545
Gender: male

Re: Not Small Hands
Reply #65 - Dec 28^th, 2018 at 12:18pm

rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 11:44am:

Aussie wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 11:27am:

rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 11:22am:

What was the immediate threat?

The shithead who assaulted me. I made sure he did not get a 'second swing.'

Doesnt pass the sniff test, you confronted the child after the event. Not necessary, also not necessary to physically restrain the child in order to request the childs details. Any prosecutor would have you on this. And you know it.

We don't have sniff tests in Court. I was assaulted and I neutralised the Threat to ensure he did not get a second go. He damaged my property. I 'arrested' him. I held him long enough to get his ID, give him a gob full bollocking and walked into the Teachers' Room.
Prosecute away...and bring your cheque book as you will get a costs order against you on my discharge.

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17179 Gender:	Re: Not Small Hands Reply #66 - Dec 28^th, 2018 at 10:00pm Now you are changing your story to claim he damaged your property. What property was damaged and what were the approximate cost of the damages? You still havent stated what immediate threat he presented.
Back to top	IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Not Small Hands
Reply #67 - Dec 28^th, 2018 at 10:18pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 9:14am:

Quote:

huhummm shes retrospecting it OZ....

and you said everyone comes under the ADULT LAW.. and thats no so.... Sad Sad Sad

They do......at the scene of the crime......later, they may be dealt with in different Courts.

funny I have seen where the press cannot print a persons name simply because they were a juvenile when they committed said crime.........

yet by the sound of that comment they can be tried as and when they reach 18..

your making it up you sad little person.....who thinks what he did was heroic and smart.......yet not too sure though about giving us all the relevant details name school year and so forth are you......????? maybe your not that sure after all...

as others have noted this story grows with the telling of it....now YOU ARRESTED HIM>>> Roll Eyes

a disabled boy accused of throwing a plastic bottle at a car...

is arrested by tough speaking big handed taxi driver..

who said! I was doing every citizen of this town a good turn.......

keeping the crime off the street... well almost......

school grounds are now safer thanks to meeeeee..

aussie FOR P.M...

only in qld... Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17179 Gender:	Re: Not Small Hands Reply #68 - Dec 28^th, 2018 at 10:34pm rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 10:00pm: Now you are changing your story to claim he damaged your property. What property was damaged and what were the approximate cost of the damages? You still havent stated what immediate threat he presented. What happened? Off to try and come up with another series of events?
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78245
Gender: male

Re: Not Small Hands
Reply #69 - Dec 29^th, 2018 at 6:56am

rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 10:34pm:

rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 10:00pm:

Now you are changing your story to claim he damaged your property. What property was damaged and what were the approximate cost of the damages? You still havent stated what immediate threat he presented.

What happened? Off to try and come up with another series of events?

maybe you should go back to page 1 and read the story again before making a fool of yourself

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36280 Gender:	Re: Not Small Hands Reply #70 - Dec 29^th, 2018 at 6:59am Ozpol should be renamed Auspol. Aussie is certainly the main topic of conversation.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39545
Gender: male

Re: Not Small Hands
Reply #71 - Dec 29^th, 2018 at 2:04pm

rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 10:00pm:

Now you are changing your story to claim he damaged your property. What property was damaged and what were the approximate cost of the damages?

I have always said that the bottle hit the Cab. It is hardly a surprise that damage was done. I paid a back yard panel repair bloke to fix it. It was less than $500.00, around $350.00 from memory. The additional loss is that the Cab was off the road while the damage was repaired.

Quote:

You still havent stated what immediate threat he presented.

Yes I have. The shithead who threw that bottle at me and missed....was the immediate threat. I am entitled to make sure he did not get a second opportunity.

Cods....nothing has changed. The event happened....all fact....nothing manufactured, and easy to recall.

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Not Small Hands
Reply #72 - Dec 29^th, 2018 at 2:09pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 29^th, 2018 at 2:04pm:

rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 10:00pm:

Now you are changing your story to claim he damaged your property. What property was damaged and what were the approximate cost of the damages?

I have always said that the bottle hit the Cab. It is hardly a surprise that damage was done. I paid a back yard panel repair bloke to fix it. It was less than $500.00, around $350.00 from memory. The additional loss is that the Cab was off the road while the damage was repaired.

Quote:

You still havent stated what immediate threat he presented.

Yes I have. The shithead who threw that bottle at me and missed....was the immediate threat. I am entitled to make sure he did not get a second opportunity.

Cods....nothing has changed. The event happened....all fact....nothing manufactured, and easy to recall.

Took you a while to come up with those new details. Would have thought you could just have related them off the top of your head yesterday if it was true. There was no immediate threat to yourself. You confronted the child and assaulted him. You have also now admitted to illegally detaining him, tsk tsk .

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Not Small Hands
Reply #73 - Dec 29^th, 2018 at 2:10pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 29^th, 2018 at 6:56am:

rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 10:34pm:

rhino wrote on Dec 28^th, 2018 at 10:00pm:

Now you are changing your story to claim he damaged your property. What property was damaged and what were the approximate cost of the damages? You still havent stated what immediate threat he presented.

What happened? Off to try and come up with another series of events?

maybe you should go back to page 1 and read the story again before making a fool of yourself

Your village is calling.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39545
Gender: male

Re: Not Small Hands
Reply #74 - Dec 29^th, 2018 at 2:27pm

Quote:

Took you a while to come up with those new details. Would have thought you could just have related them off the top of your head yesterday if it was true.

Why bore the schit out of people who could not care less about some arsehole being rightly and appropriately called to account. You dickheads want the warts and all version, and when I answer your silly juvenile questions, you go all "boo hoo, he's embellishing." Nah, I'm just telling it as it happened. If that farqs your agenda, I don't care.

Quote:

There was no immediate threat to yourself.

Oh yeah there was you retard. It was the shithead who just took his first potshot at me. I made sure he did not get a chance for a second, as is my legal right.

Quote:

You confronted the child and assaulted him.

I confronted my attacker and yes, I put my hand on his chest and moved/pushed him back a very short distance to a tree, where I held him with my hand on his chest. Sure, that is an assault, but it is an entirely lawful one.

Quote:

You have also now admitted to illegally detaining him, tsk tsk .

I absolutely deprived him of his liberty...detained him long enough to give him a gob full and get his ID details. Less than 30 seconds. Released him and reported the incident in full to the Teachers.

Anything else I can help you with?

(Cods...forgot to mention.....you keep referring to a disabled kid. There was no disabled kid involved. There was a very able bodied High School student and an old retired bloke who takes schit/actual physical attack from no-one....and that would include your ever so butter would not melt in his mouth 'grandson' if he did the same as that shithead.)

Back to top

IP Logged