Australian Politics Forum - defending terrorists with misleading statistics

The Reboot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 628
None of your damn business
Gender: female

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #210 - Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 1:09pm

issuevoter wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 10:14am:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 9:42am:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:41pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:28pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:15pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 7:29pm:

13 pages in and Brian and Greg are still riding the Islamic terrorist bandwagon.

Shameless.

I am merely replying to the foolish comments directed to me, Freediver. If anybody is "riding the Terrorist bandwagon," it is you and your fellow Islamophobes. Without Muslims to hate, what would you do? You'd be lost. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

You are on the Islamic terrorist bandwagon Brian. This is classic spineless apologetics.

You have lost the ability to form an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics to defend terrorists. You post in this thread compulsively, but are afraid of your own opinion on the thread topic. You are not "merely replying". You are afraid to reply.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Need I remind you? When you answer my questions, I may answer yours, FD. Until then, you're just whistling dixie, OK? Now, run along back to the little kiddies' playground where all your Islamophobe friends are. Roll Eyes

Until then, you and Greg will ride that Islamic terrorist bandwagon. Page after page after page. And blame me for your fear of your own opinion.

Do you feel any shame at all in defending Muslim terrorists?

Of course not. He's a Doctor of Divinity, and holds the moral high ground.

And he's so much more intelligent than the rest of this forum, dearie. Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #211 - Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 1:51pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:29pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:04pm:

Sure Brian. This thread is evidence.

Do you feel any shame at all in defending Muslim terrorists?

See, I was correct, you have slunk away and asked more questions. Provide evidence. Where have I "defended" Muslim Terrorists? Or are you just interested still in throwing mud in the hope some will stick... Tsk, tsk. Little boy's strategies, hey, FD? Run along, back to your little kiddies' playground where all your little friends play such games. When you're serious and answer my questions, I may answer yours. Roll Eyes

I have provided evidence. I started this thread for you and Greg to post your snivelling defense of Muslim terrorists in, and you obliged. And now I present it back to you.

So here you are, Greg and Brian defending Muslim terrorists.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 112929
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #212 - Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 3:41pm

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 1:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:29pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:04pm:

Sure Brian. This thread is evidence.

Do you feel any shame at all in defending Muslim terrorists?

See, I was correct, you have slunk away and asked more questions. Provide evidence. Where have I "defended" Muslim Terrorists? Or are you just interested still in throwing mud in the hope some will stick... Tsk, tsk. Little boy's strategies, hey, FD? Run along, back to your little kiddies' playground where all your little friends play such games. When you're serious and answer my questions, I may answer yours. Roll Eyes

I have provided evidence. I started this thread for you and Greg to post your snivelling defense of Muslim terrorists in, and you obliged. And now I present it back to you.

So here you are, Greg and Brian defending Muslim terrorists.

Forgive them for they know not what they are doing.

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44684

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #213 - Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 4:04pm

Bobby. wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 3:41pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 1:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:29pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:04pm:

Sure Brian. This thread is evidence.

Do you feel any shame at all in defending Muslim terrorists?

See, I was correct, you have slunk away and asked more questions. Provide evidence. Where have I "defended" Muslim Terrorists? Or are you just interested still in throwing mud in the hope some will stick... Tsk, tsk. Little boy's strategies, hey, FD? Run along, back to your little kiddies' playground where all your little friends play such games. When you're serious and answer my questions, I may answer yours. Roll Eyes

I have provided evidence. I started this thread for you and Greg to post your snivelling defense of Muslim terrorists in, and you obliged. And now I present it back to you.

So here you are, Greg and Brian defending Muslim terrorists.

Forgive them for they know not what they are doing.

FD needs your forgiveness, Bobby, not me. He is the Islamophobe who is throwing mud. When he grows up and actually makes an effort to support his case, I might answer his questions. Until then, we have this standoff. It goes no where. He is being childish and it shows.

So, FD, when are you going to answer my questions, Mmmm? Tsk, tsk, your mud throwing just slides off my shields. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 19702
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #214 - Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 4:50pm

rhino wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 10:47pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 9:27pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 9:21pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 12:04pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 11:40am:

Frank wrote on Jan 1^st, 2019 at 10:48am:

Although the total number of jihadist terrorist attacks decreased from 17 in 2015 to 13 attacks in 2016, of which 6 were linked to the so-called Islamic State (IS), 135 of the 142 victims of terrorist attacks in 2016 were killed in the 13 jihadist attacks.

https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-...

135 of the 142 dead were killed by jihadists and you cockwombles keep insisting that you are not deliberately misrepresenting the report by parrotting an irrelevant statistics merely to deflect attention from the scale of these murders for Allah.

I am unsure who you're talking to, Soren? I have made no such claims. I have merely defended Greg from what appears, on the surface, to be unwarranted attacks against the EuroPol statistics. Until you address the reality that more non-Jihadist attacks occurred than Jihadist attacks, you're just whistling dixie, Soren. A not unusual situation for you, as we all know but still the truth of what you're doing... Roll Eyes

As the report shows, jihad is by far the most deadly terrorist threat, dwarfing all others put together by an immense margin. That's not islamophobia or whistling dixie, cockwomble, thats reality - the thing you have been unmoored from for far too long.

135 of the 142 killed in terrorist attacks were a result of Islamic terrorists, muslims are about 5% of the population in Europe, the other 7 killed were a result of non muslims who make up the other 95% of the population in Europe.

Quote:

Muslims make up 4.9% of Europe’s population in 2016

http://www.pewforum.org/2017/11/29/europes-growing-muslim-population/

In Pakistan which is 99% muslim how many die from terrorism in the land of the pure?
Quote:

Terrorism in Pakistan

Terrorism in Pakistan has become a major and highly destructive phenomenon in recent years. The annual death toll from terrorist attacks has risen from 164 in 2003 to 3318 in 2009,[1][2][3] with a total of 35,000 Pakistanis killed between 11 September 2001 and May 2011.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_Pakistan

It woulld be interesting to add up Islamic terrorist deaths from all the countries where Islam dominates the demographics, oh dearie dearie me it doesn't look good tsk tsk tsk Roll Eyes

At 5% of the population muslims have racked up 135 of the 142 dead bodies from terrorism.

Yes. Thats the only statistic in this conversation we should be concerned about. Why do you think Pecca and Brian consistently apologise for Islamic extremists?

I have no idea why Little pecca and Brian consistently apologise for Islamic extremists, perhaps it's moral bankruptcy or mental retardation

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #215 - Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 4:55pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 4:04pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 3:41pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 1:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:29pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:04pm:

Sure Brian. This thread is evidence.

Do you feel any shame at all in defending Muslim terrorists?

See, I was correct, you have slunk away and asked more questions. Provide evidence. Where have I "defended" Muslim Terrorists? Or are you just interested still in throwing mud in the hope some will stick... Tsk, tsk. Little boy's strategies, hey, FD? Run along, back to your little kiddies' playground where all your little friends play such games. When you're serious and answer my questions, I may answer yours. Roll Eyes

I have provided evidence. I started this thread for you and Greg to post your snivelling defense of Muslim terrorists in, and you obliged. And now I present it back to you.

So here you are, Greg and Brian defending Muslim terrorists.

Forgive them for they know not what they are doing.

FD needs your forgiveness, Bobby, not me. He is the Islamophobe who is throwing mud. When he grows up and actually makes an effort to support his case, I might answer his questions. Until then, we have this standoff. It goes no where. He is being childish and it shows.

So, FD, when are you going to answer my questions, Mmmm? Tsk, tsk, your mud throwing just slides off my shields. Roll Eyes

It was a question Brian. I asked you your opinion. You ran away. I am not going to bother proving something if no-one disagrees with it.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 52868 Gender:	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #216 - Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 5:24pm Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 4:04pm: So, FD, when are you going to answer my questions, Mmmm? Tsk, tsk, your mud throwing just slides off my shields. What question? Whether 84 for is a bigger number than 16? ( You have shields??? )
Back to top	« Last Edit: Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 5:30pm by Frank » Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98973

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #217 - Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 6:02pm

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 4:55pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 4:04pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 3:41pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 1:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:29pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:04pm:

Sure Brian. This thread is evidence.

Do you feel any shame at all in defending Muslim terrorists?

See, I was correct, you have slunk away and asked more questions. Provide evidence. Where have I "defended" Muslim Terrorists? Or are you just interested still in throwing mud in the hope some will stick... Tsk, tsk. Little boy's strategies, hey, FD? Run along, back to your little kiddies' playground where all your little friends play such games. When you're serious and answer my questions, I may answer yours. Roll Eyes

I have provided evidence. I started this thread for you and Greg to post your snivelling defense of Muslim terrorists in, and you obliged. And now I present it back to you.

So here you are, Greg and Brian defending Muslim terrorists.

Forgive them for they know not what they are doing.

FD needs your forgiveness, Bobby, not me. He is the Islamophobe who is throwing mud. When he grows up and actually makes an effort to support his case, I might answer his questions. Until then, we have this standoff. It goes no where. He is being childish and it shows.

So, FD, when are you going to answer my questions, Mmmm? Tsk, tsk, your mud throwing just slides off my shields. Roll Eyes

It was a question Brian. I asked you your opinion. You ran away. I am not going to bother proving something if no-one disagrees with it.

Did anyone ask for your opinion, FD?

What was your answer?

Back to top

IP Logged

moses

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6353

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #218 - Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 6:14pm

FROM EUROPOL

TERRORIST THREAT IN E.U. REMAINS HIGH

MAIN TRENDS

These attacks killed 68 victims and left 844 injured. Nearly all casualties (62) were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

68 people were killed in Europe by terrorists if the apologists figures are right this means that:

84% of attacks killed 6 people, which equates to 0.0714 deaths per attack.

16% of the attacks killed 62 people which equates to 3.875 deaths per attack.

O.K so muslims kill 3.875 people per attack, non muslims kill 0.0714 per attack.

Which means that muslims are 54.271 times more likely to kill innocent people than anybody else.

So the facts are that non muslims carry out the most attacks delivering the least amount of fatalities.

muslims kill 54.271 times more people with the least amount of attacks, as their terrorism is maximum lethal force aimed at the soft target, (innocent men women and children of the general public).

islamic terrorism is still the highest threat.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98973

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #219 - Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 6:20pm

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 1:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:29pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:04pm:

Sure Brian. This thread is evidence.

Do you feel any shame at all in defending Muslim terrorists?

See, I was correct, you have slunk away and asked more questions. Provide evidence. Where have I "defended" Muslim Terrorists? Or are you just interested still in throwing mud in the hope some will stick... Tsk, tsk. Little boy's strategies, hey, FD? Run along, back to your little kiddies' playground where all your little friends play such games. When you're serious and answer my questions, I may answer yours. Roll Eyes

I have provided evidence. I started this thread for you and Greg to post your snivelling defense of Muslim terrorists in, and you obliged. And now I present it back to you.

So here you are, Greg and Brian defending Muslim terrorists.

Yes, FD, but why have you tried to hide your support for white supremacist terrorism?

Why aren't you expressing your pride that members of the white race are finally standing up for your people and attempting to compete with the jihadists on the body-count?

Why don't you show your gratitude for your white brothers who lay their lives on the line so that you can live in a society without having to cross paths or interbreed with any inferior races?

And why do you continue to refuse to salute those who are prepared to exterminate your race-enemies while you cower in a corner out of fear of being called a racist?

Remember, sometimes a question is just a question.

What's your answer?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jan 4^th, 2019 at 10:19am by Karnal »

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98973

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #220 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 10:25am

moses wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 6:14pm:

FROM EUROPOL

TERRORIST THREAT IN E.U. REMAINS HIGH

MAIN TRENDS

These attacks killed 68 victims and left 844 injured. Nearly all casualties (62) were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

68 people were killed in Europe by terrorists if the apologists figures are right this means that:

84% of attacks killed 6 people, which equates to 0.0714 deaths per attack.

16% of the attacks killed 62 people which equates to 3.875 deaths per attack.

O.K so muslims kill 3.875 people per attack, non muslims kill 0.0714 per attack.

Which means that muslims are 54.271 times more likely to kill innocent people than anybody else.

So the facts are that non muslims carry out the most attacks delivering the least amount of fatalities.

muslims kill 54.271 times more people with the least amount of attacks, as their terrorism is maximum lethal force aimed at the soft target, (innocent men women and children of the general public).

islamic terrorism is still the highest threat.

Thanks, Moses. How did you arrive at the 54.271 figure?

Any chance you could provide the number for the tinted races?

We know they're about 400% more likely to outbreed us, but how likely are they to kill?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 146024
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #221 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 10:27am

moses wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 6:14pm:

FROM EUROPOL

TERRORIST THREAT IN E.U. REMAINS HIGH

MAIN TRENDS

These attacks killed 68 victims and left 844 injured. Nearly all casualties (62) were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

68 people were killed in Europe by terrorists if the apologists figures are right this means that:

84% of attacks killed 6 people, which equates to 0.0714 deaths per attack.

16% of the attacks killed 62 people which equates to 3.875 deaths per attack.

O.K so muslims kill 3.875 people per attack, non muslims kill 0.0714 per attack.

Which means that muslims are 54.271 times more likely to kill innocent people than anybody else.

So the facts are that non muslims carry out the most attacks delivering the least amount of fatalities.

muslims kill 54.271 times more people with the least amount of attacks, as their terrorism is maximum lethal force aimed at the soft target, (innocent men women and children of the general public).

islamic terrorism is still the highest threat.

Correct.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 52868
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #222 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 10:30am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 4^th, 2019 at 10:27am:

moses wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 6:14pm:

FROM EUROPOL

TERRORIST THREAT IN E.U. REMAINS HIGH

MAIN TRENDS

These attacks killed 68 victims and left 844 injured. Nearly all casualties (62) were the result of jihadist terrorist attacks.

68 people were killed in Europe by terrorists if the apologists figures are right this means that:

84% of attacks killed 6 people, which equates to 0.0714 deaths per attack.

16% of the attacks killed 62 people which equates to 3.875 deaths per attack.

O.K so muslims kill 3.875 people per attack, non muslims kill 0.0714 per attack.

Which means that muslims are 54.271 times more likely to kill innocent people than anybody else.

So the facts are that non muslims carry out the most attacks delivering the least amount of fatalities.

muslims kill 54.271 times more people with the least amount of attacks, as their terrorism is maximum lethal force aimed at the soft target, (innocent men women and children of the general public).

islamic terrorism is still the highest threat.

Correct.

Significance, sh!ttypetty?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44684

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #223 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 12:37pm

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 4:55pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 4:04pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 3:41pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 1:51pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:29pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 12:04pm:

Sure Brian. This thread is evidence.

Do you feel any shame at all in defending Muslim terrorists?

See, I was correct, you have slunk away and asked more questions. Provide evidence. Where have I "defended" Muslim Terrorists? Or are you just interested still in throwing mud in the hope some will stick... Tsk, tsk. Little boy's strategies, hey, FD? Run along, back to your little kiddies' playground where all your little friends play such games. When you're serious and answer my questions, I may answer yours. Roll Eyes

I have provided evidence. I started this thread for you and Greg to post your snivelling defense of Muslim terrorists in, and you obliged. And now I present it back to you.

So here you are, Greg and Brian defending Muslim terrorists.

Forgive them for they know not what they are doing.

FD needs your forgiveness, Bobby, not me. He is the Islamophobe who is throwing mud. When he grows up and actually makes an effort to support his case, I might answer his questions. Until then, we have this standoff. It goes no where. He is being childish and it shows.

So, FD, when are you going to answer my questions, Mmmm? Tsk, tsk, your mud throwing just slides off my shields. Roll Eyes

It was a question Brian. I asked you your opinion. You ran away. I am not going to bother proving something if no-one disagrees with it.

So, FD, when are you going to answer my questions, Mmmm? Tsk, tsk, your mud throwing just slides off my shields. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44684

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #224 - Jan 4^th, 2019 at 12:50pm

Frank wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 5:24pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2019 at 4:04pm:

So, FD, when are you going to answer my questions, Mmmm? Tsk, tsk, your mud throwing just slides off my shields. Roll Eyes

What question? Whether 84 for is a bigger number than 16?

I refer you to the two questions I asked here, Soren. Neither is hard. FD refuses to answer them for some (not) obscure reason. Roll Eyes

Quote:

( You have shields??? Cheesy

)

Yes, I have shields. They are presently set to a low level (because they aren't faced by anything difficult, just the usual Islamophobic bullshit). Roll Eyes

Back to top

« Last Edit: Jan 4^th, 2019 at 7:50pm by Brian Ross »

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged