Australian Politics Forum - Re: Why should we

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #180 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:25pm you keep telling yourself that anyone got called in if it helps you sleep, since we both know reality and you have long since parted ways Afterall, it couldn't possibly be that people were independently appalled by your bullshit threats now could it set?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154510
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #181 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:28pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:14pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:08pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:00pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 9:39pm:

It's f@#$cking pathetic

ohhh, avoiding the swear filter. A select few get banned for that. I guess it's lucky for you that the rules don't apply to you eh Set. Roll Eyes

So you know what @#$ translates too? Far cough.<-- Aussie's favourite. I guess they don't apply to him either. You want to try? Grin

ohh, I'm scared. Grin

tell me, how does your highlighting further discrepancies with the standard of moderation help you? If anything it highlights just how selective you are about applying / making up the rules, depending on whether you like the person or not.

Lol

Set gets owned again.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #182 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:32pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:22pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:14pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:08pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:00pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 9:39pm:

It's f@#$cking pathetic

ohhh, avoiding the swear filter. A select few get banned for that. I guess it's lucky for you that the rules don't apply to you eh Set. Roll Eyes

So you know what @#$ translates too? Far cough.<-- Aussie's favourite. I guess they don't apply to him either. You want to try? Grin

ohh, I'm scared. Grin

tell me, how does your highlighting further discrepancies with the standard of moderation help you? If anything it highlights just how selective you are about applying / making up the rules, depending on whether you like the person or not.

Too scared to give it a go? It's easy, ask Aussie, he'll show you how to do it if you can't work it out. Here, try this one, far queue.

If i was scared I wouldn't have sworn at you the half dozen or so times I already did since we started this conversation last night. I'll swear when I want to, not because some idiot thinks he can goad me.

I also find it interesting that instead of responding to what is said, your usual response is to deflect to 'aussie' or 'mothra' or anyone else you can use to avoid having to give a straight answer. Whats the matter? you need someone to hide behind big boy?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39872
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #183 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:33pm

Quote:

I have warned or advised people when they are getting a bit close to the line.

Fuzzball clearly crossed the line....not merely got close to it. And all you can come up with is a wet lettuce. Yet, last night, you were making numerous outright threats, especially to Peccarry, that you WOULD ban him unless he tugged his forelock to you.

So....why are we not seeing the same treatment for Fuzzball? (Don't give me crap about not having a little clique. You have been currying favour with the likes of Gordon and AiA et al.)

I also note that contrary to your suggestion that he cover up his crime, he has left it stand as is. So...where to now Choo Choo? Is Peccarry free to refer to Bobby's alleged "poofy" PMs, or is Fuzzball banned? You cannot play it both ways and hold any high ground especially on integrity and consistency.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #184 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:37pm Aussie wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:33pm: and hold any high ground especially on integrity and consistency. please, he has no idea what the word means
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

rhino Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17179 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #185 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:40pm Isnt openly discussing and debating moderators decisions against forum rules. Mods, take action please
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39872
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #186 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:40pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:18pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:11pm:

Quote:

I agree. What Gregg alleged was not just a poofy PM with no other context. It was that Bobby wanted to have sexual relations with him. You see the difference?

There is none. Look:

Choo choo sent me a threatening PM. (One learns from that that the PM contained something of a threatening kind.)

Choo Choo sent me a propositioning PM. (One learns from that that the PM contained a proposition of poofy kind.)

Same same, and both breach MY version of proper way to interpret the Rule.

I don't have to go through the silly hoops you place in your own way. I am consistent. You are not, and this recent outbreak by you (especially given the apparent Fuzzball wet lettuce for his paedo reference to Peccarry of this evening) shows demonstrably that you are targeting Peccarry because he is not in your dumb arse cheer squad. Fuzzball is, so he gets a cuddle with the wet lettuce.

I didn't ban piggy, I didn't ban fuzz, I haven't imposed a ban since that post in feedback. I have warned or advised people when they are getting a bit close to the line. Only piggy has got butt hurt over it and called in his chihuahuas to pee on my leg. Mr "don't tell me what to do" only has himself to blame for upping the ante.

As for cheer squad, I don't have a clique that I belong to, unlike you and piggy.

You did not deal with this:

Quote:

Choo choo sent me a threatening PM. (One learns from that that the PM contained something of a threatening kind.)

Choo Choo sent me a propositioning PM. (One learns from that that the PM contained a proposition of poofy kind.)

Same same, and both breach MY version of proper way to interpret the Rule.

Well, you may have in your own weazally way by posting that you did not ban Peccary despite your Threats that he (Setanta) would.

So...does he now have the green light from you to refer to Bobby's PM in a descriptive way (as we have been discussing) provided he does not reveal the actual contents.......even imaginary PMs?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:48pm by Aussie »

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39872 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #187 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:41pm rhino wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:40pm: Isnt openly discussing and debating moderators decisions against forum rules. Mods, take action please Not here it isn't you dickhead doxxer. It is in Feedback.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 154510 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #188 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:41pm rhino wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:40pm: Isnt openly discussing and debating moderators decisions against forum rules. Mods, take action please http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/forum-rules.html
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Cu Chulainn Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2135 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #189 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:51pm rhino wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:40pm: Isnt openly discussing and debating moderators decisions against forum rules. Mods, take action please I've never had a problem discussing mine.
Back to top	IP Logged

rhino Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17179 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #190 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 10:29pm Aussie wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:41pm: rhino wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:40pm: Isnt openly discussing and debating moderators decisions against forum rules. Mods, take action please Not here it isn't you dickhead doxxer. It is in Feedback. Personal attack. Mods?
Back to top	IP Logged

rhino Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17179 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #191 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 10:30pm Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:51pm: rhino wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 9:40pm: Isnt openly discussing and debating moderators decisions against forum rules. Mods, take action please I've never had a problem discussing mine. Breaking the rules. How dare you.
Back to top	IP Logged

rhino Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17179 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #192 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 10:31pm Arsie, please stop sending me threatening PMs.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 57067
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #193 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 10:46pm

Ha! Look at Cu Chullain go!

There he is, all alone. Fighting off a good number of them who belong to Monkey Mania Forum. Aussie, GP, JS, Mothra.

Smith Chips whinges on about Set/Cu having his clique crew here. But Cu doesn't need me to hold his hand. Besides easily beating off anything they throw at him, I'm sure he is more than capable of looking after himself. We'll leave G

im

P and Smith Chips to hold each other's hands together.

Poor Smith Chips must be a bit nervous of Gordo, Hammer, Karnal, Longy, Term Dog, Ye Grappler, Valkie and more suddenly appear to have a go at him. Grin

Man, what a Boofhead that JS is.

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Cu Chulainn Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2135 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #194 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 10:51pm rhino wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 10:31pm: Arsie, please stop sending me threatening PMs. Damn, I can't find that user or I might've had to have a word on the side with him.
Back to top	IP Logged