John_Taverner wrote on Jan 26
th, 2018 at 8:11am:
https://www.livescience.com/61526-doomsday-clock-update-2018.html?utm_source=not...Today (Jan. 25), the clock has crept even closer to the zero hour. This morning, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (BAS) — an organization of science and policy experts who assess human scientific advancement and risk — revealed the clock's new "time," with the hands now standing at 2 minutes to midnight.
Quote:...it reflects the breakdown of global efforts to reduce reliance on and risk of nuclear weapons; increased posturing and threats regarding the use of nuclear weapons; and an insufficient response worldwide to curb the impacts of climate change. [Apocalypse Now: The Gear You Need to Survive Doomsday]
It is not any one of those factors, but a combination of all of them — and the weakening of public faith in knowledgeable expert voices — that prompted the change to the clock, Lawrence Krauss, chair of the BAS Board of Sponsors and director of the Origins Project at Arizona State University, told reporters.
This says it all. Too many armchair experts who prefer a simple explanation. You don't have to look far to find them.
1. Something drastic needs to happen in North Korea, and by drastic, I don't mean the "my button is bigger than yours" approach. A Chinese invasion may be the best option. (maybe the Chinese would have an issue with that)
2. Something drastic needs to happen in the US. The current anti-science stance is destructive to both the US economy and the environment.
So now your equating AGW to the doomsday clock and nuclear war.
A world with you lot at the helm would be a very SAD and confusing one.
If you want to do something worthwhile for the environment I suggest focusing your attention on things like
1. A plastic ocean
2. Deforestation
3. Pollution in all its forms
That would be a good start and stop this bullshit of selling carbon credits on wall street will save the world from AGW.
BTW welcome back................