|
Brian Ross
|
Frank wrote on Jan 1 st, 2019 at 9:06pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1 st, 2019 at 9:01pm: Frank wrote on Jan 1 st, 2019 at 6:45pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1 st, 2019 at 2:20pm: Frank wrote on Jan 1 st, 2019 at 12:04pm: Brian Ross wrote on Jan 1 st, 2019 at 11:40am: Frank wrote on Jan 1 st, 2019 at 10:48am: Although the total number of jihadist terrorist attacks decreased from 17 in 2015 to 13 attacks in 2016, of which 6 were linked to the so-called Islamic State (IS), 135 of the 142 victims of terrorist attacks in 2016 were killed in the 13 jihadist attacks. https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/2017-eu-terrorism-report-142-failed-...135 of the 142 dead were killed by jihadists and you cockwombles keep insisting that you are not deliberately misrepresenting the report by parrotting an irrelevant statistics merely to deflect attention from the scale of these murders for Allah. I am unsure who you're talking to, Soren? I have made no such claims. I have merely defended Greg from what appears, on the surface, to be unwarranted attacks against the EuroPol statistics. Until you address the reality that more non-Jihadist attacks occurred than Jihadist attacks, you're just whistling dixie, Soren. A not unusual situation for you, as we all know but still the truth of what you're doing...  As the report shows, jihad is by far the most deadly terrorist threat, dwarfing all others put together by an immense margin. That's not islamophobia or whistling dixie, cockwomble, thats reality - the thing you have been unmoored from for far too long. It may be the more deadly threat BUT and it is a big BUT, Soren, it happens less often - which is the point that Greg has made, using the EuroPol statistics. You appear unwilling to accept or recognise that Greg is arguing frequency, not deadliness. You really are being quite foolish, as are all the Islamophobes. Such silly billies. Mass murder happens much less often than posting incitement to terrorism, wankpuffin, but it is much more serious and its consequences are actually deadly. That is why everyone, from Europol to Interpol and ASIO and all the rest regard Islamic jihad a much, much more serious concern than Paddy muttering darkly into his Guinness somewhere in the bowels of Ireland or a Kurd plotting against some Turk or a hirsute Greek drinking too much ouzo and not shaving for three days. To grimace and gesticulate about numbers without paying attention to consequences of actions is the usual wanky idiocy that you and your alter ego, Turdy McNobsocket perpetrate on the innocent public here at Ozpolitic every day. THAT IS your terrorism, militant faarkwittery. You still refuse to accept reality, Soren. Terrorism occurs most frequently in Europe when committed by non-Islamists. It is indeed Paddy who commits the most Terrorist acts in Europe, not Mohammed. Frequency - how often something occurs. Get it yet? What DOES Paddy actually DO, cockwomble? How many are killed by Paddy compared to Mohammed? Why is the death toll irrelevant and the number of victimless events is all that matters, idiotic piss-soaked old fapper? No one, as far as I am aware, has claimed that these Terrorist events are "victimless", Soren. Nor have they claimed that the "death toll is irrelevant", except in your imagination. How about you argue the facts that Greg has presented - most Terrorist incidents in Europe are committed by non-Islamists, instead of haring off in wild directions? Or is that too hard for you? I suspect it is, going by your past performance but I am always willing to give it a chance...
|
Forum
Pages: 
defending terrorists with misleading statistics (Read 36945 times)
