Frank wrote on Sep 4^th, 2017 at 10:27pm:


Again, Burma is not attacking the Muselman. Nor is it converting Christians, anamists, Hindus and all the rest. It has made one ethnic group - the Rohinga - stateless.

Understanding Islam: Buddhist Common Sense vs. Western Nonsense

Ashin Wirathu, a Buddhist monk with a rock-star following in Myanmar, sat before an overflowing crowd of thousands of devotees and launched into a rant against what he called "the enemy"- the country's Muslim minority. "You can be full of kindness and love, but you cannot sleep next to a mad dog," Ashin Wirathu said, referring to Muslims. "I call them troublemakers, because they are troublemakers."

Here is the first lesson: unlike the West, Buddhist monks, despite their reputation as devotees of peace, are still able to accept and respond to reality; are still governed by common sense. Unlike the West, whose sense of reality has been so thoroughly warped by a nonstop media propaganda campaign emanating from ubiquitous TVs and computer screens, conditioning Americans how to think and what to believe, "third world" Buddhist monks are acquainted with reality on the ground. They know that, left unchecked, the Muslim minority living among them-which began hostilities-will grow more aggressive, a historically demonstrative fact.
As in other countries, the Muslims of Myanmar have engaged in violence, jihadi terror, and rape of Buddhist girls. And that's as a minority.

Myanmar's Buddhist are also cognizant that, in neighboring nations like Bangladesh where Muslims are the majority, all non-Muslims are being ruthlessly persecuted into extinction. But even in bordering Thailand, where Buddhists are the majority and Muslims a minority, in the south where Muslims make for large numbers, thousands of Buddhists-men, women, and children-have been slaughtered, beheaded, and raped, as separatist Muslims try to cleanse the region of all "infidel" presence.

Fuller also seems to miss the significance of the fact that there are more Christians and Hindus in Myanmar than Muslims - yet Buddhist hostility only extends to Muslims. If indigenous Buddhists are simply becoming nationalistic radicals, as Fuller suggests, how come they are only attacking Muslims, not Christians, and Hindus?

http://blogs.cbn.com/ibrahim/archive/2013/07/31/understanding-islam-buddhist-com...

Burma is a Buddhist country.  FIOFO. It's FO time for Muslims.

They invade and take over but when they are resisted it's all 'RACISM'. Keep Buddhist Burma Buddhist. Can you respect that?

The way Muslims treat their non-Muslim minorities - who the hell would give Muslims any quarter, anywhere?  Seriously?

Its not really possible to get a clear picture of what is happening, but it looks very similar to the situation in Sri Lanka with the Tamils. A minority resorts to terrorism, and after some very nasty incidents, the country's majority gets pissed off and wades into the minority no holds barred. Then Amnesty International comes in and blames the majority because they winning what the minority started. The typical leftist/humanist/progressive philosophy of supporting the eternal victim.

issuevoter wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 7:13pm:


noone anywhere ever likes muslims

issuevoter wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 7:13pm:


It's nothing like the Tamils, Issue. They occupied the north of Sri Lanka for about 20 years. This was a militarized no-go zone.

The Rohinga have no occupied territory, and now, no land. All land, houses and business owned by Rohinga have been seized by the government. Most Rohinga now live in camps, where they're routinely taken away for "questioning",  and never seen again.

Comparing this to a civil war is surreal.

Karnal wrote on Sep 7^th, 2017 at 7:21pm:


Its very much like the Tamil situation. They allowed their fanatics to start hostilities and lost. And most definitely Amnesty International sides with them, simply because they are a minority.