Australian Politics Forum - Re: Why should we

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #150 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:51pm

[This is going to look pretty bizarre and out of context. Setanta has split a Thread in General where he started a shitfight, and he has split some stuff off from that Thread (Why should we) to commence this one...on the evening of Xmas Eve, 2018. Mod.]

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:15pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 23^rd, 2018 at 10:12pm:

Not taking your bait after what I have seen at the Drunk Monk's place, forgive my enlightenment.

Just going back over the thread, and I'm not sure how I missed this one. Is this harassement choo choo? Shouldn't you get Set out now to deal with it? Afterall, this is what choo choo says about harassement

Quote:

If not I might have to advise Set that I see this as harassment.

the problem with riding the high horse and lecturing others set, is that sooner or later someone will hold to your own standards

How would it be you dimwit? I saw Gregg bring up again something long done away with that showed Gregg to be a liar to harass Bobby again using breach of PM rule. Peccary should have just taken the warning but alas he's not bright enough to do that. Live with it and get over yourself. If you want to continue, perhaps you could make a thread in Rels.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 24^th, 2018 at 7:12pm by Mod. »

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #151 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:53pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:16pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:57pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:55pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:49pm:

You yourself have accused people of releasing PM info when they say you have threatened them, keep it consistent. You then posted the PM you sent to show what you said was not threatening. I'd say telling everyone that someone PMed you for "good times" is releasing the content even if not in the exact words. Get over it anyway, I don't answer to you or the others, all you get to do is whinge and moan.

you bloody hypocrite. I've lost count of the number of times you've previously tried to back aussie into a corner by mentioning his pm's. Tell me, did 'Set' threaten 'choo choo' in those cases? Or do your own rules not apply to you ?

Any links?

I don't have any....but everyone here would assert that you have posted that I have sent you PMs complaining about Rule breaches. Do you admit you have made posts of that kind??

Any links?

ohh please. You used to be better than that. Now you want to pretend you've never mentioned Aussies PM's? Grin

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #152 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:53pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:47pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:16pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:57pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:55pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:49pm:

You yourself have accused people of releasing PM info when they say you have threatened them, keep it consistent. You then posted the PM you sent to show what you said was not threatening. I'd say telling everyone that someone PMed you for "good times" is releasing the content even if not in the exact words. Get over it anyway, I don't answer to you or the others, all you get to do is whinge and moan.

you bloody hypocrite. I've lost count of the number of times you've previously tried to back aussie into a corner by mentioning his pm's. Tell me, did 'Set' threaten 'choo choo' in those cases? Or do your own rules not apply to you ?

Any links?

I don't have any....but everyone here would assert that you have posted that I have sent you PMs complaining about Rule breaches. Do you admit you have made posts of that kind??

Any links?

Are you not reading, or pissed already? I said that I had no links. If you want to deny what I allege, go right ahead. You and I both know that I do not lie.

Sure I read it. Why would I deny you said you had no links? I believe you.

Back to top

IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #153 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:55pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:53pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:16pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:57pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:55pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:49pm:

You yourself have accused people of releasing PM info when they say you have threatened them, keep it consistent. You then posted the PM you sent to show what you said was not threatening. I'd say telling everyone that someone PMed you for "good times" is releasing the content even if not in the exact words. Get over it anyway, I don't answer to you or the others, all you get to do is whinge and moan.

you bloody hypocrite. I've lost count of the number of times you've previously tried to back aussie into a corner by mentioning his pm's. Tell me, did 'Set' threaten 'choo choo' in those cases? Or do your own rules not apply to you ?

Any links?

I don't have any....but everyone here would assert that you have posted that I have sent you PMs complaining about Rule breaches. Do you admit you have made posts of that kind??

Any links?

ohh please. You used to be better than that. Now you want to pretend you've never mentioned Aussies PM's? Grin

No links still? You seem sure of your accusation, surely you have the links.

Back to top

IP Logged

Cu Chulainn Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2135 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #154 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:57pm Aussie. Are you going to deny you have claimed abuse of PMs by someone who said you threatened them via PM? Yes or no will do.
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #155 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:57pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:51pm:

How would it be you dimwit?

how would what be idiot?

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:51pm:

I saw Gregg bring up again something long done away with that showed Gregg to be a liar to harass Bobby again using breach of PM rule.

no, you saw another opportunity to try and bully Greg with your imaginary rules

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:51pm:

Live with it and get over yourself. If you want to continue, perhaps you could make a thread in Rels.

and if I don't? what? you'll threaten to ban me too? Is this another rule being made up on the hop? Grin

good luck with that. You made your comments here so I'll continue here.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #156 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 7:00pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:55pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:53pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:16pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:57pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:55pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:49pm:

You yourself have accused people of releasing PM info when they say you have threatened them, keep it consistent. You then posted the PM you sent to show what you said was not threatening. I'd say telling everyone that someone PMed you for "good times" is releasing the content even if not in the exact words. Get over it anyway, I don't answer to you or the others, all you get to do is whinge and moan.

you bloody hypocrite. I've lost count of the number of times you've previously tried to back aussie into a corner by mentioning his pm's. Tell me, did 'Set' threaten 'choo choo' in those cases? Or do your own rules not apply to you ?

Any links?

I don't have any....but everyone here would assert that you have posted that I have sent you PMs complaining about Rule breaches. Do you admit you have made posts of that kind??

Any links?

ohh please. You used to be better than that. Now you want to pretend you've never mentioned Aussies PM's? Grin

No links still? You seem sure of your accusation, surely you have the links.

No, no links........... I haven't been here for over a year. You're not that important that I'm going to memorise what thread you make each post in. That doesn't mean that you didn't say it. If you had any integrity left you'd at least be honest about what you said but I don't think you are capable of it any more.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39875
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #157 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 7:00pm

Quote:

No links still? You seem sure of your accusation, surely you have the links.

There is nothing wrong with my memory, not that of Mr Smith's.....and if you want to get a comment from the anti Aussie brigade, just ask AiA, or even Agnes. They both have commented on your Aussie/PM posts. In any event, when I get home to my own desktop computer, I'll take the time to attempt to locate them Choo Choo. Of course, it would be far more simple if you conceded Mr Smith's point. He is right. I know it, and I suspect you know it.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #158 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 7:02pm Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:57pm: Aussie. Are you going to deny you have claimed abuse of PMs by someone who said you threatened them via PM? Yes or no will do.
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Cu Chulainn

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2135
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #159 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 7:04pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:57pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:51pm:

How would it be you dimwit?

how would what be idiot?

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:51pm:

I saw Gregg bring up again something long done away with that showed Gregg to be a liar to harass Bobby again using breach of PM rule.

no, you saw another opportunity to try and bully Greg with your imaginary rules

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:51pm:

Live with it and get over yourself. If you want to continue, perhaps you could make a thread in Rels.

and if I don't? what? you'll threaten to ban me too? Is this another rule being made up on the hop? Grin

good luck with that. You made your comments here so I'll continue here.

So you're going with Gregg the poor victimised innocent? Good luck with that. I'm sure you have a long list of my victimisation of him.

I guess I'll just split the thread then.

Back to top

IP Logged

Fuzzball

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 6384
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #160 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 7:05pm

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:52pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:18pm:

I don't at all feel that way John or I would run hiding from him, it's quite the opposite.

bullshit. You're so threatened. It's obvious by the way you target him

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:18pm:

You feel free to hold your concept of releasing the contents of PMs. I'll hold mine, guess what, it's mine that matters, not yours.

except there is no 'concept' of what 'contents are except for those that are trying to spin bullshit. The rules are even written in plain English to try and make it as simple as possible.

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:18pm:

This could all have been avoided if Gregg took the warning

you mean your threat that he abide by imaginary rules that you make up and that only apply to him? I don't blame him, he was a lot nicer to you than I would have been had i been in his shoes

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 5:18pm:

You can bitch and moan 'til the cows come home but it means nothing to me and I won't be listening.

of course you don't listen, doing so would require you to admit you tried to bully him. We can't have that now can we Roll Eyes

My god, now we have the village idiot back............g'd day John.....missed you so fvvken much.....must get those sights sighted-in on my water pistol...........

Back to top

Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting,
"Holy Sh!t ... What a Ride!"

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #161 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 7:12pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 7:04pm:

John Smith wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:57pm:

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:51pm:

How would it be you dimwit?

how would what be idiot?

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:51pm:

I saw Gregg bring up again something long done away with that showed Gregg to be a liar to harass Bobby again using breach of PM rule.

no, you saw another opportunity to try and bully Greg with your imaginary rules

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:51pm:

Live with it and get over yourself. If you want to continue, perhaps you could make a thread in Rels.

and if I don't? what? you'll threaten to ban me too? Is this another rule being made up on the hop? Grin

good luck with that. You made your comments here so I'll continue here.

So you're going with Gregg the poor victimised innocent? Good luck with that. I'm sure you have a long list of my victimisation of him.

I guess I'll just split the thread then.

no, I'm going with choo choo, or setanta (whichever you are today), the poor lying hypocrite! Do what you must, afterall, you are the one with the power. (I bet that gets you all wet with excitement just thinking about it to).

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39875
Gender: male

Re: Why should we
Reply #162 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 7:20pm

Cu Chulainn wrote on Dec 24^th, 2018 at 6:57pm:

Aussie. Are you going to deny you have claimed abuse of PMs by someone who said you threatened them via PM?

Yes or no will do.

I have already said that I did. That is the whole point!!!!! I complained publicly and privately even to you...and NOTHING WAS DONE by you...so I posted the PM which proved the person making the allegation a complete liar....and you still did nothing.

Ergo...conclusion...precedent...it is not an offence to allegedly describe a PM provided you don't post the actual content.

Farq me dead. Are you pissed?

Back to top

IP Logged

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: Why should we Reply #163 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 8:01pm groooooooooooan another marathon 5 hours baying for blood or something.. I would have thought Christmas Eve you would have all had something better to do.... sadly apparently not!
Back to top	IP Logged

Fuzzball Gold Member Offline Posts: 6384 Australia Gender:	Re: Why should we Reply #164 - Dec 24^th, 2018 at 8:06pm Well wtf would you expect.......now god's gift to the school of fvvkwits have returned......Enjoy FD......you brought them back........they'll own you....
Back to top	Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting, "Holy Sh!t ... What a Ride!" IP Logged