Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12
Send Topic Print
Why David DuByne is so very wrong (Read 24811 times)
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #90 - Apr 26th, 2018 at 7:17pm
 
No lees, I can see what happens around me and adjust and adapt. You are the 19th century fossil. Poor fossil.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122093
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #91 - Apr 26th, 2018 at 7:29pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 26th, 2018 at 7:16pm:
You could, if you wanted to, feel sorry for Booby.

Why wasn’t he given an education? He is not a nice person—ad homs just stream from him—but I think has some intelligence unlike, say, The Moronic.

But no capacity, no background in science, his fear of AGW saw him believe a snake oil seller like Dubyne. A blue aurora means an ice age. A heavy snowfall means cooling—no, it means precipitation.

Somebody tells him to try the undamped system crap. It goes down like a lead balloon because Booby doesn’t understand him. Who told you to try the feedback fairy tale Booby? Then someone tells you about cloud chambers—something I learned about in 1968—but you don’t realise the conditions in a cloud chamber are not the same as in the atmosphere.

The globe is warming, Booby, not cooling and for gods sake realise that before you end up in the booby hatch!




Monk - the way you babble on I doubt you  have even a  1st year Uni understanding of science.
Even kids at school know more than you.

The first thing you get wrong is that contrary evidence cannot be ignored.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21533
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #92 - Apr 26th, 2018 at 7:30pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 26th, 2018 at 7:17pm:
No lees, I can see what happens around me and adjust and adapt. You are the 19th century fossil. Poor fossil.


But you are also over 70 and the climate doesn't seem to be changing that fast. Even if you do go and hibernate in Tasmania. Wink

So why won't you tell us about the discrepancy in the NOAA data? Each time you are asked you either skulk off or get your tits in a tangle and get the rags on. Not a good look.

Surely a man of your scientific integrity can answer the question.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #93 - Apr 26th, 2018 at 7:57pm
 
I am 70—for a little while that.

One thing I will say about myself: I can stare unpleasant facts in the face. That allowed me to keep one business going in the face of difficulties that would have destroyed other people.

My concern is not so much for myself, I have said before that I will likely be safely and cosily dead before the real nasties show themselves. I am concerned for great nephews and great nieces and their kids who will have to face the consequences now becoming apparent. I would to have them given a bit of a break.

Cowards deny, bigger cowards seek refuge in fairy tales. Not for me.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21533
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #94 - Apr 26th, 2018 at 8:16pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 26th, 2018 at 7:57pm:
I am 70—for a little while that.

One thing I will say about myself: I can stare unpleasant facts in the face. That allowed me to keep one business going in the face of difficulties that would have destroyed other people.

My concern is not so much for myself, I have said before that I will likely be safely and cosily dead before the real nasties show themselves. I am concerned for great nephews and great nieces and their kids who will have to face the consequences now becoming apparent. I would to have them given a bit of a break.

Cowards deny, bigger cowards seek refuge in fairy tales. Not for me.


And you still won't answer the question. Now is that cowardly or what?

So your fairy tale, that does not include any dis-conformities in the data, how do you convince yourself that it is all the fault of "deniers"? That it is all a chimera?

Or perhaps you have no scientific integrity.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #95 - Apr 26th, 2018 at 8:36pm
 
Aaawwwwwwwww grandpa is trying to sound all up to date and stuff.

Thanks for the laugh Lees ahahahahahahahaha
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21533
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #96 - Apr 26th, 2018 at 8:37pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 26th, 2018 at 8:36pm:
Aaawwwwwwwww grandpa is trying to sound all up to date and stuff.

Thanks for the laugh Lees ahahahahahahahaha


Still dodging the question. You are a fraud.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #97 - Apr 27th, 2018 at 6:26am
 
Let us look at the evidence I have put up.

1. Temperature graph. Shows the globe is warming. Booby says the data is rigged—no actual evidence of the rigging given. Trump and Pruitt are the ones trying to hide the evidence, not NASA/NOAA/NSIDC/MetOffice/BuMet.

2. Graphs of Arctic ice. Definite decrease in Arctic ice extent and even bigger decrease in ice volume.

3. Nearly all glaciers are retreating bar a few benefitting from increased precipitation that AGW brings.

4. There is 46% more CO2 in the atmosphere than there was in 1850. Isotopic analysis of the oxygen atoms in the CO2 molecules show they came from burning fossil fuels. There is a carbon cycle but we add CO2 on top of that.

5. We have the spectroscopic evidence that H2O combined with CO2 block IR radiation from escaping to space. IR radiation is how a black body rids itself of heat imparted by radiation, in the case of the earth from sunlight.

6. Sea level is rising from the melting of glaciers and ice sheets and thermal expansion of the oceans


None of this stuff is hard to understand. The message is pretty grim and many do not want to understand it and are ready to listen to deniers and frauds many of whom are paid by fossil fuel interests who want to keep selling fossil fuels. Many just decide it is too hard and decide to ignore it. That is not the way to deal with unpleasant facts.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122093
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #98 - Apr 27th, 2018 at 6:46am
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 27th, 2018 at 6:26am:
Let us look at the evidence I have put up.

1. Temperature graph. Shows the globe is warming. Booby says the data is rigged—no actual evidence of the rigging given. Trump and Pruitt are the ones trying to hide the evidence, not NASA/NOAA/NSIDC/MetOffice/BuMet.

2. Graphs of Arctic ice. Definite decrease in Arctic ice extent and even bigger decrease in ice volume.

3. Nearly all glaciers are retreating bar a few benefitting from increased precipitation that AGW brings.

4. There is 46% more CO2 in the atmosphere than there was in 1850. Isotopic analysis of the oxygen atoms in the CO2 molecules show they came from burning fossil fuels. There is a carbon cycle but we add CO2 on top of that.

5. We have the spectroscopic evidence that H2O combined with CO2 block IR radiation from escaping to space. IR radiation is how a black body rids itself of heat imparted by radiation, in the case of the earth from sunlight.

6. Sea level is rising from the melting of glaciers and ice sheets and thermal expansion of the oceans


None of this stuff is hard to understand. The message is pretty grim and many do not want to understand it and are ready to listen to deniers and frauds many of whom are paid by fossil fuel interests who want to keep selling fossil fuels. Many just decide it is too hard and decide to ignore it. That is not the way to deal with unpleasant facts.



What about the contrary evidence?

332 pages of such evidence posted on this forum.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #99 - Apr 27th, 2018 at 7:13am
 
Strip away the padding and the record of cold events is much less.

And that is all there is, local cold events.

No evidence of anything except some places were cold for a while. Since heat events are rigorously excluded by Dubyne there is no integrity to what he puts up.

Temperatures—increasing, ice decreasing. Sea levels rising. Glaciers retreating. That is the reality.

Hail is not a symptom of cooling. It is formed high in the atmosphere in massive thunderstorms. Dubyne incidentally mentions increased precipitation—where does the extra moisture come from that precipitates as rain, hail or snow? AGW, warmer oceans evaporating more into warmer air that can now carry 8% more moisture than it could in the 1800s.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122093
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #100 - Apr 27th, 2018 at 7:31am
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 27th, 2018 at 7:13am:
Strip away the padding and the record of cold events is much less.

And that is all there is, local cold events.

No evidence of anything except some places were cold for a while. Since heat events are rigorously excluded by Dubyne there is no integrity to what he puts up.

Temperatures—increasing, ice decreasing. Sea levels rising. Glaciers retreating. That is the reality.

Hail is not a symptom of cooling. It is formed high in the atmosphere in massive thunderstorms. Dubyne incidentally mentions increased precipitation—where does the extra moisture come from that precipitates as rain, hail or snow? AGW, warmer oceans evaporating more into warmer air that can now carry 8% more moisture than it could in the 1800s.



No way - in a warming climate we wouldn't be having record cold
events all over the world.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #101 - Apr 27th, 2018 at 7:36am
 
We don’t have record cold events all over the world.

The distribution of temperatures over the last 100 years has shifted to the warm side but that still leaves some in the cold region. Temperatures have increased by 1.2°C, not 12°C.

If you were to look for record heat events you would find many many more of them. But you won’t—there is that lack of education and the lack of integrity coming through. You cannot plausibly deny the global temperature has risen and you cannot plausibly deny that ice is retreating, permafrost is melting and so on.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #102 - Apr 27th, 2018 at 8:28am
 
This figure is from the BoM “State of the Climate 2016” report:

...

Have a look and a think, if you can think.

NOAA produced a similar chart for world temperatures.

Cold events are still possible—no one has ever said they aren’t—but hot events are more possible and occur more often. But the distribution of temperatures has shifted to the warm side and that is why ice is melting and sea levels rising and more evaporation-precipitation is taking place.

If we really were in an ice age then the temperature distribution would have moved to the cold side.

A statistical test for the difference between means, Student’s t-test for example, would find the difference between the means is significant, that is, temperatures really have shifted to the warm side.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Apr 27th, 2018 at 8:35am by Jovial Monk »  

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #103 - Apr 27th, 2018 at 11:59am
 
Bobby. wrote on Apr 26th, 2018 at 7:29pm:
The first thing you get wrong is that contrary evidence cannot be ignored.


This comes from a bloke who thinks we are in an ice age despite temperatures increasing and ice decreasing.

Get the beam out of your eye before trying to remove the speck you think is in mine. That biblical enough for you, pseudochristian?
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122093
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Why David DuByne is so very wrong
Reply #104 - Apr 27th, 2018 at 12:02pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 27th, 2018 at 7:36am:
We don’t have record cold events all over the world.





Yes we do  - what about the bombogenesis?

That's just one of 1000s of record cold events that haven't just affected
one tiny town but entire continents.
You don't even listen to the evidence.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12
Send Topic Print