Australian Politics Forum - Re: Why should we

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36398 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #75 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:36pm rhino wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:31pm: awwww, this thread has it all. Pecca trying to gaslight Cu. Mothra and Smithie virtual signalling. Pass me the popcorn. I see your perception and analytical skills have not improved in my absence. No surprises.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36398 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #76 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:36pm double post
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #77 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:39pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:29pm:

I did not threaten a ban for harassing Bobby as has been pointed out many times to no avail,

you keep claiming, but i already put up the evidence to the contrary. Your pretending that it was you simply going to log out as choo choo and come back as set, just to cry about greg harassing bobby simply doesn't wash. Only a fool would believe that was anything but a threat.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:29pm:

How many times Bobby said any thing matters not, Bobby allowed Gregg to post any PMs.

after about 4 or5 years of declining permission you mean? when he finally conceded? After having apparently being told by greg that the pms were deleted?

How convenient.

if it wasn't true, he should have agreed years ago, and you would probably have never heard of it again. Instead he fed the beast and now you're still crying about it Cry

.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:29pm:

Why am I butt hurt? I'm not.

the fact that you follow greg around hounding him suggests otherwise ...but what would i know

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:29pm:

Now he is starting again with the same shyte. It's Gregg not me that is at fault here.

no, it's you who tried to shove your weight around. Greg is free to post what he likes, to any other member here, within the confines of the rules. Just because you're a moderator that doesn't give you the right to dictate what he can and can't say.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #78 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:39pm

mothra wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:34pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:29pm:

I did not threaten a ban for harassing Bobby as has been pointed out many times to no avail, the threat of a ban was for discussing what was in PMs.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 8:59pm:

If not I might have to advise Set that I see this as harassment.

The above is what i'm arcing up about. And i have been met with abuse and hostility for doing so.

I don't give a rat's Mothra. I did not give harassment as a reason for banning but hte disclosure of PMs.

Keep your own probs out of the argument unless you too disclose PMs. Make your own thread of woe. The warning was to Gregg for you know what.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36398
Gender: female

Re: Why should we
Reply #79 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:42pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:39pm:

mothra wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:34pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:29pm:

I did not threaten a ban for harassing Bobby as has been pointed out many times to no avail, the threat of a ban was for discussing what was in PMs.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 8:59pm:

If not I might have to advise Set that I see this as harassment.

The above is what i'm arcing up about. And i have been met with abuse and hostility for doing so.

I don't give a rat's Mothra. I did not give harassment as a reason for banning but hte disclosure of PMs.

Keep your own probs out of the argument unless you too disclose PMs. Make your own thread of woe. The warning was to Gregg for you know what.

For what other reason would CC need to "contact Set about harassment" if it weren't to issue a ban?

Does Set have other powers to which we are all ignorant?

And precious, much more has been said about your problems with me in this thread than my problems with you ... best not try to play that card, eh?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #80 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:43pm [quote ]If not I might have to advise Set that I see this as harassment . [/quote] funny, but i see no mention of 'disclosing contents of a pm'?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #81 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:44pm mothra wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:42pm: For what other reason would CC need to "contact Set about harassment" if it weren't to issue a ban? maybe he needed additional support from the naughty greg?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36398 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #82 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:44pm John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:43pm: [quote ]If not I might have to advise Set that I see this as harassment . funny, but i see no mention of 'disclosing contents of a pm'? [/quote] Indeed. That has been my question from the start. I keep having to duck projectiles though.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36398 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #83 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:45pm John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:44pm: mothra wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:42pm: For what other reason would CC need to "contact Set about harassment" if it weren't to issue a ban? maybe he needed additional support from the naughty greg? Oh he's usually got a pack handy.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #84 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:45pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:39pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:29pm:

I did not threaten a ban for harassing Bobby as has been pointed out many times to no avail,

you keep claiming, bu i already put up the evidence to the contrary. Your pretending that it was you going to cry to log out as choo choo and come back as set doesn't wash. Only a fool would believe that load of rubbish was anything but a threat.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:29pm:

How many times Bobby said any thing matters not, Bobby allowed Gregg to post any PMs.

after about 4 or5 years of declining permission you mean? when he finally conceded? After having apparently being told by greg that the pms were deleted?

How convenient.

if it wasn't true, he should have agreed years ago, and you would probably have never heard of it again. Instead he fed the beast and now you're still crying about it Cry

.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:29pm:

Why am I butt hurt? I'm not.

the fact that you follow greg around hounding him suggests otherwise ...but what would i know

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:29pm:

Now he is starting again with the same shyte. It's Gregg not me that is at fault here.

no, it's you who tried to shove your weight around. Greg is free to post what he likes, to any other member here, within the confines of the rules. Just because you're a moderator that doesn't give you the right to dictate what he can and can't say.

He is not free to disclose what he says are PMs. Since a simple ask at the start has turned into this, I will ban him for months the next time he does it. It could have been so simple if he listened and stopped but he and you lot of cheergirls turned it into this, fine. Gregg, you are on notice, one more claim of releasing PM info...

Back to top

IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #85 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:51pm

mothra wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:45pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:44pm:

mothra wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:42pm:

For what other reason would CC need to "contact Set about harassment" if it weren't to issue a ban?

maybe he needed additional support from the naughty greg?

Oh he's usually got a pack handy.

A pack? Hehe, look at the pack talking to each other.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 56947
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #86 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:56pm

OMG - what a friggin laugh Grin

The terrible trio have escaped the prison vortex of Monk's dismal Political (soapies) Forum, like it was a bad smell.
They've rushed here to the green pastures of this Forum and immediately continued on where they left off before being banned. Roll Eyes

The three Scorpions approached the stream's edge. There they asked a Frog, sitting on an Indian log nearby. "Could you please allow us to crawl upon your back so that you may safely take us to the other side?"

The Frog responded "Why do you wish to voyage across to the other side - what's wrong with the one you are on?"

The three Scorpions in unison answered "Because this side is an empty place and we are going hungry and will die, if we stay."

The Frog thought a bit, leaped into the stream waters and frog-stroked up to the edge where the Scorpions were waiting, half-accepting - but cautiously he asked "If I allow you to jump on my back for me to take you across the water - you three will sting me!"

"Oh no - we promise. Why would we sting you to die? That would most certainly mean we would drown to death. How ever could we reach the other side, if we did that? We will not sting you!"
they promised.
Convinced, the Frog touched the edge and allowed the three Scorpions to crawl onto his back. He began to reach the halfway mark of the stream and suddenly he felt a terrible pain in three points of his back. In agony he shouted at the three Scorpions "Why did thou sting me in the back, when thee promised not to? Now surely I will die and you will all die too by drowning!"

The three scorpions just said in unison "It's our nature."

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 154366 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #87 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 12:34am rhino wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:31pm: awwww, this thread has it all. Pecca trying to gaslight Cu. Mothra and Smithie virtual signalling. Pass me the popcorn. Pretty good, hey? Are we witnessing CC's 19th nervous breakdown in real time?
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Setanta

Gold Member

Offline

\/ Peace man!

Posts: 17391
Northern NSW
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #88 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 12:41am

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 12:34am:

rhino wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:31pm:

awwww, this thread has it all. Pecca trying to gaslight Cu. Mothra and Smithie virtual signalling. Pass me the popcorn.

Pretty good, hey?

Are we witnessing CC's 19th nervous breakdown in real time?

More like Gregg's 19th back down. What was that you said about Bobby, Gregg? Remember you won't be told what to do by me. Care to reiterate what Bobby PMed you? Don't let me hold you down gurl, go for it.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jasin Gold Member Offline Posts: 56947 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #89 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 12:42am Freediver's Merry Christmas present to the Forum by unbanning John Smith, Mothra, Monk and not banning GreggaryPeccary and Aussie. Is more like "MERRY CHRISTMAS MR LAWRENCE!"
Back to top	« Last Edit: Dec 24^th, 2018 at 12:57am by Jasin » is__2_.jpg (9 KB \| 17 ) AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY. IP Logged