Australian Politics Forum

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59410
Gender: male

Re: Homophobia
Reply #60 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:10pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 2:31pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 2:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 2:23pm:

Frank wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 12:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 10:28am:

Study: Homophobes May Be Hidden Homosexuals

"Homophobes should consider a little self-reflection, suggests a new study finding those individuals who are most hostile toward gays and hold strong anti-gay views may themselves have same-sex desires, albeit undercover ones."

Needless to say, this is a pretty homophobic statement and attitude. 'Uhh, gays are self-haters and hide behind pretence normalcy.'
You are unthinking and thick as Mothra. Mindless virtue signalling uber alles is your motto. The stupider the better for both of you.

The statement isn't mine.

It comes from a scientist.

Seems you failed again.

One day you'll get something right, but today isn't that day.

"Lashing out may ultimately be an indicator of the person's own internal conflict with sexual orientation."

What? You posted it because you don't share the view?

I posted it as a source of information.

Having seen the reaction, I'm starting to think the scientists definitely might be onto something.

"Lashing out may ultimately be an indicator of the person's own internal conflict with sexual orientation."

It is a homophobic piece of information.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154407
Gender: male

Re: Homophobia
Reply #61 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:12pm

John Smith wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:03pm:

Does homophobia have anything to do with homosexual tendencies?

Apparently, the answer to this age-old question is an unabashed “yes.”

pay attention Bobby.

A fascinating study.

"Each participant watched three four-minute videos — one of heterosexual sex, one of lesbian sex and one of gay male sex. During the videos, the men had devices attached to their penis's to detect and measure sexual arousal.

"The results concluded that both homophobic and non-homophobic men displayed increased penis circumference when watching straight and lesbian porn. However, only the homophobic men showed heightened penis arousal during the gay male porn; the non-homophobic men remained flaccid.

"Not surprisingly though, it was the homophobic men who reported no feeling of sexual arousal by gay male porn during the screen. Obviously, their penises reported otherwise."

For those who missed it:

"only the homophobic men showed heightened penis arousal during the gay male porn".

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154407
Gender: male

Re: Homophobia
Reply #62 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:14pm

" ... psychoanalysts often describe homophobia as an anxiety or anticipatory anxiety elicited by homosexual individuals.

"This anxiety is believed to stem from the “straight” individual's fear of possibly being or becoming a homosexual.

"Psychoanalytic theories have long postulated that homophobia may be a result of repressed homosexual urges, or a form of latent homosexuality (homosexual arousal, which the individual is either unaware of or denies)."

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 120957 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Homophobia Reply #63 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:18pm Greggy, I think it's more likely that people who take every opportunity to defend homosexuals & promote their filthy lifestyles are in fact homosexuals. i.e. YOU
Back to top	IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 59410
Gender: male

Re: Homophobia
Reply #64 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:20pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:14pm:

" ... psychoanalysts often describe homophobia as an anxiety or anticipatory anxiety elicited by homosexual individuals.

"This anxiety is believed to stem from the “straight” individual's fear of possibly being or becoming a homosexual.

"Psychoanalytic theories have long postulated that homophobia may be a result of repressed homosexual urges, or a form of latent homosexuality (homosexual arousal, which the individual is either unaware of or denies)."

And you now support every psychonanalytic theory??

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 154407 Gender:	Re: Homophobia Reply #65 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:20pm "Whether examined from a scientific perspective or from real life examples, it is likely that homophobia has some correlation with homosexual tendencies, that a homophobe might actually be a closeted homosexual himself or herself."
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 154407 Gender:	Re: Homophobia Reply #66 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:21pm "By being afraid to come out, the homophobe emerges as a strongly anti-gay person instead. "The case of intolerance toward others may actually be a case of intolerance toward one's true self."
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Homophobia
Reply #67 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:25pm

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:18pm:

Greggy,
I think it's more likely that people who take every opportunity
to defend homosexuals & promote their filthy lifestyles
are in fact homosexuals. i.e. YOU

That argument is ridiculous booby. It would mean that people who defend animal rights, say the use of free range chickens as opposed to battery hens for example, are in fact themselves chickens?

Do you see just how stupid that argument is?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154407
Gender: male

Re: Homophobia
Reply #68 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:25pm

Here's the study.

Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal?

"The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29); they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992). Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies."

Bottom line: the homophobes all got a hard on when watching gay porn videos.

Fascinating.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 154407 Gender:	Re: Homophobia Reply #69 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 4:22pm "Homophobia is more pronounced in individuals with an unacknowledged attraction to the same sex and who grew up with authoritarian parents who forbade such desires, a series of psychology studies demonstrates."
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36398
Gender: female

Re: Homophobia
Reply #70 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm

Gnads wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 1:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 11:19am:

Ajax wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 11:12am:

It's a democracy we live in Gregg, we have the right to say "NO"

That's absolutely correct, and nobody is trying to take that right away from you.

"Lashing out may ultimately be an indicator of the person's own internal conflict with sexual orientation."

The people doing the lashing out are the LGBITQ community & their supporters.

Doing nothing for their cause except entrenching in those who they need to support them the intention of voting NO!

Don't get what they want throw a tantrum ... start hurling abuse using the megatrendy ultra galoptics weasel words ..........

Homophobe, bigot etc.

It's a wonder they haven't trotted out "racist" .....

seeings they abuse the application of that word as well.

This argument always amuses me tremendously.

Years of attacks on gays and lesbians, beatings, persecutions, deaths even ... and none of you who now feel "bullied" by the nasty yes campaigners had a single word to say.

But heaven forfend someone be passionate about human rights. It's just enough to make you hold your breath until you turn blue, rrrrrrrright?

It's political correctness gone mad!

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36398
Gender: female

Re: Homophobia
Reply #71 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 4:55pm

John Smith wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:25pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:18pm:

Greggy,
I think it's more likely that people who take every opportunity
to defend homosexuals & promote their filthy lifestyles
are in fact homosexuals. i.e. YOU

That argument is ridiculous booby. It would mean that people who defend animal rights, say the use of free range chickens as opposed to battery hens for example, are in fact themselves chickens?

Do you see just how stupid that argument is?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Valkie

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16282
Central Coast
Gender: male

Re: Homophobia
Reply #72 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 5:03pm

John Smith wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:25pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:18pm:

Greggy,
I think it's more likely that people who take every opportunity
to defend homosexuals & promote their filthy lifestyles
are in fact homosexuals. i.e. YOU

That argument is ridiculous booby. It would mean that people who defend animal rights, say the use of free range chickens as opposed to battery hens for example, are in fact themselves chickens?

Do you see just how stupid that argument is?

There is absolutely no logic in that argument whaso ever.

People who fight for animal rights, in no way think or consider themselves animals.
They do this becamuse they feel that the animals cannot defend themselved, purely altruistc in intent.

Whereas pooftah defenders do it not through altruism, but do it because they themselves are pooftahs.

Unless of course you believe that pooftahs cannot defend themselves and are animals.

Back to top

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 154407
Gender: male

Re: Homophobia
Reply #73 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 5:05pm

Valkie wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 5:03pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:25pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:18pm:

Greggy,
I think it's more likely that people who take every opportunity
to defend homosexuals & promote their filthy lifestyles
are in fact homosexuals. i.e. YOU

That argument is ridiculous booby. It would mean that people who defend animal rights, say the use of free range chickens as opposed to battery hens for example, are in fact themselves chickens?

Do you see just how stupid that argument is?

There is absolutely no logic in that argument whaso ever.

People who fight for animal rights, in no way think or consider themselves animals.
They do this becamuse they feel that the animals cannot defend themselved, purely altruistc in intent.

Whereas pooftah defenders do it not through altruism, but do it because they themselves are pooftahs.

Unless of course you believe that pooftahs cannot defend themselves and are animals.

"Homophobes should consider a little self-reflection, suggests a new study finding those individuals who are most hostile toward gays and hold strong anti-gay views may themselves have same-sex desires, albeit undercover ones."

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36398
Gender: female

Re: Homophobia
Reply #74 - Sep 9^th, 2017 at 5:06pm

Valkie wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 5:03pm:

John Smith wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:25pm:

Bobby. wrote on Sep 9^th, 2017 at 3:18pm:

Greggy,
I think it's more likely that people who take every opportunity
to defend homosexuals & promote their filthy lifestyles
are in fact homosexuals. i.e. YOU

That argument is ridiculous booby. It would mean that people who defend animal rights, say the use of free range chickens as opposed to battery hens for example, are in fact themselves chickens?

Do you see just how stupid that argument is?

There is absolutely no logic in that argument whaso ever.

People who fight for animal rights, in no way think or consider themselves animals.
They do this becamuse they feel that the animals cannot defend themselved, purely altruistc in intent.

Whereas pooftah defenders do it not through altruism, but do it because they themselves are pooftahs.

Unless of course you believe that pooftahs cannot defend themselves and are animals.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged