philperth2010 wrote on Nov 21
st, 2018 at 2:10pm:
..If you support a Federal Corruption Commission then why are you agitating against one???
Where have I agitated against one?
You asked what argument. I gave you a couple.
The independent link. "corporate taxes were avoided on a massive scale" That of course suggests it also didn't occur under Labor. Not even a cursory look.

The Guardian - "New survey shows 85% believe most or all MPs corrupt, and two-thirds support the creation of a federal anti-corruption body"
So now perceptions are the same a fact.

The Conversation - "The 2015-16 Commonwealth budget’s “Stronger Communities” slush fund for every lower house MP raises serious questions. The allocation of $150,000 a year to every MP’s electorate risks seducing and trapping MPs into unethical behaviour that conflicts with new benchmarks for parliamentary codes of conduct."
You do understand every lower house MP includes Labor? If it is available to all - is it corruption? Or only corruption of the Coalition?

"Because Tony Abbott’s Coalition government has more MPs – they occupy 90 of the 150 seats in the House of Representatives – more of the money will go to government-held electorates. "
If Labor were in Government more sitting Labor sitting members would mean they would get more. Or do you think they would somehow repeal the legislation before an election?