|
PZ547
|
There's a ton of photograhpic evidence for disputed stuff. Take Chemtrails, for example. Bitchute, utube and the like have copious videos of Chemtrails being laid … even videos of Chems being laid across Australia
even satellite photographs and video of Chems being sprayed diagonally all up the Queensland coast … and that was years ago, and available from 'trusted' institutions such as BoM and NASA
too much evidence, to the point the owners of the site, 'Gaiaguys' were fired upon at night in their remote homestead. Their animals were killed brutally and many poisoned. Local police were aware of the attacks, but an MP who'd sold off protected land for a dollar an acre to his buddies and who was a big wig in the local Freemasonic society, and who was later rewarded by a prestigious position in Federal Parliament, succeeded in stitching up the couple and with help from a stinking little subsidiary of the Freemasons put those people in prison, well into their retirement. They were released after a few years and it was put about online that they'd 'moved to Tasmania' --- code for murdered, it's said
So there's that
Then there's Carnicom out of the US who spent their own money having Chemtrail residue independently analysed which proved the US (and Australia and elsewhere) were being poisoned via food, water and air by their own military/government. I think Carnicom's still up. They have an insane amount of proof of the chemical composition of Chemtrails for all to see. And millions have not only accessed Carnicon and similar investigators -- they've also seen and videoed Chemtrails being sprayed endlessly in Australia. Seen with their own eyes and captured on film and video. All the proof anyone could want
Military and others in the US and elsewhere were injected with syphilis some decades ago. They felt ill then became very ill and suspected their government was responsible. That was denied by government. Until, relatively recently, the government admitted to the public that yes, they had intentionally sickened their own people as an experiment. They're now paying the survivors compensation. Again, proof
So it depends what one's looking for when demanding proof
Me, I don't need anyone else's proof. I trust my senses and eyes. And every now and then, there's confirmation in the form of other witnesses to the same event. Not that I needed anyone's confirmation, but it's always nice to have
Only one third of humans experiences the paranormal, it's claimed. Usually, the paranormal occurs spontaneously, unsolicited, when the experiencer is going about his/her daily life. In my own experience, these events put me into what are known as altered-states, meaning, in my case, I function as a camera, recording to memory. But at the time of the event, all thought process is suspended. I'm rendered merely as a human camera or video recorder. As thought process is suspended for the duration of the event, I'm clearly incapable of 'thinking' I should get a camera. In any event, I do not possess or desire a mobile phone. I'm old school. When something happens, my first thought is not that I should record it in order to put it online. In any event, as said, I'm thrust without notice into what could be described as suspended animation. I've read that's because what is unfolding around me drains my human energy in order to manifest. That could be true, I have no idea
Many of the things I've witnessed of the paranormal type in my life are now appearing online as having occurred to others. Forty years ago, they weren't much discussed. The missing lower legs on ghosts, for example. I've no idea why the lower legs don't appear and didn't notice it myself until after the appearance of the second ghost. A woman confided in me that her daughter had seen the ghost of her grandmother but was puzzled by the fact the grandmother didn't have lower legs and appeared to glide rather than walk. The mother suspected her daughter of lying about the event. I confided to the woman that I'd noted the same thing about ghosts and was able to restore the girl's credibility in part at least. Now others are telling publicly that the ghosts they saw lacked lower legs. Internet has given the world its own market square in which to share experiences. And those, like myself, who'd kept things to themselves are now able to share and confirm each others experiences. It's a great thing
Not everyone experiences the paranormal (umbrella term). As said, it's been estimated only one third have such experiences. But to be remembered .. and we've discussed this before .. is that humans are believed by science to be capable of seeing/hearing a mere 1% of all that exists around them. Some have tried to convince it's 7%. Still not much of the whole picture
People who've had paranormal experiences have enough to think about without worrying what the blind two thirds of society have to say about it, quite frankly, and they are not required to provide 'proof' to anyone. What can we say to the disbelievers (with whom I have no quarrel) other than Seek and Ye Might Find
|
Forum
Pages: 
