Australian Politics Forum - Relationship with Vets.

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Relationship with Vets.
Reply #15 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:26pm

Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 8:44am:

Vic wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 8:42am:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2018 at 10:34pm:

That Thread over at Extremism disgusts me. It was started by Bobby in Chat and moved to Extremism by Vic......who says he is a Vet.

WTF?????

I say Bobby started that Thread as a very direct personal attack on Karnal. He then tried to pretend to fawn on Karnal, but with every post made, it is quite clear the entire Thread is a personal and pile on attack. Just disgraceful.

We have several Members here who suggest they are Vets. For example ~ Karnal, Big 'Old, Grappler and Vic. (Sorry if I have missed anyone.) I would never have the hide to suggest they are frauds, and to allow the speculation and personal abuse that Thread deliberately invites and provokes is just appalling.

I have never said I was a Vet. I have mentioned my time in the Navy, including my time on Submarines but I cannot recall ever classing myself as a "Vet". To me, a "Vet" is one who has served their country in warlike or government nominated actions and i have not served in those.

The term "Veteran" is now used to describe any ex servicemen however, I would prefer it remain to describe those who have served in some theatre of war or warlike operations

I used the term in exactly that sense.

Well then you are wrong. Yet again. The term "veteran" is not applicable to anyone who has not served in a war zone.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39746 Gender:	Re: Relationship with Vets. Reply #16 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:30pm Would you like some dictionary links to prove you wrong or will you go look for yourself, and save me embarrassing you?
Back to top	IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Relationship with Vets.
Reply #17 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:31pm

rhino wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 8:44am:

Vic wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 8:42am:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2018 at 10:34pm:

That Thread over at Extremism disgusts me. It was started by Bobby in Chat and moved to Extremism by Vic......who says he is a Vet.

WTF?????

I say Bobby started that Thread as a very direct personal attack on Karnal. He then tried to pretend to fawn on Karnal, but with every post made, it is quite clear the entire Thread is a personal and pile on attack. Just disgraceful.

We have several Members here who suggest they are Vets. For example ~ Karnal, Big 'Old, Grappler and Vic. (Sorry if I have missed anyone.) I would never have the hide to suggest they are frauds, and to allow the speculation and personal abuse that Thread deliberately invites and provokes is just appalling.

I have never said I was a Vet. I have mentioned my time in the Navy, including my time on Submarines but I cannot recall ever classing myself as a "Vet". To me, a "Vet" is one who has served their country in warlike or government nominated actions and i have not served in those.

The term "Veteran" is now used to describe any ex servicemen however, I would prefer it remain to describe those who have served in some theatre of war or warlike operations

I used the term in exactly that sense.

Well then you are wrong. Yet again. The term "veteran" is not applicable to anyone who has not served in a war zone.

Get that definition for the Department of Veterans Affairs did you?

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 118899 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Relationship with Vets. Reply #18 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:34pm So Aussie has a new trick - find a popular thread and then divert the traffic to his forum. That's dirty playing Aussie - you should be ashamed of yourself. Post on the original thread. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1523018740/240#247
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39746 Gender:	Re: Relationship with Vets. Reply #19 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:34pm Quote: Get that definition for the Department of Veterans Affairs did you? Says it all!
Back to top	IP Logged

rhino Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17179 Gender:	Re: Relationship with Vets. Reply #20 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:38pm Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:30pm: Would you like some dictionary links to prove you wrong or will you go look for yourself, and save me embarrassing you? Irrelevant.
Back to top	IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Relationship with Vets.
Reply #21 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:39pm

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:31pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 8:44am:

Vic wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 8:42am:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2018 at 10:34pm:

That Thread over at Extremism disgusts me. It was started by Bobby in Chat and moved to Extremism by Vic......who says he is a Vet.

WTF?????

I say Bobby started that Thread as a very direct personal attack on Karnal. He then tried to pretend to fawn on Karnal, but with every post made, it is quite clear the entire Thread is a personal and pile on attack. Just disgraceful.

We have several Members here who suggest they are Vets. For example ~ Karnal, Big 'Old, Grappler and Vic. (Sorry if I have missed anyone.) I would never have the hide to suggest they are frauds, and to allow the speculation and personal abuse that Thread deliberately invites and provokes is just appalling.

I have never said I was a Vet. I have mentioned my time in the Navy, including my time on Submarines but I cannot recall ever classing myself as a "Vet". To me, a "Vet" is one who has served their country in warlike or government nominated actions and i have not served in those.

The term "Veteran" is now used to describe any ex servicemen however, I would prefer it remain to describe those who have served in some theatre of war or warlike operations

I used the term in exactly that sense.

Well then you are wrong. Yet again. The term "veteran" is not applicable to anyone who has not served in a war zone.

Get that definition for the Department of Veterans Affairs did you?

Lol, you yourself stated this Quote:

I would prefer it remain to describe those who have served in some theatre of war or warlike operations

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17179 Gender:	Re: Relationship with Vets. Reply #22 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:40pm Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:34pm: Quote: Get that definition for the Department of Veterans Affairs did you? Says it all! see previous post. PWNED here again here Ozzy, not having a good run are you?
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39746
Gender: male

Re: Relationship with Vets.
Reply #23 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:40pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:34pm:

So Aussie has a new trick -

find a popular thread and
then divert the traffic to his forum.

That's dirty playing Aussie - you should be ashamed of yourself.

Post on the original thread.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1523018740/240#247

Why do you expect me to post in a disgraceful Thread that I say ought be deleted before further damage is done to this Forum? This constant 'pile on' bashing of selected Members has to stop.

Back to top

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Relationship with Vets.
Reply #24 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:42pm

rhino wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:39pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:31pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 8:44am:

Vic wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 8:42am:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2018 at 10:34pm:

That Thread over at Extremism disgusts me. It was started by Bobby in Chat and moved to Extremism by Vic......who says he is a Vet.

WTF?????

I say Bobby started that Thread as a very direct personal attack on Karnal. He then tried to pretend to fawn on Karnal, but with every post made, it is quite clear the entire Thread is a personal and pile on attack. Just disgraceful.

We have several Members here who suggest they are Vets. For example ~ Karnal, Big 'Old, Grappler and Vic. (Sorry if I have missed anyone.) I would never have the hide to suggest they are frauds, and to allow the speculation and personal abuse that Thread deliberately invites and provokes is just appalling.

I have never said I was a Vet. I have mentioned my time in the Navy, including my time on Submarines but I cannot recall ever classing myself as a "Vet". To me, a "Vet" is one who has served their country in warlike or government nominated actions and i have not served in those.

The term "Veteran" is now used to describe any ex servicemen however, I would prefer it remain to describe those who have served in some theatre of war or warlike operations

I used the term in exactly that sense.

Well then you are wrong. Yet again. The term "veteran" is not applicable to anyone who has not served in a war zone.

Get that definition for the Department of Veterans Affairs did you?

Lol, you yourself stated this Quote:

I would prefer it remain to describe those who have served in some theatre of war or warlike operations

Yeah that was Vic, genius. Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39746
Gender: male

Re: Relationship with Vets.
Reply #25 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:43pm

rhino wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:40pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:34pm:

Quote:

Get that definition for the Department of Veterans Affairs did you?

Says it all!

see previous post. PWNED here again here Ozzy, not having a good run are you?

There you go yet again....marking your own homework. Does the Department of Veteran's Affairs ONLY cater for ex-servicemen/women who have seen active service in a 'war' zone?

Back to top

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Relationship with Vets.
Reply #26 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:44pm

Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:40pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:34pm:

So Aussie has a new trick -

find a popular thread and
then divert the traffic to his forum.

That's dirty playing Aussie - you should be ashamed of yourself.

Post on the original thread.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1523018740/240#247

Why do you expect me to post in a disgraceful Thread that I say ought be deleted before further damage is done to this Forum? This constant 'pile on' bashing of selected Members has to stop.

Karnal brings these attack upon himself, he is just getting what he so richly deserves, nothing more.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39746
Gender: male

Re: Relationship with Vets.
Reply #27 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:44pm

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:42pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:39pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:31pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 8:44am:

Vic wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 8:42am:

Aussie wrote on Apr 7^th, 2018 at 10:34pm:

That Thread over at Extremism disgusts me. It was started by Bobby in Chat and moved to Extremism by Vic......who says he is a Vet.

WTF?????

I say Bobby started that Thread as a very direct personal attack on Karnal. He then tried to pretend to fawn on Karnal, but with every post made, it is quite clear the entire Thread is a personal and pile on attack. Just disgraceful.

We have several Members here who suggest they are Vets. For example ~ Karnal, Big 'Old, Grappler and Vic. (Sorry if I have missed anyone.) I would never have the hide to suggest they are frauds, and to allow the speculation and personal abuse that Thread deliberately invites and provokes is just appalling.

I have never said I was a Vet. I have mentioned my time in the Navy, including my time on Submarines but I cannot recall ever classing myself as a "Vet". To me, a "Vet" is one who has served their country in warlike or government nominated actions and i have not served in those.

The term "Veteran" is now used to describe any ex servicemen however, I would prefer it remain to describe those who have served in some theatre of war or warlike operations

I used the term in exactly that sense.

Well then you are wrong. Yet again. The term "veteran" is not applicable to anyone who has not served in a war zone.

Get that definition for the Department of Veterans Affairs did you?

Lol, you yourself stated this Quote:

I would prefer it remain to describe those who have served in some theatre of war or warlike operations

Yeah that was Vic, genius. Grin

"see previous post. PWNED here again here Ozzy, not having a good run are you?"

Cheesy

Back to top

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: Relationship with Vets.
Reply #28 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:48pm

Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:43pm:

rhino wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:40pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:34pm:

Quote:

Get that definition for the Department of Veterans Affairs did you?

Says it all!

see previous post. PWNED here again here Ozzy, not having a good run are you?

There you go yet again....marking your own homework. Does the Department of Veteran's Affairs ONLY cater for ex-servicemen/women who have seen active service in a 'war' zone?

See the DoD which Vet Affairs is a part of isn't as rude to ex- & current servicemen and women as some of the people who post here. Not you Aus, but the list of deadsh1ts is quite long and they seem to become very active around the lead up to ANZAC Day weirdly enough.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39746
Gender: male

Re: Relationship with Vets.
Reply #29 - Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:48pm

BigOl64 wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:44pm:

Aussie wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:40pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 8^th, 2018 at 3:34pm:

So Aussie has a new trick -

find a popular thread and
then divert the traffic to his forum.

That's dirty playing Aussie - you should be ashamed of yourself.

Post on the original thread.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1523018740/240#247

Why do you expect me to post in a disgraceful Thread that I say ought be deleted before further damage is done to this Forum? This constant 'pile on' bashing of selected Members has to stop.

Karnal brings these attack upon himself, he is just getting what he so richly deserves, nothing more.

No, he does not. No-one here sets out to bring attacks upon themself and that is exactly what that Thread is.....a direct personal attack on a Member which is totally contradictory to the Rules.

Quote:

Personal criticism
Do not post personal criticism of other members.......

That entire Thread breaches that Rule, and the Moderator ought to delete it.

Back to top

IP Logged