Australian Politics Forum - defending terrorists with misleading statistics

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 51358 At my desk.	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #225 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 12:51pm Wunaway Brian.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #226 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 44746	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #227 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:34pm freediver wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 12:51pm: Wunaway Brian. When you answer my questions, I might answer yours, FD. Until you do, you will not get an answer to me. The only person running is yourself. Keep it up, it is amusing to watch. Tsk, tsk. Such a shining light amongst our community, hey?
Back to top	It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44746

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #228 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146335
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #229 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:47pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Why don't you believe the police?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #230 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:51pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:47pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Why don't you believe the police?

It's still being investigated. The inside knowledge from eyewitness accounts is that it was a terrorist attack. We'll see what happens.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #231 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:54pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

look harder douche nozzle.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146335
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #232 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:56pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:51pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:47pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Why don't you believe the police?

It's still being investigated. The inside knowledge from eyewitness accounts is that it was a terrorist attack. We'll see what happens.

Yet the police - an independent third party - say otherwise.

Sounds to me like more of your racist/Islamophobic paranoid nonsense, Mr Hammer.

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44746

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #233 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:01pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

look harder douche nozzle.

No need to get insulting, Hammer. It just shows how childish you are. Tsk, tsk. Sounds like bullshit to me. I won't bother looking 'cause I cannot find anything... Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #234 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:02pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:01pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

look harder douche nozzle.

No need to get insulting, Hammer. It just shows how childish you are. Tsk, tsk. Sounds like bullshit to me. I won't bother looking 'cause I cannot find anything... Roll Eyes

you won't look because you are a do-gooder.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146335
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #235 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:03pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

look harder douche nozzle.

I looked harder.

Chief Inspector Ben Ryder, said: “We would like to reassure service personnel that police have no evidence that the victim has been targeted due to his service in the army, or that it is motivated by racism."

So, why is Mr Hammer pursuing the Muslim terrorist angle?

Tommy Robinson and other far-right figures have called the incident a “terrorist attack” and claimed the perpetrators were “Muslim”.

Ah.

Who's Tommy Robinson, you may ask.

A violent far-right extremist who has served time in prison for assaulting a police officer.

Ah Roll Eyes

Starting to make sense now.

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44746

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #236 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:08pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:02pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:01pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

look harder douche nozzle.

No need to get insulting, Hammer. It just shows how childish you are. Tsk, tsk. Sounds like bullshit to me. I won't bother looking 'cause I cannot find anything... Roll Eyes

you won't look because you are a do-gooder.

Actually, I have found a report - because I didn't stop looking, Hammer. Appears to me, that your claims are based on Islamophobic claims. Rather typical of you and them, Hammer. The Police have found no evidence, thus far of Terrorism. No one appears to have claimed the event. Sounds to me like a common hit and run accident, nothing more. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #237 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:11pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

look harder douche nozzle.

I looked harder.

Chief Inspector Ben Ryder, said: “We would like to reassure service personnel that police have no evidence that the victim has been targeted due to his service in the army, or that it is motivated by racism."

So, why is Mr Hammer pursuing the Muslim terrorist angle?

Tommy Robinson and other far-right figures have called the incident a “terrorist attack” and claimed the perpetrators were “Muslim”.

Ah.

Who's Tommy Robinson, you may ask.

A violent far-right extremist who has served time in prison for assaulting a police officer.

Ah Roll Eyes

Starting to make sense now.

Watch the video Tommy Robinson put out. Tommy interviewed the victims brother and friends who were at the scene and they say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because he was a soldier. Tommy said important witnesses haven't even been interviewed yet. True or not, it will come out. The days of covering things up are over.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146335
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #238 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:15pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:11pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

look harder douche nozzle.

I looked harder.

Chief Inspector Ben Ryder, said: “We would like to reassure service personnel that police have no evidence that the victim has been targeted due to his service in the army, or that it is motivated by racism."

So, why is Mr Hammer pursuing the Muslim terrorist angle?

Tommy Robinson and other far-right figures have called the incident a “terrorist attack” and claimed the perpetrators were “Muslim”.

Ah.

Who's Tommy Robinson, you may ask.

A violent far-right extremist who has served time in prison for assaulting a police officer.

Ah Roll Eyes

Starting to make sense now.

Watch the video Tommy Robinson put out. Tommy interviewed the victims brother and friends who were at the scene and they say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because he was a soldier. Tommy said important witnesses haven't even been interviewed yet. True or not, it will come out. The days of covering things up are over.

Hmm, who should we believe:

- the police, or

- a violent, Islamophobic, far right-wing white-supremacist who's been in prison for assaulting a police officer?

Gonna have to think about that for a minute.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #239 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:18pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:15pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:11pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 2:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:54pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:37pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 1:18pm:

There's one doing the rounds in the UK at the moment. A serving British soldier was intentionally runover by a car upon exiting a nightclub in the UK. Friends of the victim say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because of his service. The police and media say otherwise. If he was targeted then that's terrorism. Let's see where this goes. The media have no chance of sweeping this one under the rug.

Nothing shows up on a websearch about such an event, Hammer. Do you have a link to the story or is this just your usual, Islamophobic bullshit? Tsk, tsk, you really need a life, you realise? You need to get out from your mother's basement. It's not healthy down there. Roll Eyes

look harder douche nozzle.

I looked harder.

Chief Inspector Ben Ryder, said: “We would like to reassure service personnel that police have no evidence that the victim has been targeted due to his service in the army, or that it is motivated by racism."

So, why is Mr Hammer pursuing the Muslim terrorist angle?

Tommy Robinson and other far-right figures have called the incident a “terrorist attack” and claimed the perpetrators were “Muslim”.

Ah.

Who's Tommy Robinson, you may ask.

A violent far-right extremist who has served time in prison for assaulting a police officer.

Ah Roll Eyes

Starting to make sense now.

Watch the video Tommy Robinson put out. Tommy interviewed the victims brother and friends who were at the scene and they say he was targeted by a group of Muslim men because he was a soldier. Tommy said important witnesses haven't even been interviewed yet. True or not, it will come out. The days of covering things up are over.

Hmm, who should we believe:

- the police, or

- a violent, Islamophobic, far right-wing white-supremacist who's been in prison for assaulting a police officer?

Gonna have to think about that for a minute.

or the victims brother who was at the scene.

Back to top

IP Logged