Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 28
Send Topic Print
defending terrorists with misleading statistics (Read 36920 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 145946
Gender: male
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #75 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:36am
 
Karnal wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:23am:
Year 9 maths, innit.


Looks like Bobby didn't get that far.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #76 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:43am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:28am:
Bobby. wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:24am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:20am:
"In 2017, British intelligence MI5 said that Northern Ireland is the most concentrated area of terrorist activity "probably anywhere in Europe", with weekly threats from dissident Irish republicans".

Wink




Except to point out that Islamic terrorism is by far the biggest problem,
causing nearly all deaths and most casualties.


I'm not talking about casualties, Booby - I'm talking about the total number of attacks.

Jihadist = 16%

All others = 84%

84 is a much bigger number than 16, Booby.

https://openschoolbag.shopcadacdn.com/sites/files/openschoolbag/imagecache/bs201...


Greg why are you so keen to defend Islamic terrorism with misleading statistics?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 98947
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #77 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:47am
 
freediver wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:43am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:28am:
Bobby. wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:24am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 10:20am:
"In 2017, British intelligence MI5 said that Northern Ireland is the most concentrated area of terrorist activity "probably anywhere in Europe", with weekly threats from dissident Irish republicans".

Wink




Except to point out that Islamic terrorism is by far the biggest problem,
causing nearly all deaths and most casualties.


I'm not talking about casualties, Booby - I'm talking about the total number of attacks.

Jihadist = 16%

All others = 84%

84 is a much bigger number than 16, Booby.

https://openschoolbag.shopcadacdn.com/sites/files/openschoolbag/imagecache/bs201...


Greg why are you so keen to defend Islamic terrorism with misleading statistics?


You asked him that in the other thread, FD. Greggery asked you why you're so keen to defend the ethno-nationalists. You didn't answer.

Do you want to have a crack here?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #78 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:52am
 
Do you think Muslims are giving terrorists a bad name?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 98947
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #79 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 12:31pm
 
freediver wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 11:52am:
Do you think Muslims are giving terrorists a bad name?


Don't want to say, eh?

But a compelling question nevertheless. We apologists see terrorists giving Muslims a bad name.

You see Muslims giving your white supremacists a bad name by making them look weak.

With this in mind, FD, we don't need to ask. We know why you're so keen to defend ethno-nationalists and white supremacists.

Sometimes a question is just a question, innit.

Sometimes a question is an answer.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44684
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #80 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 1:49pm
 
freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:12pm:
Brian do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism?


Two points, FD.  The first is, you have not proved that the statistics Greg has quoted are "misleading".  The second is that you have not shown how Greg is using these statistics to "mislead".

Get back to us with your answer to those two questions and I might be interested in discussing this further.  Simply throwing mud is pointless however most of what you do is pointless, isn't it?  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44684
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #81 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 1:51pm
 
Karnal wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 11:05pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 9:48pm:
Soren, I believe belongs to that bunch of splitters, the Danes Downunder Front for the Liberation of Australia, Karnal.  That is when he isn't receiving his medication...   Roll Eyes


Well, I hope he's in their marvellous terrorist organisation.

You know, the pacifist one. Unlike the Muselman.


I reckon the Danes gave up being aggressive when they stop sending out those Viking ships.  You know the ones?  Full o' naked Berserkers...   Not that I think Soren should be allowed to strip off.   It'd scared the horses in the streets if he was let lose naked...   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 53070
Gender: male
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #82 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 3:26pm
 
I think the IRA and the American Public with Guns have till got a long way to go, if they think they can compete with the Moslems at TERRORISM.

And if the Moslems finally get their 'Messiah' (who dies for the sins of France-Euro) and lay down their weapons and Empire ways... where would it leave the IRA & American Public?

Don't you love that scene in Hunger Games where they storm the powers that be with a 'Suicide Bomber' - ahh, the Rebels. Not as good as you think, unlike the evil Imperialists run by Darth Vader. Wink
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 145946
Gender: male
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #83 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 4:27pm
 
Jasin wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 3:26pm:
I think the IRA and the American Public with Guns have till got a long way to go, if they think they can compete with the Moslems at TERRORISM.

And if the Moslems finally get their 'Messiah' (who dies for the sins of France-Euro) and lay down their weapons and Empire ways... where would it leave the IRA & American Public?

Don't you love that scene in Hunger Games where they storm the powers that be with a 'Suicide Bomber' - ahh, the Rebels. Not as good as you think, unlike the evil Imperialists run by Darth Vader. Wink


"In 2017, British intelligence MI5 said that Northern Ireland is the most concentrated area of terrorist activity "probably anywhere in Europe", with weekly threats from dissident Irish republicans".

Lol   Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #84 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 4:32pm
 
A fact of psychology is:

People endorse whichever position reinforces their connection to others with whom they share important commitments.


People who condemn islamic terrorism therefore certify the following as being the most pertinent facts.

EUROPOL TERRORISM

Terrorism

The overall terrorist threat to the security of the EU remains acute.

The main concern of Member States is jihadist terrorism and the closely related phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters who travel to and from conflict zones.

Recent attacks in the EU demonstrate the intent and capability of jihadist terrorists to inflict mass casualties on urban populations in an effort to induce a high state of well-publicised terror.

The carefully planned attacks continue to demonstrate the elevated threat to the EU from an extremist minority, operationally based in the Middle East, combined with a network of people born and raised in the EU, often radicalised within a short space of time, who have proven willing and able to act as facilitators and active accomplices in terrorism.

Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism. While there was a large number of terrorist attacks not connected with jihadism, the latter accounts for the most serious forms of terrorist activity as nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.


muslim terrorists are the main threat, muslim terrorists cause the most deaths and injuries, the muslim jihadist is the reason the threat level is acute in Europe.

Now jump to the other side the apologists and supporters of islamic terror, all endorse facts which reinforce their position they push a fact that other forms of terrorism outnumber islamic terrorism.

They are desperate to slither around the truth that islamic terrorism is the most deadly form, deliberately committed by muslims to inflict the most number of injuries and deaths of innocent men women and children (including babies in prams).

Just depends which side of the fence you're on as to which fact you are going to promote.

I'm absolutely certain I'm on the right side.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 98947
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #85 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 4:36pm
 
moses wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 4:32pm:
A fact of psychology is:

People endorse whichever position reinforces their connection to others with whom they share important commitments.


People who condemn islamic terrorism therefore certify the following as being the most pertinent facts.

EUROPOL TERRORISM

Terrorism

The overall terrorist threat to the security of the EU remains acute.

The main concern of Member States is jihadist terrorism and the closely related phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters who travel to and from conflict zones.

Recent attacks in the EU demonstrate the intent and capability of jihadist terrorists to inflict mass casualties on urban populations in an effort to induce a high state of well-publicised terror.

The carefully planned attacks continue to demonstrate the elevated threat to the EU from an extremist minority, operationally based in the Middle East, combined with a network of people born and raised in the EU, often radicalised within a short space of time, who have proven willing and able to act as facilitators and active accomplices in terrorism.

Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism. While there was a large number of terrorist attacks not connected with jihadism, the latter accounts for the most serious forms of terrorist activity as nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.


muslim terrorists are the main threat, muslim terrorists cause the most deaths and injuries, the muslim jihadist is the reason the threat level is acute in Europe.

Now jump to the other side the apologists and supporters of islamic terror, all endorse facts which reinforce their position they push a fact that other forms of terrorism outnumber islamic terrorism.

They are desperate to slither around the truth that islamic terrorism is the most deadly form, deliberately committed by muslims to inflict the most number of injuries and deaths of innocent men women and children (including babies in prams).

Just depends which side of the fence you're on as to which fact you are going to promote.

I'm absolutely certain I'm on the right side.


No no, now jump to the next page of the report, which contrasts FD's favourite form of terrorism with the Jihadists.

You left that part out, Moses.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52842
Gender: male
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #87 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 5:45pm
 
moses wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 4:53pm:

Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism. While there was a large number of terrorist attacks not connected with jihadism, the latter accounts for the most serious forms of terrorist activity as nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

The Manchester jihad attack is a terrorist attack and a pie in the face of some Eurocrat is also a 'terrorist' attack.

That's what Turd faps to.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #88 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 5:46pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 1:49pm:
freediver wrote on Dec 30th, 2018 at 10:12pm:
Brian do you have an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics do defend Islamic terrorism?


Two points, FD.  The first is, you have not proved that the statistics Greg has quoted are "misleading".  The second is that you have not shown how Greg is using these statistics to "mislead".

Get back to us with your answer to those two questions and I might be interested in discussing this further.  Simply throwing mud is pointless however most of what you do is pointless, isn't it?  Tsk, tsk.   Roll Eyes


So that is a no? You are afraid to have your own opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics to defend Islamic terrorism unless I give it to you?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 145946
Gender: male
Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #89 - Dec 31st, 2018 at 6:49pm
 
moses wrote on Dec 31st, 2018 at 4:32pm:
A fact of psychology is:

People endorse whichever position reinforces their connection to others with whom they share important commitments.


People who condemn islamic terrorism therefore certify the following as being the most pertinent facts.

EUROPOL TERRORISM

Terrorism

The overall terrorist threat to the security of the EU remains acute.

The main concern of Member States is jihadist terrorism and the closely related phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters who travel to and from conflict zones.

Recent attacks in the EU demonstrate the intent and capability of jihadist terrorists to inflict mass casualties on urban populations in an effort to induce a high state of well-publicised terror.

The carefully planned attacks continue to demonstrate the elevated threat to the EU from an extremist minority, operationally based in the Middle East, combined with a network of people born and raised in the EU, often radicalised within a short space of time, who have proven willing and able to act as facilitators and active accomplices in terrorism.

Of the 12 trends identified in the latest TE-SAT, most related to jihadist terrorism. While there was a large number of terrorist attacks not connected with jihadism, the latter accounts for the most serious forms of terrorist activity as nearly all reported fatalities and most of the casualties were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.


muslim terrorists are the main threat, muslim terrorists cause the most deaths and injuries, the muslim jihadist is the reason the threat level is acute in Europe.

Now jump to the other side the apologists and supporters of islamic terror, all endorse facts which reinforce their position they push a fact that other forms of terrorism outnumber islamic terrorism.

They are desperate to slither around the truth that islamic terrorism is the most deadly form, deliberately committed by muslims to inflict the most number of injuries and deaths of innocent men women and children (including babies in prams).

Just depends which side of the fence you're on as to which fact you are going to promote.

I'm absolutely certain I'm on the right side.


The side of non-Jihadist terrorists?

The Europol report shows that the vast majority of terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism, moses.

Why do you continually defend the 84% of terrorists who aren't Muslims?

I'm curious.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 28
Send Topic Print