Auggie wrote on Apr 19
th, 2018 at 3:14pm:
In August, 1914:
27,000 men were killed in a single day.
July 1, 1916:
19,240 men were killed on that day.
A sickening carousel of European slaughter, ignored and passed over by ignoramuses and their rightard apologists.
Yes, absolutely ghastly, but you are trying make a comparison that is faulty. These casualty lists are dismissed by some, as the straight civil crime that should be dealt with in court, or acts by Muzlims who mis-interpret the Koran. Islam has no central authority, which is convenient, because no one can be blamed, if the Koran is mis-interpreted.
Not too many intelligent people can honestly say this is not about religion. It started in the 1980s when various sects, who could not agree on anything else, decided to look for a way to address the Muzlim loss of self-esteem after Israel beat them 3 times. They did this with the Koran, identifying all non-believers as conspirators against Islam.
But the other idea that has been touted below, is that somehow these casualty lists are not valid because most,
if not all, these atrocities happen in war zones. That suggestion is indecent, and shows some people will clutch at any straw. It does not take into account thousands in Nigeria, the Philippines, France, Germany, Belgium, UK, USA, Thailand, China, India, etc, etc who have been the victims of Mohammedans in the last 30 years.
Yes, its a war zone, Islam against itself and the Infidels, which ever is conveniently close by. But the defenders of Islam say its not, its just bad guys who should be in jail.
Their ridiculous proposition is always that not all Muzlims are terrorists. In philosophy that is what is called sophistry. Half a truth used to appear relevant. And while they stoop that low to win their argument, they condone these non-violent Muzlims remaining silent in the face of one atrocity after another.