Australian Politics Forum - Re: Why should we

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #45 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:44pm Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:39pm: I threatened banning for releasing PM information. bullshit............... Mr integrity Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 8:59pm: f not I might have to advise Set that I see this as harassment.
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #46 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:48pm

mothra wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:43pm:

I'm not talking about Greg. Can you please stop obsessing over Greg?

This is about you doing absolutely nothing while i was harassed to the point of torment. Not. A. Thing. Even though i begged you.

Now all of a sudden, a massively more trivial example pops up and you're Clint Eastwood?

It's not about you at all. This about Gregg and his harassment of Bobby, this started with Gregg claiming poof PMs from Bobby, again. If you have a problem, this is not the place.

Back to top

IP Logged

Cu Chulainn Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2135 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #47 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:49pm greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:43pm: Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:39pm: Gregg would sacrifice you in a sec if he thought you were not on his side. Ask Aussie. How would I sacrifice them? I'm curious. What did you say to Aussie?
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #48 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:49pm

mothra wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:43pm:

I'm not talking about Greg. Can you please stop obsessing over Greg?

that would require him to focus on his own actions ... we can't have that or he'd have to ban himself for harassing Greg.

Only a low life scum would abuse their position by threatening to ban someone just because they didn't like them

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36398
Gender: female

Re: Why should we
Reply #49 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:49pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:48pm:

mothra wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:43pm:

I'm not talking about Greg. Can you please stop obsessing over Greg?

This is about you doing absolutely nothing while i was harassed to the point of torment. Not. A. Thing. Even though i begged you.

Now all of a sudden, a massively more trivial example pops up and you're Clint Eastwood?

It's not about you at all. This about Gregg and his harassment of Bobby, this started with Gregg claiming poof PMs from Bobby, again. If you have a problem, this is not the place.

Again, i'm not talking about Greg. I'm asking you about what clearly seems to be your inconsistency and you throwing your weight around when it suits you.

Again, not driven by integrity, morality or ethics.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #50 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:51pm Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:48pm: If you have a problem, this is not the place. a cop out, even for you
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #51 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:52pm Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:49pm: Gregg would sacrifice you in a sec if he thought you were not on his side. Ask Aussie. you mean like you do when you threaten to ban everyone for daring to question your call? have you been taking the stupid pill?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #52 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:54pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:44pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:39pm:

I threatened banning for releasing PM information.

bullshit............... Mr integrity

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 8:59pm:

f not I might have to advise Set that I see this as harassment.

Ah, so notifying of harassment it the reason for a ban? Good one John. You're as cluey as Mothra. Geeze after so many months of Greggs pedantry you'd think you might get something right.

Anyway, Aussie told me I have the buttons and I should use them, FD be damned. Do you hold the same opinion?

Back to top

IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #53 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:55pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:52pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:49pm:

Gregg would sacrifice you in a sec if he thought you were not on his side. Ask Aussie.

you mean like you do when you threaten to ban everyone for daring to question your call? Grin

have you been taking the stupid pill?

Yep, I'm a banner if there ever was one. So what's your opinion on Gregg disclosing PMs?

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #54 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:57pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:54pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:44pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:39pm:

I threatened banning for releasing PM information.

bullshit............... Mr integrity

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 8:59pm:

f not I might have to advise Set that I see this as harassment.

Ah, so notifying of harassment it the reason for a ban? Good one John. You're as cluey as Mothra. Geeze after so many months of Greggs pedantry you'd think you might get something right.

Anyway, Aussie told me I have the buttons and I should use them, FD be damned. Do you hold the same opinion?

you can back peddle all you like, it won't stop you looking like a lying hypocrite.

and I don't give a flying fook what you do with the buttons. You can shove them up your arse for all i care

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #55 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:00pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:55pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:52pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:49pm:

Gregg would sacrifice you in a sec if he thought you were not on his side. Ask Aussie.

you mean like you do when you threaten to ban everyone for daring to question your call? Grin

have you been taking the stupid pill?

Yep, I'm a banner if there ever was one. So what's your opinion on Gregg disclosing PMs?

did he?? what exactly did he disclose? the rules say he isn't allowed to disclose the CONTENTS of a PM. No rule against disclosing that there was a PM. Especially since that information is public information for anyone who cares to look anyway

at least not yet anyway, by the time this evening's over who knows how many more rules you'll create just to 'win'

while we're at it, do the same rules apply to everyone? or just greg?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #56 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:05pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:57pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:54pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:44pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:39pm:

I threatened banning for releasing PM information.

bullshit............... Mr integrity

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 8:59pm:

f not I might have to advise Set that I see this as harassment.

Ah, so notifying of harassment it the reason for a ban? Good one John. You're as cluey as Mothra. Geeze after so many months of Greggs pedantry you'd think you might get something right.

Anyway, Aussie told me I have the buttons and I should use them, FD be damned. Do you hold the same opinion?

you can back peddle all you like, it won't stop you looking like a lying hypocrite.

and I don't give a flying fook what you do with the buttons. You can shove them up your arse for all i care

So asking if Gregg can release PM information and use it against someone is backpedalling? How so? You've been far too long in cryogenics with Mothra at Monk's it seems. Is it OK if I do the same? I have some snazzy info in my PMs. It's either OK or it's not, which side do you stand on? Mothra? Your views? You can't have it both ways.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154202
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #57 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:05pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:43pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:39pm:

Gregg would sacrifice you in a sec if he thought you were not on his side. Ask Aussie.

How would I sacrifice them?

I'm curious.

What did you say to Aussie?

Don't answer questions with questions, sunshine.

How would I sacrifice them?

I'm curious.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #58 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:08pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:00pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:55pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:52pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:49pm:

Gregg would sacrifice you in a sec if he thought you were not on his side. Ask Aussie.

you mean like you do when you threaten to ban everyone for daring to question your call? Grin

have you been taking the stupid pill?

Yep, I'm a banner if there ever was one. So what's your opinion on Gregg disclosing PMs?

did he?? what exactly did he disclose? the rules say he isn't allowed to disclose the CONTENTS of a PM. No rule against disclosing that there was a PM. Especially since that information is public information for anyone who cares to look anyway

at least not yet anyway, by the time this evening's over who knows how many more rules you'll create just to 'win'

while we're at it, do the same rules apply to everyone? or just greg?

We have well and truly been over what Gregg claimed the "contents" of PMs were. That he claimed they were the "contents" of PMs is enough. Your partisanship is disgraceful.

Back to top

IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #59 - Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:10pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 11:05pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:43pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:39pm:

Gregg would sacrifice you in a sec if he thought you were not on his side. Ask Aussie.

How would I sacrifice them?

I'm curious.