Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print
me no speaka da english (Read 12755 times)
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 97576
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #75 - Sep 27th, 2017 at 9:12pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 27th, 2017 at 8:21pm:
This is what you asked Gandalf.

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 6:13pm:
You gobbled it up Gandalf. Do you remember saying "that's exactly what they were"?


Ah, so it went something like this:

FD - gandalf, were they a mindless collective of treacherous jews?
Gandalf - thats exactly what they were

Is that how it went down FD?


The answer was yes. Then you got upset with me because your quote was not exact.


Then you're saying G agreed with your statement.

Can you show how It's not a lie to say that G said this himself?

Cheers.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #76 - Sep 28th, 2017 at 7:53am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 27th, 2017 at 8:21pm:
This is what you asked Gandalf.

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 6:13pm:
You gobbled it up Gandalf. Do you remember saying "that's exactly what they were"?


Ah, so it went something like this:

FD - gandalf, were they a mindless collective of treacherous jews?
Gandalf - thats exactly what they were

Is that how it went down FD?


The answer was yes. Then you got upset with me because your quote was not exact.


By "your quote was not exact" you of course mean I never said the words you shove down my mouth. If you are still confused FD, you can always check again what exactly what my quote "thats exactly what they were" was in response to.

Quote:
Are you arguing that they were a mindless collective and they were treacherous and the were Jews, but this is somehow different from being a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?


My arguments are based on the actual words I used. Feel free to check back on those words instead of constantly second guessing and cleverly twisting my arguments into something racist.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 97576
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #77 - Sep 28th, 2017 at 10:15am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 28th, 2017 at 7:53am:
freediver wrote on Sep 27th, 2017 at 8:21pm:
This is what you asked Gandalf.

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 6:13pm:
You gobbled it up Gandalf. Do you remember saying "that's exactly what they were"?


Ah, so it went something like this:

FD - gandalf, were they a mindless collective of treacherous jews?
Gandalf - thats exactly what they were

Is that how it went down FD?


The answer was yes. Then you got upset with me because your quote was not exact.


By "your quote was not exact" you of course mean I never said the words you shove down my mouth. If you are still confused FD, you can always check again what exactly what my quote "thats exactly what they were" was in response to.

Quote:
Are you arguing that they were a mindless collective and they were treacherous and the were Jews, but this is somehow different from being a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?


My arguments are based on the actual words I used. Feel free to check back on those words instead of constantly second guessing and cleverly twisting my arguments into something racist.


Keep in mind that FD has titled his argument "no speaka da English". He's saying you're pretending not to understand the words he's put in your mouth.

You're saying you never said them, and we all know that. We've all read the posts and their countless subsequent threads.

Do you think this is a tad dishonest?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49836
At my desk.
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #78 - Sep 28th, 2017 at 6:30pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 28th, 2017 at 7:53am:
freediver wrote on Sep 27th, 2017 at 8:21pm:
This is what you asked Gandalf.

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 6:13pm:
You gobbled it up Gandalf. Do you remember saying "that's exactly what they were"?


Ah, so it went something like this:

FD - gandalf, were they a mindless collective of treacherous jews?
Gandalf - thats exactly what they were

Is that how it went down FD?


The answer was yes. Then you got upset with me because your quote was not exact.


By "your quote was not exact" you of course mean I never said the words you shove down my mouth. If you are still confused FD, you can always check again what exactly what my quote "thats exactly what they were" was in response to.

Quote:
Are you arguing that they were a mindless collective and they were treacherous and the were Jews, but this is somehow different from being a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?


My arguments are based on the actual words I used. Feel free to check back on those words instead of constantly second guessing and cleverly twisting my arguments into something racist.


Let's try splitting it into two questions.

Are you arguing that they were a mindless collective and they were treacherous and the were Jews?

Are you arguing that they were not a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?

How is this not based on the actual words you used? Are we only allowed to describe your arguments using direct quotes now?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 97576
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #79 - Sep 28th, 2017 at 8:45pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 28th, 2017 at 6:30pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 28th, 2017 at 7:53am:
freediver wrote on Sep 27th, 2017 at 8:21pm:
This is what you asked Gandalf.

polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 6:13pm:
You gobbled it up Gandalf. Do you remember saying "that's exactly what they were"?


Ah, so it went something like this:

FD - gandalf, were they a mindless collective of treacherous jews?
Gandalf - thats exactly what they were

Is that how it went down FD?


The answer was yes. Then you got upset with me because your quote was not exact.


By "your quote was not exact" you of course mean I never said the words you shove down my mouth. If you are still confused FD, you can always check again what exactly what my quote "thats exactly what they were" was in response to.

Quote:
Are you arguing that they were a mindless collective and they were treacherous and the were Jews, but this is somehow different from being a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?


My arguments are based on the actual words I used. Feel free to check back on those words instead of constantly second guessing and cleverly twisting my arguments into something racist.


Let's try splitting it into two questions.

Are you arguing that they were a mindless collective and they were treacherous and the were Jews?

Are you arguing that they were not a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?

How is this not based on the actual words you used? Are we only allowed to describe your arguments using direct quotes now?


FD, They're the same questions G's just answered. Would you like to give my one question a stab?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #80 - Sep 29th, 2017 at 9:53am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 28th, 2017 at 6:30pm:
Let's try splitting it into two questions.


Its so much easier than that FD - all you have to do is read what I actually say. It really is that simple. And then you'll find at no stage did I utter the phrase "mindless collective of treacherous jews". I even explained to you why I would never say it.

Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 97576
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #81 - Sep 29th, 2017 at 10:19am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 29th, 2017 at 9:53am:
freediver wrote on Sep 28th, 2017 at 6:30pm:
Let's try splitting it into two questions.


Its so much easier than that FD - all you have to do is read what I actually say. It really is that simple. And then you'll find at no stage did I utter the phrase "mindless collective of treacherous jews". I even explained to you why I would never say it.



I doubt FD's going to leave it at that, G. I'm sure he'll find more things you didn't say that you pretend not to understand.

No speaka da English, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49836
At my desk.
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #82 - Sep 30th, 2017 at 7:56am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 29th, 2017 at 9:53am:
freediver wrote on Sep 28th, 2017 at 6:30pm:
Let's try splitting it into two questions.


Its so much easier than that FD - all you have to do is read what I actually say. It really is that simple. And then you'll find at no stage did I utter the phrase "mindless collective of treacherous jews". I even explained to you why I would never say it.



Are you arguing that they were a mindless collective and they were treacherous and the were Jews, but this is somehow different from being a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 97576
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #83 - Sep 30th, 2017 at 9:55pm
 
You see?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #84 - Oct 1st, 2017 at 8:42am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 30th, 2017 at 7:56am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 29th, 2017 at 9:53am:
freediver wrote on Sep 28th, 2017 at 6:30pm:
Let's try splitting it into two questions.


Its so much easier than that FD - all you have to do is read what I actually say. It really is that simple. And then you'll find at no stage did I utter the phrase "mindless collective of treacherous jews". I even explained to you why I would never say it.



Are you arguing that they were a mindless collective and they were treacherous and the were Jews, but this is somehow different from being a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?


Actually FD I never even argued they were jews - in fact I strongly suggested the opposite if you recall. Whatever they may have been nominally, they were first and foremost arabs. Fancy that eh.

Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49836
At my desk.
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #85 - Oct 1st, 2017 at 8:52am
 
Is this you "strongly suggesting" they were not Jews?

polite_gandalf wrote on May 23rd, 2016 at 5:52pm:
Its scheming K - we call them scheming jews.


polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8th, 2013 at 7:38pm:
Also the treachery of the jews had nothing to do with them refusing to help the muslims.
Simple facts FD.


polite_gandalf wrote on May 24th, 2016 at 10:42am:
I went to great lengths to point out their treachery had nothing to do with them being jews.


Are you arguing that they were a mindless collective and they were treacherous and the were Jews, but this is somehow different from being a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #86 - Oct 1st, 2017 at 8:59am
 
look up the word "argument" FD.

Me no speaka da english indeed.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49836
At my desk.
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #87 - Oct 2nd, 2017 at 10:16am
 
On what basis do you object to me describing your argument as "a mindless collective of treacherous Jews"?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 97576
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #88 - Oct 2nd, 2017 at 1:51pm
 
freediver wrote on Oct 2nd, 2017 at 10:16am:
On what basis do you object to me describing your argument as "a mindless collective of treacherous Jews"?


Yes, G, tell FD that.

Is it because It's FD's argument?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: me no speaka da english
Reply #89 - Oct 3rd, 2017 at 2:59pm
 
freediver wrote on Oct 2nd, 2017 at 10:16am:
On what basis do you object to me describing your argument as "a mindless collective of treacherous Jews"?


On the basis that I never 'argued' any such thing.

Have you discovered what the word argue means yet?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 
Send Topic Print