John Smith wrote on Dec 26
th, 2018 at 8:32pm:
Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 26
th, 2018 at 8:19pm:
John Smith wrote on Dec 26
th, 2018 at 8:11pm:
you're splitting hairs. The only reason to threaten to 'report' is to threaten a ban, either directly or implicitly
and lets get real here. You weren't really 'reporting' anything, you were talking about yourself and your other identity with access to the ban buttons.
Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 26
th, 2018 at 8:00pm:
If he got a ban it would have been for releasing PM data as you well know from the other thread.
no, I do not 'well know' since despite you repeatedly making the claim, you failed to prove it. Your comment clearly threatened him for harassment
Quote:If not I might have to advise Set that I see this as harassment.
I learned from Gregg.
Yes, it was a way to advise him to drop it.
You also might want to consider this...
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1343785142 especially post #2.
perc isn't a moderator here anymore. In the link you provided he says FD may or may not agree with him.
Quote:FD & other Mods may or may not agree, But I very much doubt that a categorical set of written rules is possible &/or enforceable, in the real world of these forums.
what is anyone supposed to make of that?
As a current member I would disregard any ad hoc rules made up 6 years ago by someone who is no longer here that the current owner and management may or may not agree with. I would just look to rules on the
'rule page' ... after all, you can't seriously any members since that was posted to scroll through 6 years of posts just in case they may find something relevant?
besides, what has Percs rules from 6 years ago about personal criticism got to do with you threatening Greg for harassment?
Just so we're clear Set, and be careful because your answer
may will come back to bite you in the arse, is harassment against the rules or not?
FD linked it to the rules so he must agree with it.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1172571481 Click "Personal criticism".
Feel free to disregard whatever you like.
From that page
Quote:For a starter, there are different circumstances regarding -
1) The severity of incidents, which may well range from quite minor, to absolutely abhorrent!
2) The frequency of incidents, which could range from the only time a particular member has strayed, to harassing a member at almost every post, to just harassing everyone, every post!
Gregg has been on Bobby's back for years over this. It's no different to member(s) being suspended for continually telling cods she's on the metho etc.
And from post #2
Quote:However, should this occur & one of the Moderators deem such behaviour to be inappropriate, then you may face a suspension, so please bear that in mind, before you push that button!
You should get over it. Gregg is apparently a big boy not a snowflake that would melt at a warning.