Aussie wrote on Dec 27^th, 2018 at 12:20pm:



can you tell me where exactly those laws are applicable.??????....

the child did not assault you  in your first explanation of this crime every time you tell us what happened it changes.. it expands!  like now the child assaulted you...

then you try to make out this wasnt a child... what age was he.  first he hit your taxi then he damaged it....

and as far as I know every State terr. in this country would have you before a court if someone had reported this appalling episode........

dont forget aussie you were bragging  when you posted it.. noone doxxed you.....this is you bragging about the power you are convinced you have.....

you want to impress!    seriously as yet I havent seen anyone  back you up with any of the claims you made   you  were within your rights...to man handle this disabled child......   where do your best friends stand on this???  greg where are you?...  do you agree with your mentor....the one you always agree with  what about this one???...

just curious!

cods wrote on Dec 27^th, 2018 at 2:24pm:



Quote:


Nothing changes, cods...other than they way you want to present a simple set of facts by ignoring the relevant ones.  The Laws are contained in the Qld Criminal Code, cods, something I am far familiar with than you ever will be.

Quote:


It was not a child in the sense you and your idiot mates seek to portray.  It was a High School student, not some snotty nosed Primary School kid still in diapers and schitting in them.  Ask any High School student if they consider themself to be a 'child,' cods.

Quote:


And therein lies your problem.  So know sweet farq all about the Law.

Quote:


It was indirectly relevant to the Thread where I posted it.  This has SFA to do with doxxing, cods.   It is not about me bragging.  It is about the idiotic and criminal behaviour by retards, which I dealt with instantly and which the School dealt with ultimately....

Quote:


Ask Grappler.  What disabled child, cods?  There was no disabled child involved, cods.  I sure was 100% within my rights to deal with the shithead retard as I did.  He was lucky he attacked me and not other Cabbies who might have been far more stern with him, and still been well within their rights.

Cods, not even your Grandkid has the right to randomly assault me at his High School and damage my property...or do you assert that he does have that right, cods?

"I'm curoius."

cods wrote on Dec 27^th, 2018 at 3:09pm:


And Cods there is something Aussie doesn't want to address.

The child had been identified and all that was required was for the office to be notified for the same outcome.

What purpose was served by Aussie physically assaulting the child other than to vent his anger?

And another point.  He took the action on say so of other children.  What if they pointed out the wrong child?

Did Aussie check first if the child he pinned was a special needs child?  Nope.

What happened was Aussie lost his temper, yelled WHICH RETARD in the presence of special needs kids then physically assaulted a child, and he wants us to believe the school condoned all this.

The Reboot wrote on Dec 27^th, 2018 at 3:19pm:




I have only mentioned it in leu of this thread..  buit now you come to mention it..

he loves the attention....thats why he will never admit he was wrong..because then it all stops and goes away  he doesnt want that.....

he admits to being a bully...  wow....a bully is allowed to pick up disabled children.......that cant be right!

I await the fact on the laws in qld.....

because if they say its ok for anyone to man handle a child    as long as they have an excuse like throwing a can...then  I will be making a noise about it....

CRIMINAL CODE 1899 - SECT 245
assault
245 assault

    (1) A person who strikes, touches, or moves, or otherwise applies force of any kind to, the person of another, either directly or indirectly, without the other person’s consent, or with the other person’s consent if the consent is obtained by fraud, or who by any bodily act or gesture attempts or threatens to apply force of any kind to the person of another without the other person’s consent, under such circumstances that the person making the attempt or threat has actually or apparently a present ability to effect the person’s purpose, is said to assault that other person, and the act is called an
    "assault" .

    (2) In this section—

    "applies force" includes the case of applying heat, light, electrical force, gas, odour, or any other substance or thing whatever if applied in such a degree as to cause injury or personal discomfort.


Now cods...if your grandson had acted in that sort or retarded manner, would you agree that he was acting in a criminal fashion?  Or is he special?




if it wasnt so shameful  it would be hilarious


you are using SELF DEFENCE LAWS.....

I see not one word about children....I see not one word on disabled children....


[quote]Section 274 of the Criminal Code 1899 provides that it is lawful for a person to use reasonable force to resist a trespasser taking their property provided the person does not do grievous bodily harm to the trespasser.[/quote]


did this child trespass not really    you do not even know if it was the actually child that threw the can/bottle  you took another childs word for it.....

seriously would Qld self defence laws cover you.???...OMG>...

now of course we go into deflecting mode....

i would never agree anyones child acted in a criminal manner...  as a child I am sure I threw things    I am sure you did   but was never treated like a criminal...

and you sir had it been my grandson you man  handled  believe it   it would have gone further..

you would never be allowed within sc hool grounds ever again.. let alone get paid for it...

are you so convinced you are correct  and right..and have not a thing to fear from the law...

would you tell us the school and when this happened so it can be verified......????????..

I am sure you know the childs name as well....I know a teacher in Qld   I can ask them to verify if  at least taxis are still picking up disabled children......

I find that difficult to accept to be honest..

but if you think those law apply to children.....I would prefer laws on juveniles..

........

Cods, you take stupidity levels way off the meter.  Really.  It is no wonder you tell us about how argumentative your Mob is, and you have even as recently as this Christmas

cods wrote on Dec 27^th, 2018 at 4:45pm:


What is cods?  You did not answer the question either.  Why is that?


Quote:


That's right cods......even disabled children who assault others are fair game...provided the return is commensurate.  And....there was no disabled kid involved in this incident.  The only thing disabled here seems to be your capacity to read and accept the facts as they are given to you.  You prefer to just make them up.


Quote:


That was contained in the 'General' broad brush explanation from the Link.  It is not specifically relevant, but it is part of what happened indirectly...the arsehole damaged my property. And you do not give a stuff about that fact.

Quote:


Absolutely.

Quote:


Not once in my life have a thrown a heavy (or light) object at a person I did not know.  Have you cods?  If so...why did you do that?

Quote:


That's your problem.  You would have ignored his assault, his wilful damage to my property and gone all cuddly "there there Dear" instead of kicking the little schits arse.  Right there is telling, cods.

Quote:


Yes cods...sane, rational people would agree with me and what I did.  Idiots would encourage little schits to have another go at the Cabbies...the Ambos....the Coppers.....or any other adults there going lawfully about their business.

Quote:


Absolutely.  The School dealt with the student.  As they rightly ought to have done.  If I had gone to the Cops, the schit head, not me, would have been in Court.

Quote:


Sure, I'll exchange that detail with you as soon as you give me all your details, and those of your Family so I can get Canberra authorities to check your lot out, carefully.

Quote:


Of course, you do.  You find anything, almost everything (unless it's about you and your view) 'hard to accept to be honest.'

Quote:


Laws apply to everyone cods, including arsehole High School students who randomly assault people and damage their property.

John Smith wrote on Dec 27^th, 2018 at 5:22pm:


Sounds like a plan.