https://cleantechnica.com/2018/09/27/1st-year-income-from-tesla-battery-in-south...Lots of opponents of battery storage for electricity that has been generated by wind, solar, and other renewables like to focus on how much those systems cost. Take the Hornsdale battery installed by Tesla last year in South Australia. It cost $66 million, and to hear some folks in Australia tell it, that money will place a huge burden on local utility customers forever. They conveniently forget to mention that the battery is a source of income to Neoen, the French company that owns it and the adjacent wind farm.
According to The Guardian, Neoen will recover more than one third of the $66 million cost of the Hornsdale battery in its first year of operation.
A return on investment of three years is remarkable and something that should make other utility companies sit up and take notice. The payback time for most of their generating plants and infrastructure is usually measured in decades, not a few years.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/sep/27/south-australias-tesla-batter...SO this has stabilized the grid in SA and has been making lots of money.
If it keeps making that money in its 10 year life it will make 230million , and also 233% profit on cost, not really a tombstone.
There was so much crap about it being useless a year ago and turns out its profitable and very helpful to SA's grid