Bias_2012 wrote on Aug 24
th, 2018 at 1:06am:
freediver wrote on Aug 23
rd, 2018 at 10:08pm:
Is this a book you read, or something you came up with yourself?
It reminds me of the penultimate chapter of the Harari book I just read. He points out that there is no biological benefit to being happy all the time. The hormones or whatever that control our emotional state naturally return to neutral even if the external influence that caused happiness is still present. I don't think he went so far as to say it must be balanced by unhappiness, but that might be splitting hairs.
Tolle prefers to use terms like "at peace" than happiness as the benefit of his philosophy.
That's basically what I found. In the charts I did, which were plot lines, there was "halfway" points as the plot line went through the cycles. On one side was Feast and the other side was Famine, but the plot line in every cycle would reach no-mans land, neither feast nor famine, and that's only natural because any type of sine wave always has a center line indicating the mid way point. I agree with that guy whoever he is. I tracked my emotional states while I was plotting the cycles and there were parts of the cycle where I naturally felt mild depression and other parts where I felt like I wanted to get right out of my chair and enthusiastically get some work done. Those feelings were consistent in every cycle and in the same parts of the cycles
It wasn't something I just came up with, I've explained already that it was a discovery I made. I was researching left and right thinking, why is there left and right? It turns out that left and right originates from the Feast and Famine Variable. Biologically some people are right and some people are left. You can see in our parliaments, a balance between left and right is fought over every day they sit. Whoever wins on any given day will be happy, the losers will be unhappy. One is in feast, one is in famine, and that's the very formula I used to find the Variable
What the left and right politicians are really doing is replicating the Variable albeit in a crude manner. They just don't know they're doing that. If they knew how the Feast and Famine Variable in their minds really worked, they wouldn't be shouting at each other. I don't shout at myself or anyone else if I'm in famine, I think rationally and calmly to find a way out of it, and I always find a way if it's important enough
That said, an Opposition knows sooner or later they will gain government, and the government at the time knows it will sit in opposition sometimes. Well, this also originates from the Feast and Famine Variable deep in the human mind. However, and this is important, the Variable can change slightly, it's a variable and we'd all be dead if it didn't change, so any attempt to keep the Variable static by not willingly allowing for change can have catastrophic consequences
I contend that the willingness to change is paramount because our natural cycles will leave us behind if we don't ... and then we must go through hell and turmoil to catch up. Who wants hell and turmoil?
quite interesting.
similar to the order and chaos symbolism of the Dow (the ying yang).
happiness is often sought through "stimulation" but that has a "diminishing return".
its probably better to be "engaged" then "stimulated".
Carl Jung said that certain activities will be "meaningful" to certain people and when you find an intimation of meaning you should pursue that , because thats where personal growth will come from.
so you are naturally drawn to pursue things which will expand you.
indeed, doing new things , has been proven to turn on new genes and encode new proteins.
this may be the reason for the mythological idea of going on a pilgrimage.
because it expands you. it literally does make you more then you were before.
But if we look at someone going on an exciting adventure, maybe take Cook on the Endeavour as an example. then would we really want Cook to be just happy all the time.
would we be expecting him to be happy when he hit the reef.
obviously not.
what we would expect is that he would be making "order from the chaos" and this seems to be where maximum engagement comes from.
it would make me very bored to just ride a safe horse every day.
but riding a chaotic horse and making it into a safe horse is making order from chaos.
and i find that meaningful. (and engaging), happiness doesnt really come into it