Australian Politics Forum - defending terrorists with misleading statistics

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146373
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #255 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 4:06pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 3:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 3:48pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 3:44pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 3:35pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:11pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

look harder douche nozzle.

I looked harder.

Chief Inspector Ben Ryder, said: “We would like to reassure service personnel that police have no evidence that the victim has been targeted due to his service in the army, or that it is motivated by racism."

So, why is Mr Hammer pursuing the Muslim terrorist angle?

Tommy Robinson and other far-right figures have called the incident a “terrorist attack” and claimed the perpetrators were “Muslim”.

Ah.

Who's Tommy Robinson, you may ask.

A violent far-right extremist who has served time in prison for assaulting a police officer.

Ah Roll Eyes

Starting to make sense now.

Watch the video Tommy Robinson put out. Tommy interviewed the victims brother and friends who were at the scene and they say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because he was a soldier. Tommy said important witnesses haven't even been interviewed yet. True or not, it will come out. The days of covering things up are over.

Hmm, who should we believe:

- the police, or

- a violent, Islamophobic, far right-wing white-supremacist who's been in prison for assaulting a police officer?

Gonna have to think about that for a minute.

So? Nelson Mandela was a convicted murderer who blew kids and women to pieces.

Actually, he didn't. He instructed his subordinates to avoid civilian casualities as much as possible and to focus on attacking civilian infrastructure, such as power line towers and so on. They complied. Mandela was arrested on Terrorism charges but and note this, Hammer, no civilian casualties had occurred.

Quote:

Mandela was [initially] charged with inciting workers' strikes and leaving the country without permission

Quote:

The Rivonia Trial began at Pretoria Supreme Court in October, with Mandela and his comrades charged with four counts of sabotage and conspiracy to violently overthrow the government

[Source]

Tsk, tsk, tripped up by history, yet again, hey? Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Roll Eyes

Nelson Mandela was the head of UmKhonto we Sizwe, (MK), the terrorist wing of the ANC and South African Communist Party. At his trial, he had pleaded guilty to 156 acts of public violence including mobilising terrorist bombing campaigns, which planted bombs in public places, including the Johannesburg railway station. Many innocent people, including women and children, were killed by Nelson Mandela’s MK terrorists.

Grin

That's right, folks: this is where Mr Hammer, once again, tries to change the subject (despite the fact that I've said on numerous occasions in this forum that I was never a fan or Nelson or his wife).

Let's see what subject he'll come up with next.

Look at Pecca getting triggered because his hero murdered women and children. He's about to jizz all over his dungarees.

Changing the subject didn't work, so now he tries lies.

What's next - shall we take bets?

Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146373
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #256 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 4:09pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 4:06pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 3:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 3:48pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 3:44pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 3:35pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:11pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

look harder douche nozzle.

I looked harder.

Chief Inspector Ben Ryder, said: “We would like to reassure service personnel that police have no evidence that the victim has been targeted due to his service in the army, or that it is motivated by racism."

So, why is Mr Hammer pursuing the Muslim terrorist angle?

Tommy Robinson and other far-right figures have called the incident a “terrorist attack” and claimed the perpetrators were “Muslim”.

Ah.

Who's Tommy Robinson, you may ask.

A violent far-right extremist who has served time in prison for assaulting a police officer.

Ah Roll Eyes

Starting to make sense now.

Watch the video Tommy Robinson put out. Tommy interviewed the victims brother and friends who were at the scene and they say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because he was a soldier. Tommy said important witnesses haven't even been interviewed yet. True or not, it will come out. The days of covering things up are over.

Hmm, who should we believe:

- the police, or

- a violent, Islamophobic, far right-wing white-supremacist who's been in prison for assaulting a police officer?

Gonna have to think about that for a minute.

So? Nelson Mandela was a convicted murderer who blew kids and women to pieces.

Actually, he didn't. He instructed his subordinates to avoid civilian casualities as much as possible and to focus on attacking civilian infrastructure, such as power line towers and so on. They complied. Mandela was arrested on Terrorism charges but and note this, Hammer, no civilian casualties had occurred.

Quote:

Mandela was [initially] charged with inciting workers' strikes and leaving the country without permission

Quote:

The Rivonia Trial began at Pretoria Supreme Court in October, with Mandela and his comrades charged with four counts of sabotage and conspiracy to violently overthrow the government

[Source]

Tsk, tsk, tripped up by history, yet again, hey? Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Roll Eyes

Nelson Mandela was the head of UmKhonto we Sizwe, (MK), the terrorist wing of the ANC and South African Communist Party. At his trial, he had pleaded guilty to 156 acts of public violence including mobilising terrorist bombing campaigns, which planted bombs in public places, including the Johannesburg railway station. Many innocent people, including women and children, were killed by Nelson Mandela’s MK terrorists.

Grin

That's right, folks: this is where Mr Hammer, once again, tries to change the subject (despite the fact that I've said on numerous occasions in this forum that I was never a fan or Nelson or his wife).

Let's see what subject he'll come up with next.

Look at Pecca getting triggered because his hero murdered women and children. He's about to jizz all over his dungarees.

Changing the subject didn't work, so now he tries lies.

What's next - shall we take bets?

Grin

My money's on personal insults.

Let's see ... Undecided

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44750

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #257 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 4:17pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 3:44pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 3:35pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:11pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

look harder douche nozzle.

I looked harder.

Chief Inspector Ben Ryder, said: “We would like to reassure service personnel that police have no evidence that the victim has been targeted due to his service in the army, or that it is motivated by racism."

So, why is Mr Hammer pursuing the Muslim terrorist angle?

Tommy Robinson and other far-right figures have called the incident a “terrorist attack” and claimed the perpetrators were “Muslim”.

Ah.

Who's Tommy Robinson, you may ask.

A violent far-right extremist who has served time in prison for assaulting a police officer.

Ah Roll Eyes

Starting to make sense now.

Watch the video Tommy Robinson put out. Tommy interviewed the victims brother and friends who were at the scene and they say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because he was a soldier. Tommy said important witnesses haven't even been interviewed yet. True or not, it will come out. The days of covering things up are over.

Hmm, who should we believe:

- the police, or

- a violent, Islamophobic, far right-wing white-supremacist who's been in prison for assaulting a police officer?

Gonna have to think about that for a minute.

So? Nelson Mandela was a convicted murderer who blew kids and women to pieces.

Actually, he didn't. He instructed his subordinates to avoid civilian casualities as much as possible and to focus on attacking civilian infrastructure, such as power line towers and so on. They complied. Mandela was arrested on Terrorism charges but and note this, Hammer, no civilian casualties had occurred.

Quote:

Mandela was [initially] charged with inciting workers' strikes and leaving the country without permission

Quote:

The Rivonia Trial began at Pretoria Supreme Court in October, with Mandela and his comrades charged with four counts of sabotage and conspiracy to violently overthrow the government

[Source]

Tsk, tsk, tripped up by history, yet again, hey? Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Roll Eyes

Nelson Mandela was the head of UmKhonto we Sizwe, (MK), the terrorist wing of the ANC and South African Communist Party. At his trial, he had pleaded guilty to 156 acts of public violence including mobilising terrorist bombing campaigns, which planted bombs in public places, including the Johannesburg railway station. Many innocent people, including women and children, were killed by Nelson Mandela’s MK terrorists.

Grin

Except, Hammer, the Johannesburg railway station bombing occurred after Mandela had been arrested in 1962 and placed on trial. Bit hard to be held responsible for an act of Terrorism which occurred after the police had arrested you. Did they give him day release to plant the bomb, Hammer, Mmmm? Roll Eyes

Most Terrorist acts of MK occurred after Mandela had been arrested, charged and imprisoned on Robben Island - a remote prison off of Cape Town where his communications were limited. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

moses

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6353

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #258 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 4:56pm

karnal wrote Reply #220 - Today at 10:25am
Quote:

Thanks, Moses. How did you arrive at the 54.271 figure?

I reiterate:

TERRORIST THREAT IN E.U. REMAINS HIGH

MAIN TRENDS

These attacks killed 68 victims and left 844 injured. Nearly all casualties (62) were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

68 people were killed in Europe by terrorists if the apologists figures are right this means that:

84% of attacks killed 6 people, which equates to 0.0714 deaths per attack.

16% of the attacks killed 62 people which equates to 3.875 deaths per attack.

O.K so muslims kill 3.875 people per attack, non muslims kill 0.0714 per attack.

Which means that muslims are 54.271 times more likely to kill innocent people than anybody else.

muslims kill 54.271 times more people with the least amount of attacks, as their modus operandi is maximum lethal force aimed at the soft target, (innocent men women and children of the general public).

islamic terrorism is still the highest threat.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 53050
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #259 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 8:16pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 4:17pm:

Except, Hammer, the Johannesburg railway station bombing occurred after Mandela had been arrested in 1962 and placed on trial. Bit hard to be held responsible for an act of Terrorism which occurred after the police had arrested you. Did they give him day release to plant the bomb, Hammer, Mmmm? Roll Eyes

Most Terrorist acts of MK occurred after Mandela had been arrested, charged and imprisoned on Robben Island - a remote prison off of Cape Town where his communications were limited. Roll Eyes

Was he a 'lone wolf' like the hordes of Islamic jihadist operating across the world?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44750

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #260 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 8:34pm

Frank wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 8:16pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 4:17pm:

Except, Hammer, the Johannesburg railway station bombing occurred after Mandela had been arrested in 1962 and placed on trial. Bit hard to be held responsible for an act of Terrorism which occurred after the police had arrested you. Did they give him day release to plant the bomb, Hammer, Mmmm? Roll Eyes

Most Terrorist acts of MK occurred after Mandela had been arrested, charged and imprisoned on Robben Island - a remote prison off of Cape Town where his communications were limited. Roll Eyes

Was he a 'lone wolf' like the hordes of Islamic jihadist operating across the world?

Some Terrorists are, most aren't, Soren. Nelson Mandela was initially the leader of the MK, after his arrest and imprisonment, he was a lonely prisoner in a maximum security prison, cut off from his supporters and subordinates. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 53050
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #261 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 8:52pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 8:34pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 8:16pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 4:17pm:

Except, Hammer, the Johannesburg railway station bombing occurred after Mandela had been arrested in 1962 and placed on trial. Bit hard to be held responsible for an act of Terrorism which occurred after the police had arrested you. Did they give him day release to plant the bomb, Hammer, Mmmm? Roll Eyes

Most Terrorist acts of MK occurred after Mandela had been arrested, charged and imprisoned on Robben Island - a remote prison off of Cape Town where his communications were limited. Roll Eyes

Was he a 'lone wolf' like the hordes of Islamic jihadist operating across the world?

Some Terrorists are, most aren't, Soren. Nelson Mandela was initially the leader of the MK, after his arrest and imprisonment, he was a lonely prisoner in a maximum security prison, cut off from his supporters and subordinates. Roll Eyes

Not a lone wolf then but a terrorist insurgent.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51365
At my desk.

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #262 - Jan 5^th, 2019 at 8:19am

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 10:08pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 8:14pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 7:52pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 7:18pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 4:23pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:40pm:

Here we have a thread choc full of Brian and Greg using misleading statistics

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Tsk, tsk, telling lies again, FD? Really? How unbecoming of you. How about you answer the questions I have asked in that thread and which you have continually run away from? Anybody would think you're a coward, the way you're refusing to answer my questions and creating new threads all over the place. As the great Bard said, "Cowards die many times before their deaths." Keep running, FD, it won't save you... Roll Eyes

What's the question, dickheaddle?

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Poor, poor, Soren. Resorting to ad hominem insults again? Tsk, tsk. I provided a link here did you miss it? Really? Roll Eyes

Where's the question, dickheaddle?
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?action=post;num=1539592672;virboard=;quot...

Nobody said - other than you dicks - that the Europol report misrepresented anything.

Really? I think it was FD who ran the line that Greg was "misleading" people with invalid statistics first, Soren. Perhaps you need to reread the thread?

It's in the thread title Brian. Surely you could have read that far before posting?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98973

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #263 - Jan 5^th, 2019 at 11:00am

Excuse me, FD, you didn't answer this one:

Karnal wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 6:20pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 1:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:29pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:04pm:

Sure Brian. This thread is evidence.

Do you feel any shame at all in defending Muslim terrorists?

See, I was correct, you have slunk away and asked more questions. Provide evidence. Where have I "defended" Muslim Terrorists? Or are you just interested still in throwing mud in the hope some will stick... Tsk, tsk. Little boy's strategies, hey, FD? Run along, back to your little kiddies' playground where all your little friends play such games. When you're serious and answer my questions, I may answer yours. Roll Eyes

I have provided evidence. I started this thread for you and Greg to post your snivelling defense of Muslim terrorists in, and you obliged. And now I present it back to you.

So here you are, Greg and Brian defending Muslim terrorists.

Yes, FD, but why have you tried to hide your support for white supremacist terrorism?

Why aren't you expressing your pride that members of the white race are finally standing up for your people and attempting to compete with the jihadists on the body-count?

Why don't you show your gratitude for your white brothers who lay their lives on the line so that you can live in a society without having to cross paths or interbreed with any inferior races?

And why do you continue to refuse to salute those who are prepared to exterminate your race-enemies while you cower in a corner out of fear of being called a racist?

Remember, sometimes a question is just a question.

What's your answer?

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98973

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #264 - Jan 5^th, 2019 at 11:03am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:56pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:51pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:47pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Why don't you believe the police?

It's still being investigated. The inside knowledge from eyewitness accounts is that it was a terrorist attack. We'll see what happens.

Yet the police - an independent third party - say otherwise.

Sounds to me like more of your racist/Islamophobic paranoid nonsense, Mr Hammer.

Yes, but were they at least tinted?

You tell me that.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98973

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #265 - Jan 5^th, 2019 at 11:06am

moses wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 4:56pm:

karnal wrote Reply #220 - Today at 10:25am
Quote:

Thanks, Moses. How did you arrive at the 54.271 figure?

I reiterate:

TERRORIST THREAT IN E.U. REMAINS HIGH

MAIN TRENDS

These attacks killed 68 victims and left 844 injured. Nearly all casualties (62) were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

68 people were killed in Europe by terrorists if the apologists figures are right this means that:

84% of attacks killed 6 people, which equates to 0.0714 deaths per attack.

16% of the attacks killed 62 people which equates to 3.875 deaths per attack.

O.K so muslims kill 3.875 people per attack, non muslims kill 0.0714 per attack.

Which means that muslims are 54.271 times more likely to kill innocent people than anybody else.

muslims kill 54.271 times more people with the least amount of attacks, as their modus operandi is maximum lethal force aimed at the soft target, (innocent men women and children of the general public).

islamic terrorism is still the highest threat.

You're right. Good point. Year 9 maths.

Can you do one on Darkie?

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44750

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #266 - Jan 5^th, 2019 at 1:41pm

freediver wrote on Jan 5^th, 2019 at 8:19am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 10:08pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 8:14pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 7:52pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 7:18pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 4:23pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:40pm:

Here we have a thread choc full of Brian and Greg using misleading statistics

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Tsk, tsk, telling lies again, FD? Really? How unbecoming of you. How about you answer the questions I have asked in that thread and which you have continually run away from? Anybody would think you're a coward, the way you're refusing to answer my questions and creating new threads all over the place. As the great Bard said, "Cowards die many times before their deaths." Keep running, FD, it won't save you... Roll Eyes

What's the question, dickheaddle?

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Poor, poor, Soren. Resorting to ad hominem insults again? Tsk, tsk. I provided a link here did you miss it? Really? Roll Eyes

Where's the question, dickheaddle?
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?action=post;num=1539592672;virboard=;quot...

Nobody said - other than you dicks - that the Europol report misrepresented anything.

Really? I think it was FD who ran the line that Greg was "misleading" people with invalid statistics first, Soren. Perhaps you need to reread the thread?

It's in the thread title Brian. Surely you could have read that far before posting?

When you answer my questions, FD, I might answer yours. Run along back to your little kiddies' playground where you normally hide, OK? I think your friends are calling you home. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 51365 At my desk.	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #267 - Jan 5^th, 2019 at 2:21pm Too much too ask?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 113169
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #268 - Jan 5^th, 2019 at 2:30pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 5^th, 2019 at 1:41pm:

When you answer my questions, FD, I might answer yours. Run along back to your little kiddies' playground where you normally hide, OK? I think your friends are calling you home. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Brian,
you're a very rude an arrogant poster.

You claim to have a plethora of university degrees
and to be an expert on just about every topic -
then assert that other posters should
" run along back to your little kiddies' playground "
as though they have nothing of any worth to contribute -
and that you're so superior to them.

Don't bother posting if that's all you've got.
Someone with a university education should be able to write cogent powerful arguments -
and I've yet to ever see you do that.

I'm calling you fake -
someone who got his degrees out of numerous corn flake packets.

Back to top

IP Logged

moses Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6353	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #269 - Jan 5^th, 2019 at 3:58pm @ karnal Quote: Can you do one on Darkie? What's with the, obsession with colour?
Back to top	IP Logged