Australian Politics Forum - defending terrorists with misleading statistics

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146017
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #180 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 4:18pm

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 4:15pm:

Heart attacks are a bigger killer than the common cold even though most people do not get a heart attack but almost everyone gets a cold a few times, some people even die of it, particularly if they have some other diseases or are old.

Is the recognition that heart disease is a greater killer a 'cover up' up of the vastly more numerous incidences of the common cold? Only if you are a cockwomble like Bwian and Turd Bwianovic. Only then would you say, 'never mind the heart attacks, more people get the cold, let's focus on that. Focusing on heart disease is cholesterophobic and hypertensionophobic'.

It's not a cover up - it's changing the subject.

We're talking about the total number of incidents - not the death toll.

Capiche?

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44684

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #181 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 5:07pm

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 4:15pm:

Heart attacks are a bigger killer than the common cold even though most people do not get a heart attack but almost everyone gets a cold a few times, some people even die of it, particularly if they have some other diseases or are old.

Is the recognition that heart disease is a greater killer a 'cover up' up of the vastly more numerous incidences of the common cold? Only if you are a cockwomble like Bwian and Turd Bwianovic. Only then would you say, 'never mind the heart attacks, more people get the cold, let's focus on that. Focusing on heart disease is cholesterophobic and hypertensionophobic'.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Poor, poor, Soren, completely unable to follow a logical argument. Tsk, tsk, I really think you should have your phone taken away from you, Soren. I'll tell your nurse. I think it's time we put a stop to your outbreaks of Tourette's Syndrome in public. Run along, back to your psych ward, OK? Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 51285 At my desk.	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #182 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 7:29pm 13 pages in and Brian and Greg are still riding the Islamic terrorist bandwagon. Shameless.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44684

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #183 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:15pm

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 7:29pm:

13 pages in and Brian and Greg are still riding the Islamic terrorist bandwagon.

Shameless.

I am merely replying to the foolish comments directed to me, Freediver. If anybody is "riding the Terrorist bandwagon," it is you and your fellow Islamophobes. Without Muslims to hate, what would you do? You'd be lost. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 52860
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #184 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:19pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 5:07pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 4:15pm:

Heart attacks are a bigger killer than the common cold even though most people do not get a heart attack but almost everyone gets a cold a few times, some people even die of it, particularly if they have some other diseases or are old.

Is the recognition that heart disease is a greater killer a 'cover up' up of the vastly more numerous incidences of the common cold? Only if you are a cockwomble like Bwian and Turd Bwianovic. Only then would you say, 'never mind the heart attacks, more people get the cold, let's focus on that. Focusing on heart disease is cholesterophobic and hypertensionophobic'.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Poor, poor, Soren, completely unable to follow a logical argument. Tsk, tsk, I really think you should have your phone taken away from you, Soren. I'll tell your nurse. I think it's time we put a stop to your outbreaks of Tourette's Syndrome in public. Run along, back to your psych ward, OK? Roll Eyes

you have no valid argument, let alone logical.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44684

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #185 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:28pm

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:19pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 5:07pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 4:15pm:

Heart attacks are a bigger killer than the common cold even though most people do not get a heart attack but almost everyone gets a cold a few times, some people even die of it, particularly if they have some other diseases or are old.

Is the recognition that heart disease is a greater killer a 'cover up' up of the vastly more numerous incidences of the common cold? Only if you are a cockwomble like Bwian and Turd Bwianovic. Only then would you say, 'never mind the heart attacks, more people get the cold, let's focus on that. Focusing on heart disease is cholesterophobic and hypertensionophobic'.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Poor, poor, Soren, completely unable to follow a logical argument. Tsk, tsk, I really think you should have your phone taken away from you, Soren. I'll tell your nurse. I think it's time we put a stop to your outbreaks of Tourette's Syndrome in public. Run along, back to your psych ward, OK? Roll Eyes

you have no valid argument, let alone logical.

Says the person who invariably resorts to personal ad hominem argument rather than discussing the issue. Soren, you really are rather foolish. Tsk, tsk, time for the Nurse to give you more medication... Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 51285
At my desk.

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #186 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:28pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:15pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 7:29pm:

13 pages in and Brian and Greg are still riding the Islamic terrorist bandwagon.

Shameless.

I am merely replying to the foolish comments directed to me, Freediver. If anybody is "riding the Terrorist bandwagon," it is you and your fellow Islamophobes. Without Muslims to hate, what would you do? You'd be lost. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

You are on the Islamic terrorist bandwagon Brian. This is classic spineless apologetics.

You have lost the ability to form an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics to defend terrorists. You post in this thread compulsively, but are afraid of your own opinion on the thread topic. You are not "merely replying". You are afraid to reply.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44684

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #187 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:41pm

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:28pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:15pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 7:29pm:

13 pages in and Brian and Greg are still riding the Islamic terrorist bandwagon.

Shameless.

I am merely replying to the foolish comments directed to me, Freediver. If anybody is "riding the Terrorist bandwagon," it is you and your fellow Islamophobes. Without Muslims to hate, what would you do? You'd be lost. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

You are on the Islamic terrorist bandwagon Brian. This is classic spineless apologetics.

You have lost the ability to form an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics to defend terrorists. You post in this thread compulsively, but are afraid of your own opinion on the thread topic. You are not "merely replying". You are afraid to reply.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Need I remind you? When you answer my questions, I may answer yours, FD. Until then, you're just whistling dixie, OK? Now, run along back to the little kiddies' playground where all your Islamophobe friends are. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146017
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #188 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:41pm

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:28pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:15pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 7:29pm:

13 pages in and Brian and Greg are still riding the Islamic terrorist bandwagon.

Shameless.

I am merely replying to the foolish comments directed to me, Freediver. If anybody is "riding the Terrorist bandwagon," it is you and your fellow Islamophobes. Without Muslims to hate, what would you do? You'd be lost. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

You are on the Islamic terrorist bandwagon Brian. This is classic spineless apologetics.

You have lost the ability to form an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics to defend terrorists. You post in this thread compulsively, but are afraid of your own opinion on the thread topic. You are not "merely replying". You are afraid to reply.

Why do you ignore defend the 84% of terrorists in Europe who have nothing to do with Jihadism, FD?

I'm curious.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 52860
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #189 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:47pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:28pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:19pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 5:07pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 4:15pm:

Heart attacks are a bigger killer than the common cold even though most people do not get a heart attack but almost everyone gets a cold a few times, some people even die of it, particularly if they have some other diseases or are old.

Is the recognition that heart disease is a greater killer a 'cover up' up of the vastly more numerous incidences of the common cold? Only if you are a cockwomble like Bwian and Turd Bwianovic. Only then would you say, 'never mind the heart attacks, more people get the cold, let's focus on that. Focusing on heart disease is cholesterophobic and hypertensionophobic'.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Poor, poor, Soren, completely unable to follow a logical argument. Tsk, tsk, I really think you should have your phone taken away from you, Soren. I'll tell your nurse. I think it's time we put a stop to your outbreaks of Tourette's Syndrome in public. Run along, back to your psych ward, OK? Roll Eyes

you have no valid argument, let alone logical.

Says the person who invariably resorts to personal ad hominem argument rather than discussing the issue. Soren, you really are rather foolish. Tsk, tsk, time for the Nurse to give you more medication... Roll Eyes

I provide compelling arguments THEN I call you a cockwomble for being unable to do the same. You have not provided a compelling or logical or insightful argument here or anywhere. Eye-rolling, tut tutting, islamophobe-mongering are your intellectual limits and you will never let us forget that, ever.

You and your idiot son, Turd, imagine that faux-sophistry about 16 % and 84% is an argument because one number is greater than the other. But you merely do this to deny and ignore the fact that even the Europol report, where these numbers come from, identifies Islamic jihadi terrorism as by far the most serious and deadly terrorist threat.

You are a bunch of hopeless cockwomblles, wankpuffets and nobsockets.

See? - compelling argument THEN accurate characterisation of you two losers.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 52860
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #190 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:49pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:41pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:28pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:15pm:

freediver wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 7:29pm:

13 pages in and Brian and Greg are still riding the Islamic terrorist bandwagon.

Shameless.

I am merely replying to the foolish comments directed to me, Freediver. If anybody is "riding the Terrorist bandwagon," it is you and your fellow Islamophobes. Without Muslims to hate, what would you do? You'd be lost. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

You are on the Islamic terrorist bandwagon Brian. This is classic spineless apologetics.

You have lost the ability to form an opinion on whether Greg is using misleading statistics to defend terrorists. You post in this thread compulsively, but are afraid of your own opinion on the thread topic. You are not "merely replying". You are afraid to reply.

Why do you ignore defend the 84% of terrorists in Europe who have nothing to do with Jihadism, FD?

I'm curious.

Here's fvckwit No2, on cue.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 112919
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #191 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:50pm

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:47pm:

I provide compelling arguments THEN I call you a cockwomble for being unable to do the same. You have not provided a compelling or logical or insightful argument here or anywhere. Eye-rolling, tut tutting, islamophobe-mongering are your intellectual limits and you will never let us forget that, ever.

You and your idiot son, Turd, imagine that faux-sophistry about 16 % and 84% is an argument because one number is greater than the other. But you merely do this to deny and ignore the fact that even the Europol report, where these numbers come from, identifies Islamic jihadi terrorism as by far the most serious and deadly terrorist threat.

You are a bunch of hopeless cockwomblles, wankpuffets and nobsockets.

See? - compelling argument THEN accurate characterisation of you two losers.

I believe that Brian & Greggy fully understand that
and are only baiting anyone silly enough to argue with them.
All they want is attention and they're not sincere.

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44684

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #192 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:53pm

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:28pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:19pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 5:07pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 4:15pm:

Heart attacks are a bigger killer than the common cold even though most people do not get a heart attack but almost everyone gets a cold a few times, some people even die of it, particularly if they have some other diseases or are old.

Is the recognition that heart disease is a greater killer a 'cover up' up of the vastly more numerous incidences of the common cold? Only if you are a cockwomble like Bwian and Turd Bwianovic. Only then would you say, 'never mind the heart attacks, more people get the cold, let's focus on that. Focusing on heart disease is cholesterophobic and hypertensionophobic'.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Poor, poor, Soren, completely unable to follow a logical argument. Tsk, tsk, I really think you should have your phone taken away from you, Soren. I'll tell your nurse. I think it's time we put a stop to your outbreaks of Tourette's Syndrome in public. Run along, back to your psych ward, OK? Roll Eyes

you have no valid argument, let alone logical.

Says the person who invariably resorts to personal ad hominem argument rather than discussing the issue. Soren, you really are rather foolish. Tsk, tsk, time for the Nurse to give you more medication... Roll Eyes

I provide compelling arguments THEN I call you a cockwomble for being unable to do the same. You have not provided a compelling or logical or insightful argument here or anywhere. Eye-rolling, tut tutting, islamophobe-mongering are your intellectual limits and you will never let us forget that, ever.

You and your idiot son, Turd, imagine that faux-sophistry about 16 % and 84% is an argument because one number is greater than the other. But you merely do this to deny and ignore the fact that even the Europol report, where these numbers come from, identifies Islamic jihadi terrorism as by far the most serious and deadly terrorist threat.

You are a bunch of hopeless cockwomblles, wankpuffets and nobsockets.

See? - compelling argument THEN accurate characterisation of you two losers.

Poor, poor, Soren. Oh, dearie, dearie, me. Why is that invariably I am able to destroy any of your attempts that you claim are "logical" because they are shown to be based upon Islamophobia/Racism/Bigotry/etc.? I know more about politics and history than it appears you ever will. Run along, you're wasting all our time. In fact, is that your Nurse with your night-time medication, Soren? Time for beddy-byes. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 44684

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #193 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:57pm

Bobby. wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:50pm:

I believe that Brian & Greggy fully understand that
and are only baiting anyone silly enough to argue with them.
All they want is attention and they're not sincere.

Bobby, I am very sincere. I do not believe people should be condemned on the basis of association with other people. It is like claiming that all Italians are members of the Mafia. Demonstrably untrue, yet bigots will still occasionally claim it. Not all Muslims are evil, few support Terrorism and most are law-abiding, well adjusted and well assimilate to Western society. You however seem to resort to simplistic solutions to all crimes. If you're not allowed to hang people you get upset. Tsk, tsk. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 52860
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #194 - Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 9:00pm

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2019 at 8:53pm:

Why is that invariably I am able to destroy any of your attempts that you claim are "logical" because they are shown to be based upon Islamophobia/Racism/Bigotry/etc.? I know more about politics and history than it appears you ever will.

You know nothing and you can't think straight. You wouldn't know logic if it was up you, let alone having an insight and being able to articulate it. You are an inadequate fool, destroying only your own standing and reputation with every utterance, Bwian, Spineless Apologist-in-Chief.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged