Australian Politics Forum - Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate

juliar Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 22966	Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate Reply #60 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 12:22pm The Polly Waffle VIRUS strikes again with more Fake News - his speciality.
Back to top	IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate
Reply #61 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 12:47pm

Its time wrote on Nov 21^st, 2018 at 10:31pm:

Labor will wedge Liberals in about thirty seconds over this

It will be interesting seeing the Coalition and it's scum bag supporters trying to justify not supporting a Federal Corruption Commission when Labor and the Greens are all for it....What argument can the Coalition use to prosecute such a position....Is it not necessary because Federal Politicians can be trusted and only the left are corrupt anyway....How do you right wingers justify a complete lack of scrutiny and accountability....Over to any right winger to answer this question???

Huh

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 19704 Gender:	Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate Reply #62 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:24pm philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 12:47pm: Over to any right winger to answer this question??? I guess that makes me not a right winger, despite claims by some. Bugger. Not of the left, not of the right - I must be a centrist.
Back to top	IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate
Reply #63 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm

lee wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:24pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 12:47pm:

Over to any right winger to answer this question???

I guess that makes me not a right winger, despite claims by some. Bugger. Not of the left, not of the right - I must be a centrist. Wink

No you are just a dickhead in denial....If you do not want to answer the question why bother pretending your opinion is at all relevant....You have nothing to offer any debate apart from bullshit....You are also very deceitful when you cut out the context of people's post and address irrelevancies whilst ignoring the main point in people's posts....Says a lot about you dickhead!!!

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19704
Gender: male

Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate
Reply #64 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:26pm

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

No you are just a dickhead in denial....If you do not want to answer the question why bother pretending your opinion is at all relevant...

Poor phil. Showing his lack of comprehension AGAIN.

lee wrote on Nov 21^st, 2018 at 2:01pm:

BTW - I do support a Corruption Commission. They are just two different questions.

Question answered.

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

You have nothing to offer any debate apart from bullshit.

Sorry. I posted rebuttals to your posts. Did you bother to read past the headlines?

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

You are also very deceitful when you cut out the context of people's post and address irrelevancies whilst ignoring the main point in people's posts.

You mean like when you talk a crime weather (sic) punitive or not? The whole point of your post seemed to be about punitive actions. How can that be irrelevant?

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

Says a lot about you dickhead!!!

Says more about your grasp of the English language. Or lack thereof. Wink

Back to top

« Last Edit: Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:32pm by lee »

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate
Reply #65 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:36pm

lee wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:26pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

No you are just a dickhead in denial....If you do not want to answer the question why bother pretending your opinion is at all relevant...

Poor phil. Showing his lack of comprehension AGAIN.

lee wrote on Nov 21^st, 2018 at 2:01pm:

BTW - I do support a Corruption Commission. They are just two different questions.

Question answered.

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

You have nothing to offer any debate apart from bullshit.

Sorry. I posted rebuttals to your posts. Did you bother to read past the headlines?

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

You are also very deceitful when you cut out the context of people's post and address irrelevancies whilst ignoring the main point in people's posts.

You mean like when you talk a crime weather (sic) punitive or not? The whole point of your post seemed to be about punitive actions. How can that be irrelevant?

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

Says a lot about you dickhead!!!

Says more about your grasp of the English language. Or lack thereof. Wink

Why bother trying to justify your bullshit mate.....If you do not oppose a Federal Corruption Commission what are you arguing about....You are a deceitful prick aren't you???

Huh

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19704
Gender: male

Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate
Reply #66 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:48pm

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:36pm:

If you do not oppose a Federal Corruption Commission what are you arguing about...

You were the one asked about arguments against a Federal Corruption Commission. I gave you a couple. Gee I am bending over backwards to help you.

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:36pm:

You are a deceitful prick aren't you???

Ooh, I am a deceitful prick because I answered your question? You have totally lost the plot. Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate
Reply #67 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 7:30pm

lee wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:26pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

No you are just a dickhead in denial....If you do not want to answer the question why bother pretending your opinion is at all relevant...

Poor phil. Showing his lack of comprehension AGAIN.

The question was general not aimed at you which you failed to answer anyway despite responding with bullshit....Lack of comprehension would by your problem dickhead!!!

lee wrote on Nov 21^st, 2018 at 2:01pm:

BTW - I do support a Corruption Commission. They are just two different questions.

Question answered.

No....The question was how do right wingers justify opposing a Federal Anti-Corruption Commission....If you do not oppose it then why did you respond dickhead???

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

You have nothing to offer any debate apart from bullshit.

Sorry. I posted rebuttals to your posts. Did you bother to read past the headlines?

You rebutted nothing....Apparently you agree which would make rebuttal impossible!!!

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

You are also very deceitful when you cut out the context of people's post and address irrelevancies whilst ignoring the main point in people's posts.

You mean like when you talk a crime weather (sic) punitive or not? The whole point of your post seemed to be about punitive actions. How can that be irrelevant?

Already answered and done with troll boy....Trying to dodge because you are a dickhead!!!

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 3:59pm:

Says a lot about you dickhead!!!

Says more about your grasp of the English language. Or lack thereof. Wink

Says a lot about your lack of integrity and nothing else....You are a deceitful prick!!!

If you agree with a Federal Anti-Corruption Commission WTF are you arguing about troll boy....You are a flake mate!!!

Roll Eyes

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate
Reply #68 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 7:34pm

lee wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:48pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:36pm:

If you do not oppose a Federal Corruption Commission what are you arguing about...

You were the one asked about arguments against a Federal Corruption Commission. I gave you a couple. Gee I am bending over backwards to help you.

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:36pm:

You are a deceitful prick aren't you???

Ooh, I am a deceitful prick because I answered your question? You have totally lost the plot. Grin

Were did you provide any argument about a Federal Corruption Commission....I will give you the benefit of doubt and accept you argued against it when you post the text too back it up....Over too you???

Huh

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19704
Gender: male

Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate
Reply #69 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 7:39pm

philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 7:34pm:

I will give you the benefit of doubt and accept you argued against it when you post the text too back it up

Where did I say I argued against a Commission? I wrote that I agreed.

That doesn't mean there can be no argument against one. I gave you an example.

lee wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 5:26pm:

lee wrote Yesterday at 12:01pm:
BTW - I do support a Corruption Commission. They are just two different questions.

You seem to think because I agree that I can't express an opinion on why someone may have a different one. That is really simplistic thinking.

Back to top

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 19704 Gender:	Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate Reply #70 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 7:41pm philperth2010 wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 7:30pm: If you agree with a Federal Anti-Corruption Commission WTF are you arguing about troll boy.. I am not arguing for or against. I offered an opinion on why someone might not agree.
Back to top	IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 19704 Gender:	Re: Federal corruption watchdog passes Senate Reply #71 - Nov 22^nd, 2018 at 7:46pm You could of course attempt to rebut my rebuttals from your links. That's the way debates generally work.
Back to top	IP Logged