Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 15
Send Topic Print
Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists. (Read 16778 times)
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21304
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #135 - Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:07pm
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 6:48pm:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:00am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:33am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:03am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:51am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:18am:
its usually pretty hard to upset the buddhists.
there are a lot of other ethnic groups in the area.

what did the rogingya do to incite such animosity?



It's not hard to upset the old boy,  Aquascoot. He has the right to not be offended.

What did the Rohinga do?

They made the Burmese military ban them, kill them and landmine their villages so they can't return. Never ever.

Fair's fair. I'm sure that if the Bangladeshis were killing off their Buddhists, you'd be blaming the refugees too, no?

I blame Islam,  but that's just me.



but( on song sue chi) won the nobel prize for peace.
she seems like a lovely lady. and she's the boss.
buddhist monks arent exactly reknowned for being uncalibrated hot heads.

i sincerely doubt that the rogingya were just minding their own business when on-song and the monks suddenly had a light bulb moment and decided to become "terrorists".

that scenario doesnt pass the sniff test.


Burma's been a military jaunta for over 30 years, Aquascoot. The monks don't run the army. Neither does Aung San Suu Kyi.

The generals would laugh at you if you thought that passed the sniff test.



and yet i have seen many comments about buddhist monks??
why do the military (the defenders of the nation) wish to evict them??


Not many, Aquascoot - one or two monks have been vocal against the Rohinga, that's all.  Referring to the Burmese, the Dali Lama made it clear that Buddhism is not about coming down on people of other faiths. The Dali Lama is not in the Burmese Theravada tradition, but is probably the most revered Buddhist leader in the world.

Monks and Aung Saan Su Kyi have nothing to do with the military, who still run Burma. Remember, oppression is not the way of the superior man. Killing and torturing are not on the "narrow road to success".

The Rohinga are being systematically killed and exiled by the Burmese generals. Call it ethnic cleansing. Sure people fight back - call it resistance.

I have no idea why the generals have declared the Rohinga stateless, and nor does the U.N, the NGOs or ASEAN. The rest of South East Asia is currently taking in the refugees, so tbey're not happy about it.

It's worth noting that, aside from posters on internet forums, no one is blaming Islam. The world is blaming the Burmese generals. Mind you, I have no idea what tbey're thinking inside Burma. The Burmese are still heavily monitored by the secret police there.

And the generals aren't talking.


Tell us all, Karnal, what kicked off the harsh Burmese crackdowns since 2012.

Do you dare say? Will it upset your narrative of rohinga innocence?
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 98966
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #136 - Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:14pm
 
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:07pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 6:48pm:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:00am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:33am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:03am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:51am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:18am:
its usually pretty hard to upset the buddhists.
there are a lot of other ethnic groups in the area.

what did the rogingya do to incite such animosity?



It's not hard to upset the old boy,  Aquascoot. He has the right to not be offended.

What did the Rohinga do?

They made the Burmese military ban them, kill them and landmine their villages so they can't return. Never ever.

Fair's fair. I'm sure that if the Bangladeshis were killing off their Buddhists, you'd be blaming the refugees too, no?

I blame Islam,  but that's just me.



but( on song sue chi) won the nobel prize for peace.
she seems like a lovely lady. and she's the boss.
buddhist monks arent exactly reknowned for being uncalibrated hot heads.

i sincerely doubt that the rogingya were just minding their own business when on-song and the monks suddenly had a light bulb moment and decided to become "terrorists".

that scenario doesnt pass the sniff test.


Burma's been a military jaunta for over 30 years, Aquascoot. The monks don't run the army. Neither does Aung San Suu Kyi.

The generals would laugh at you if you thought that passed the sniff test.



and yet i have seen many comments about buddhist monks??
why do the military (the defenders of the nation) wish to evict them??


Not many, Aquascoot - one or two monks have been vocal against the Rohinga, that's all.  Referring to the Burmese, the Dali Lama made it clear that Buddhism is not about coming down on people of other faiths. The Dali Lama is not in the Burmese Theravada tradition, but is probably the most revered Buddhist leader in the world.

Monks and Aung Saan Su Kyi have nothing to do with the military, who still run Burma. Remember, oppression is not the way of the superior man. Killing and torturing are not on the "narrow road to success".

The Rohinga are being systematically killed and exiled by the Burmese generals. Call it ethnic cleansing. Sure people fight back - call it resistance.

I have no idea why the generals have declared the Rohinga stateless, and nor does the U.N, the NGOs or ASEAN. The rest of South East Asia is currently taking in the refugees, so tbey're not happy about it.

It's worth noting that, aside from posters on internet forums, no one is blaming Islam. The world is blaming the Burmese generals. Mind you, I have no idea what tbey're thinking inside Burma. The Burmese are still heavily monitored by the secret police there.

And the generals aren't talking.


Tell us all, Karnal, what kicked off the harsh Burmese crackdowns since 2012.

Do you dare say? Will it upset your narrative of rohinga innocence?


I don't know. Will you dare say?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21304
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #137 - Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:16pm
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:14pm:
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:07pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 6:48pm:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:00am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:33am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:03am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:51am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:18am:
its usually pretty hard to upset the buddhists.
there are a lot of other ethnic groups in the area.

what did the rogingya do to incite such animosity?



It's not hard to upset the old boy,  Aquascoot. He has the right to not be offended.

What did the Rohinga do?

They made the Burmese military ban them, kill them and landmine their villages so they can't return. Never ever.

Fair's fair. I'm sure that if the Bangladeshis were killing off their Buddhists, you'd be blaming the refugees too, no?

I blame Islam,  but that's just me.



but( on song sue chi) won the nobel prize for peace.
she seems like a lovely lady. and she's the boss.
buddhist monks arent exactly reknowned for being uncalibrated hot heads.

i sincerely doubt that the rogingya were just minding their own business when on-song and the monks suddenly had a light bulb moment and decided to become "terrorists".

that scenario doesnt pass the sniff test.


Burma's been a military jaunta for over 30 years, Aquascoot. The monks don't run the army. Neither does Aung San Suu Kyi.

The generals would laugh at you if you thought that passed the sniff test.



and yet i have seen many comments about buddhist monks??
why do the military (the defenders of the nation) wish to evict them??


Not many, Aquascoot - one or two monks have been vocal against the Rohinga, that's all.  Referring to the Burmese, the Dali Lama made it clear that Buddhism is not about coming down on people of other faiths. The Dali Lama is not in the Burmese Theravada tradition, but is probably the most revered Buddhist leader in the world.

Monks and Aung Saan Su Kyi have nothing to do with the military, who still run Burma. Remember, oppression is not the way of the superior man. Killing and torturing are not on the "narrow road to success".

The Rohinga are being systematically killed and exiled by the Burmese generals. Call it ethnic cleansing. Sure people fight back - call it resistance.

I have no idea why the generals have declared the Rohinga stateless, and nor does the U.N, the NGOs or ASEAN. The rest of South East Asia is currently taking in the refugees, so tbey're not happy about it.

It's worth noting that, aside from posters on internet forums, no one is blaming Islam. The world is blaming the Burmese generals. Mind you, I have no idea what tbey're thinking inside Burma. The Burmese are still heavily monitored by the secret police there.

And the generals aren't talking.


Tell us all, Karnal, what kicked off the harsh Burmese crackdowns since 2012.

Do you dare say? Will it upset your narrative of rohinga innocence?


I don't know. Will you dare say?


How bout this. You Google it, and see if you can post it without breaking your narrative Smiley
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22353
A cat with a view
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #138 - Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:19pm
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 12:00am:

I'd say you've rather exposed yourself here, dear boy.  Your response to a humanitarian crisis where thousands have been killed, hundreds of thousands have flooded into the neighbouring country and the Burmese military is busy setting landmines around Rohinga villages to stop their return is who cares? They're only tinted. Wasting tears on these people is oppressive.

The only humane thing to do is watch them kill each other off and, as always, blame Islam.




The crisis in Myanmar ?

Yes, i blame ISLAM.


Q.
Why do we, in this nation, have, and enjoy peace ?     [...or perhaps that Q. should be expressed in the 'past tense'.]

A.
Our society has enjoyed peace      because      we DID NOT accommodate the followers of ISLAM as compatriots.



Q.
Why do the followers of ISLAM experience conflict ?     [...wherever in the world they are found.]

A.
Because the followers of ISLAM have ISLAM,
and because the followers of ISLAM have the followers of ISLAM      as compatriots.



.




Examples, of what the followers of ISLAM bring......

Within Australia...



Quote:
06 May 2007
Mosque violence Tensions boil over after move to replace imam
Paul Maley
A BITTER factional feud within Canberra's Islamic community has erupted into violence with a leading member being punched repeatedly in the grounds of the mosque at Yarralumla.
Secretary of the ACT Islamic Society Kurt Kennedy said he was set upon shortly after announcing the appointment of a new imam to replace the controversial Mohammed Swaiti.
He was assaulted while waiting on the mosque grounds for a lift home after announcing Mr Swaiti had been dumped and naming the new imam as Yahya Atay.

......"When our secretary Kurt Kennedy announced ... the new imam will deliver the [Friday speech] before prayer, two people jumped up and grabbed Kurt and pushed him around," he told the Canberra Sunday Times.

"They pushed him and wanted to throw him out of the mosque.

"Then the imam [Mr Swaiti] started screaming in the middle of the mosque, 'I am the imam of this mosque! I am the imam who will service you people! I will never step down! No one can force me to step down! I will be here until the day I die!"'
http://canberra.yourguide.com.au/detail.asp?class=news&subclass=general&story_id=582042&category=General



.



Outspoken moslem seeks police protection
[after he received threats,....from moslems]

Quote:
March 22, 2007
One of Australia's most important Muslim leaders has sought police protection after criticising controversial cleric Sheikh Taj al-Din al-Hilali.
Tom Zreika, president of the Lebanese Muslim Association - and Sheikh Hilali's employer -

said he received non-stop phone threats yesterday after he released a document urging greater integration and for Muslims to "mend their ways".

The report, prepared for a national meeting of imams in Sydney this weekend, says some Muslims are "ruining it" for all and that Australians have "had enough" of Muslims.
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/outspoken-muslim-seeks-police-protection/2007/03/21/1174153164032.html


The links are old, but these news articles are kosher.




.




Wherever they go, wherever they are found
                the followers of ISLAM will incessantly claim they are being persecuted and discriminated against by others,
while always attesting to their own virtue as peaceful and tolerant people.



The truth is that the moslem is NOT a peaceful and tolerant person.

I maintain and assert that every moslem, is, by definition, a follower of ISLAM.

The truth is that ALL persons who identify as being the followers of ISLAM, are known as being notoriously unreliable, as deceitful and argumentative people.



The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. Ignorance may deride it. But in the end, there it is.
    - Winston Churchill




.




ONE EXAMPLE.....


MOSLEMS, in Australia.

MOSLEMS, routinely, wasting police time.

MOSLEMS, routinely breaking Australian law, and then falsely, presenting themselves as victims.

MOSLEMS, making false reports to police.

Routinely lying to police [and to other Australians] and intentionally making false accusations attempting to       falsely incriminate       an >> innocent << 3rd party.

Dictionary;
incriminate = = make (someone) appear guilty of a crime or wrongdoing.



e.g.

Sheik Hilaly Caught vandalizing his own Mosque
                 goto 20s,   goto 3m 01s,   goto 4m 01s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9O5KPI4qTI







Another notorious name that comes to mind,          in this 'deceitful', accusatory game,        is Carnita Matthews.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:26pm by Yadda »  

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #139 - Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:45pm
 
Unforgiven wrote on Aug 27th, 2017 at 11:36pm:
It's interesting that nearby Islamic countries Malaysia, Indonesia, and Bangladesh are not offering to take Rohingya Muslims.


Oh FFS  Roll Eyes

Malaysia ready to accept more Rohingya refugees

Quote:
JOHOR BARU: Malaysia is ready to accept more Rohingya refugees following the escalating trouble in the Rakhine state in Myanmar


Quote:
He pointed out that there were more than 56,000 Rohingya already in the country, registered with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).


In total there is estimated around 100 thousand Rohingya asylum seekers in Malaysia - and they are offering to take more.

And lets just ignore the fact that Bangladesh has just accepted around 270 thousand asylum seekers in the last 2 weeks alone.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 22353
A cat with a view
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #140 - Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:50pm
 
Yadda wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:19pm:

The truth is that the moslem is NOT a peaceful and tolerant person.

I maintain and assert that every moslem, is, by definition, a follower of ISLAM.



The truth is that ALL persons who identify as being the followers of ISLAM, are known as being notoriously unreliable, as deceitful and argumentative people.




The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. Ignorance may deride it. But in the end, there it is.
    - Winston Churchill






The followers of ISLAM are encouraged by their religion, to discard their commitment to an agreement, whenever their material interests are no longer served - by the agreement that they entered into.     !!!!!!

The cultural influence upon the follower of ISLAM [upon the psyche of follower of ISLAM] means that any agreement that is entered into by a follower of ISLAM,
can be 'morally' discarded, as soon as taking that course would be to the advantage of the moslem.




EVIDENCE for those claims ?

-------- >

Yadda said....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1295407319/0#0
Quote:

From the Koran, Hadith;

Allah told Mohammed, it is OK to not fulfil the oaths you make.
i.e. If you find something better, you are free to go, and make a better deal, and abandon your first oath.

"Allah indeed has sanctioned for you the expiation of your oaths and Allah is your Protector, and He is the Knowing the Wise."
Koran 66:2

"The Prophet said, "If I take an oath and later find something else better than that, then I do what is better and expiate my oath."."
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #007.067.427
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #008.078.618
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #008.079.709
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #008.079.710
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #008.079.712
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #008.079.715

"expiate my oath", means an obligation to Allah of penance [Kaffara], e.g. fasting for three days, or to clothe or feed poor people.


"If you ever take an oath to do something and later on you find that something else is better, then you should expiate your oath and do what is better."
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #009.089.260
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #009.089.261


"The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: An oath or a vow about something over which a human being has no control, and to disobey Allah, and to break ties of relationship is not binding. If anyone takes an oath and then considers something else better than it, he should give it up, and do what is better, for leaving it is its atonement."
hadithsunnah/abudawud/ #021.3268



"Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar said, "Whoever swears by Allah and then says, 'Allah willing' and then does not do what he has sworn to, has not broken his oath." "
hadithsunnah/muwatta/ #022.22.6.10
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #009.089.260
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #009.089.260
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #009.089.260




Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52854
Gender: male
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #141 - Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:58pm
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 12:00am:
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2017 at 10:17pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 10th, 2017 at 5:45pm:
issuevoter wrote on Sep 10th, 2017 at 3:11pm:
OK so now they want a truce and ceasefire. If you asked them two weeks ago for a truce, they would have praised Allah and shot you. But now they are losing, and it looks like Allah is not quite as concerned about them as the Korans tell them.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41216527


Did you read the words after the headline, Issue? We call this an article.

Trying to turn the Rohinga issue into an Islamist plot is ludicrous. This is ethnic trouble in Burma. Some are predicting the Shan and Karen are next.

Are 'some' predicting that? How concerning.  Tut,tut, 'some', very bad indeed.


I'd say you've rather exposed yourself here, dear boy.  Your response to a humanitarian crisis where thousands have been killed, hundreds of thousands have flooded into the neighbouring country and the Burmese military is busy setting landmines around Rohinga villages to stop their return is who cares? They're only tinted. Wasting tears on these people is oppressive. The only humane thing to do is watch them kill each other off and, as always, blame Islam.

Have I captured your view precisely enough? Let me know if I've missed anything. I'm taking virtue signalling, soft bigotry and all the other cliches you use to objectify the slaughter of men, women and children as on the record.

Feel free to respond with the idiot post.

Tinted barbarians monstering tinted recalcintrants - white man's  burden? Or can we say to them, 'you are equal, you sort yourselves'.  Why is it whitey's fault when tinted people are racist to other tinted people? They are both uncivilised barbarians in their own way. They wanted freedom and recognition. They got it. Now they are smacking and bloodying each other  over in the name of that 'freedom' because to them freedom means fking each other over for the sake of unsettled old scores.

Just dont bring the fvckers here, they are all as bad as each ottter, the primitve bastards.

Can I say that?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 98966
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #142 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 1:14am
 
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:16pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:14pm:
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:07pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 6:48pm:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:00am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:33am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:03am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:51am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:18am:
its usually pretty hard to upset the buddhists.
there are a lot of other ethnic groups in the area.

what did the rogingya do to incite such animosity?



It's not hard to upset the old boy,  Aquascoot. He has the right to not be offended.

What did the Rohinga do?

They made the Burmese military ban them, kill them and landmine their villages so they can't return. Never ever.

Fair's fair. I'm sure that if the Bangladeshis were killing off their Buddhists, you'd be blaming the refugees too, no?

I blame Islam,  but that's just me.



but( on song sue chi) won the nobel prize for peace.
she seems like a lovely lady. and she's the boss.
buddhist monks arent exactly reknowned for being uncalibrated hot heads.

i sincerely doubt that the rogingya were just minding their own business when on-song and the monks suddenly had a light bulb moment and decided to become "terrorists".

that scenario doesnt pass the sniff test.


Burma's been a military jaunta for over 30 years, Aquascoot. The monks don't run the army. Neither does Aung San Suu Kyi.

The generals would laugh at you if you thought that passed the sniff test.



and yet i have seen many comments about buddhist monks??
why do the military (the defenders of the nation) wish to evict them??


Not many, Aquascoot - one or two monks have been vocal against the Rohinga, that's all.  Referring to the Burmese, the Dali Lama made it clear that Buddhism is not about coming down on people of other faiths. The Dali Lama is not in the Burmese Theravada tradition, but is probably the most revered Buddhist leader in the world.

Monks and Aung Saan Su Kyi have nothing to do with the military, who still run Burma. Remember, oppression is not the way of the superior man. Killing and torturing are not on the "narrow road to success".

The Rohinga are being systematically killed and exiled by the Burmese generals. Call it ethnic cleansing. Sure people fight back - call it resistance.

I have no idea why the generals have declared the Rohinga stateless, and nor does the U.N, the NGOs or ASEAN. The rest of South East Asia is currently taking in the refugees, so tbey're not happy about it.

It's worth noting that, aside from posters on internet forums, no one is blaming Islam. The world is blaming the Burmese generals. Mind you, I have no idea what tbey're thinking inside Burma. The Burmese are still heavily monitored by the secret police there.

And the generals aren't talking.


Tell us all, Karnal, what kicked off the harsh Burmese crackdowns since 2012.

Do you dare say? Will it upset your narrative of rohinga innocence?


I don't know. Will you dare say?


How bout this. You Google it, and see if you can post it without breaking your narrative Smiley


Now now, Gordon, if I was tinted, that would be the soft bigotry of low expectations.

Of course I've Googled it. Can you imagine me posting on something without any clue whatsoever? Moi?

Oh, of course you can imagine - you want me to Google it for you.

Sorry, old boy, we'll have to practice soft bigotry on this one.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 98966
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #143 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 1:19am
 
Frank wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:58pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 12:00am:
Frank wrote on Sep 10th, 2017 at 10:17pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 10th, 2017 at 5:45pm:
issuevoter wrote on Sep 10th, 2017 at 3:11pm:
OK so now they want a truce and ceasefire. If you asked them two weeks ago for a truce, they would have praised Allah and shot you. But now they are losing, and it looks like Allah is not quite as concerned about them as the Korans tell them.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41216527


Did you read the words after the headline, Issue? We call this an article.

Trying to turn the Rohinga issue into an Islamist plot is ludicrous. This is ethnic trouble in Burma. Some are predicting the Shan and Karen are next.

Are 'some' predicting that? How concerning.  Tut,tut, 'some', very bad indeed.


I'd say you've rather exposed yourself here, dear boy.  Your response to a humanitarian crisis where thousands have been killed, hundreds of thousands have flooded into the neighbouring country and the Burmese military is busy setting landmines around Rohinga villages to stop their return is who cares? They're only tinted. Wasting tears on these people is oppressive. The only humane thing to do is watch them kill each other off and, as always, blame Islam.

Have I captured your view precisely enough? Let me know if I've missed anything. I'm taking virtue signalling, soft bigotry and all the other cliches you use to objectify the slaughter of men, women and children as on the record.

Feel free to respond with the idiot post.

Tinted barbarians monstering tinted recalcintrants - white man's  burden? Or can we say to them, 'you are equal, you sort yourselves'.  Why is it whitey's fault when tinted people are racist to other tinted people?


Sorry, old chap, I must have missed something. Who said it was whitey's fault?

Feeling guilty about something? Would you like to share?

Feel free to free associate. Get it off your chest, you'll feel better.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36233
Gender: female
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #144 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 2:35am
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 1:14am:
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:16pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:14pm:
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:07pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 6:48pm:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:00am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:33am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:03am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:51am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:18am:
its usually pretty hard to upset the buddhists.
there are a lot of other ethnic groups in the area.

what did the rogingya do to incite such animosity?



It's not hard to upset the old boy,  Aquascoot. He has the right to not be offended.

What did the Rohinga do?

They made the Burmese military ban them, kill them and landmine their villages so they can't return. Never ever.

Fair's fair. I'm sure that if the Bangladeshis were killing off their Buddhists, you'd be blaming the refugees too, no?

I blame Islam,  but that's just me.



but( on song sue chi) won the nobel prize for peace.
she seems like a lovely lady. and she's the boss.
buddhist monks arent exactly reknowned for being uncalibrated hot heads.

i sincerely doubt that the rogingya were just minding their own business when on-song and the monks suddenly had a light bulb moment and decided to become "terrorists".

that scenario doesnt pass the sniff test.


Burma's been a military jaunta for over 30 years, Aquascoot. The monks don't run the army. Neither does Aung San Suu Kyi.

The generals would laugh at you if you thought that passed the sniff test.



and yet i have seen many comments about buddhist monks??
why do the military (the defenders of the nation) wish to evict them??


Not many, Aquascoot - one or two monks have been vocal against the Rohinga, that's all.  Referring to the Burmese, the Dali Lama made it clear that Buddhism is not about coming down on people of other faiths. The Dali Lama is not in the Burmese Theravada tradition, but is probably the most revered Buddhist leader in the world.

Monks and Aung Saan Su Kyi have nothing to do with the military, who still run Burma. Remember, oppression is not the way of the superior man. Killing and torturing are not on the "narrow road to success".

The Rohinga are being systematically killed and exiled by the Burmese generals. Call it ethnic cleansing. Sure people fight back - call it resistance.

I have no idea why the generals have declared the Rohinga stateless, and nor does the U.N, the NGOs or ASEAN. The rest of South East Asia is currently taking in the refugees, so tbey're not happy about it.

It's worth noting that, aside from posters on internet forums, no one is blaming Islam. The world is blaming the Burmese generals. Mind you, I have no idea what tbey're thinking inside Burma. The Burmese are still heavily monitored by the secret police there.

And the generals aren't talking.


Tell us all, Karnal, what kicked off the harsh Burmese crackdowns since 2012.

Do you dare say? Will it upset your narrative of rohinga innocence?


I don't know. Will you dare say?


How bout this. You Google it, and see if you can post it without breaking your narrative Smiley


Now now, Gordon, if I was tinted, that would be the soft bigotry of low expectations.

Of course I've Googled it. Can you imagine me posting on something without any clue whatsoever? Moi?

Oh, of course you can imagine - you want me to Google it for you.

Sorry, old boy, we'll have to practice soft bigotry on this one.


Oh stop your virtue signalling for crying out loud.

The simple facts of the matter are that Gordy saw Muslims working in shops in Myanmar. How could anyone possibly be being oppressed while "they" are working happily in shops?

You don't know, Karnal. You've never been there.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 98966
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #145 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:22am
 
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 2:35am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 1:14am:
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:16pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:14pm:
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:07pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 6:48pm:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:00am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:33am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:03am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:51am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:18am:
its usually pretty hard to upset the buddhists.
there are a lot of other ethnic groups in the area.

what did the rogingya do to incite such animosity?



It's not hard to upset the old boy,  Aquascoot. He has the right to not be offended.

What did the Rohinga do?

They made the Burmese military ban them, kill them and landmine their villages so they can't return. Never ever.

Fair's fair. I'm sure that if the Bangladeshis were killing off their Buddhists, you'd be blaming the refugees too, no?

I blame Islam,  but that's just me.



but( on song sue chi) won the nobel prize for peace.
she seems like a lovely lady. and she's the boss.
buddhist monks arent exactly reknowned for being uncalibrated hot heads.

i sincerely doubt that the rogingya were just minding their own business when on-song and the monks suddenly had a light bulb moment and decided to become "terrorists".

that scenario doesnt pass the sniff test.


Burma's been a military jaunta for over 30 years, Aquascoot. The monks don't run the army. Neither does Aung San Suu Kyi.

The generals would laugh at you if you thought that passed the sniff test.



and yet i have seen many comments about buddhist monks??
why do the military (the defenders of the nation) wish to evict them??


Not many, Aquascoot - one or two monks have been vocal against the Rohinga, that's all.  Referring to the Burmese, the Dali Lama made it clear that Buddhism is not about coming down on people of other faiths. The Dali Lama is not in the Burmese Theravada tradition, but is probably the most revered Buddhist leader in the world.

Monks and Aung Saan Su Kyi have nothing to do with the military, who still run Burma. Remember, oppression is not the way of the superior man. Killing and torturing are not on the "narrow road to success".

The Rohinga are being systematically killed and exiled by the Burmese generals. Call it ethnic cleansing. Sure people fight back - call it resistance.

I have no idea why the generals have declared the Rohinga stateless, and nor does the U.N, the NGOs or ASEAN. The rest of South East Asia is currently taking in the refugees, so tbey're not happy about it.

It's worth noting that, aside from posters on internet forums, no one is blaming Islam. The world is blaming the Burmese generals. Mind you, I have no idea what tbey're thinking inside Burma. The Burmese are still heavily monitored by the secret police there.

And the generals aren't talking.


Tell us all, Karnal, what kicked off the harsh Burmese crackdowns since 2012.

Do you dare say? Will it upset your narrative of rohinga innocence?


I don't know. Will you dare say?


How bout this. You Google it, and see if you can post it without breaking your narrative Smiley


Now now, Gordon, if I was tinted, that would be the soft bigotry of low expectations.

Of course I've Googled it. Can you imagine me posting on something without any clue whatsoever? Moi?

Oh, of course you can imagine - you want me to Google it for you.

Sorry, old boy, we'll have to practice soft bigotry on this one.


Oh stop your virtue signalling for crying out loud.

The simple facts of the matter are that Gordy saw Muslims working in shops in Myanmar. How could anyone possibly be being oppressed while "they" are working happily in shops?

You don't know, Karnal. You've never been there.


Excuse me, Mother, Gordon only said he had the chicken biryani. He never did say whether it was cooked by a towel head.

The UN's just declared the situation in Burma as a genocide. Ridiculous, I know.

How many of them have been to Bagan?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 53070
Gender: male
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #146 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:29am
 
Isn't Genocide 'total extermination'?
Seems the Burmese are just kicking them out - no?

Sadly, when the 'Borders' of the world were created - it was a hurried job. Many peoples had a line drawn right down the middle of their home.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36233
Gender: female
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #147 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:39am
 
Karnal wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:22am:
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 2:35am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 1:14am:
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:16pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:14pm:
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:07pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 6:48pm:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:00am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:33am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:03am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:51am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:18am:
its usually pretty hard to upset the buddhists.
there are a lot of other ethnic groups in the area.

what did the rogingya do to incite such animosity?



It's not hard to upset the old boy,  Aquascoot. He has the right to not be offended.

What did the Rohinga do?

They made the Burmese military ban them, kill them and landmine their villages so they can't return. Never ever.

Fair's fair. I'm sure that if the Bangladeshis were killing off their Buddhists, you'd be blaming the refugees too, no?

I blame Islam,  but that's just me.



but( on song sue chi) won the nobel prize for peace.
she seems like a lovely lady. and she's the boss.
buddhist monks arent exactly reknowned for being uncalibrated hot heads.

i sincerely doubt that the rogingya were just minding their own business when on-song and the monks suddenly had a light bulb moment and decided to become "terrorists".

that scenario doesnt pass the sniff test.


Burma's been a military jaunta for over 30 years, Aquascoot. The monks don't run the army. Neither does Aung San Suu Kyi.

The generals would laugh at you if you thought that passed the sniff test.



and yet i have seen many comments about buddhist monks??
why do the military (the defenders of the nation) wish to evict them??


Not many, Aquascoot - one or two monks have been vocal against the Rohinga, that's all.  Referring to the Burmese, the Dali Lama made it clear that Buddhism is not about coming down on people of other faiths. The Dali Lama is not in the Burmese Theravada tradition, but is probably the most revered Buddhist leader in the world.

Monks and Aung Saan Su Kyi have nothing to do with the military, who still run Burma. Remember, oppression is not the way of the superior man. Killing and torturing are not on the "narrow road to success".

The Rohinga are being systematically killed and exiled by the Burmese generals. Call it ethnic cleansing. Sure people fight back - call it resistance.

I have no idea why the generals have declared the Rohinga stateless, and nor does the U.N, the NGOs or ASEAN. The rest of South East Asia is currently taking in the refugees, so tbey're not happy about it.

It's worth noting that, aside from posters on internet forums, no one is blaming Islam. The world is blaming the Burmese generals. Mind you, I have no idea what tbey're thinking inside Burma. The Burmese are still heavily monitored by the secret police there.

And the generals aren't talking.


Tell us all, Karnal, what kicked off the harsh Burmese crackdowns since 2012.

Do you dare say? Will it upset your narrative of rohinga innocence?


I don't know. Will you dare say?


How bout this. You Google it, and see if you can post it without breaking your narrative Smiley


Now now, Gordon, if I was tinted, that would be the soft bigotry of low expectations.

Of course I've Googled it. Can you imagine me posting on something without any clue whatsoever? Moi?

Oh, of course you can imagine - you want me to Google it for you.

Sorry, old boy, we'll have to practice soft bigotry on this one.


Oh stop your virtue signalling for crying out loud.

The simple facts of the matter are that Gordy saw Muslims working in shops in Myanmar. How could anyone possibly be being oppressed while "they" are working happily in shops?

You don't know, Karnal. You've never been there.


Excuse me, Mother, Gordon only said he had the chicken biryani. He never did say whether it was cooked by a towel head.

The UN's just declared the situation in Burma as a genocide. Ridiculous, I know.

How many of them have been to Bagan?


So easy to say from the comfort of your leafy enclave,

Gordy showed me a photo and stuff. Of a bona fide Muslim in a shop in Myanmar. His hat was presented as evidence.

Therefore he knows more than you. Capiche?

Just being somewhere, irrespective of how much you understand your surroundings, means you win. I, for example, know everything about my whiter than white bread esplanade. Fully versed on how everyone feels and how they have always felt.

I've talked to people in shops.


Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 98966
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #148 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 9:27am
 
Jasin wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:29am:
Isn't Genocide 'total extermination'?
Seems the Burmese are just kicking them out - no?

Sadly, when the 'Borders' of the world were created - it was a hurried job. Many peoples had a line drawn right down the middle of their home.


So the generals up and changed the borders.

Cunning, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 98966
Re: Rogingya terrorism against Buddhists.
Reply #149 - Sep 12th, 2017 at 9:30am
 
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:39am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 4:22am:
mothra wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 2:35am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 12th, 2017 at 1:14am:
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:16pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:14pm:
Gordon wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:07pm:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 6:48pm:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 9:00am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:33am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 8:03am:
Karnal wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:51am:
aquascoot wrote on Sep 11th, 2017 at 7:18am:
its usually pretty hard to upset the buddhists.
there are a lot of other ethnic groups in the area.

what did the rogingya do to incite such animosity?



It's not hard to upset the old boy,  Aquascoot. He has the right to not be offended.

What did the Rohinga do?

They made the Burmese military ban them, kill them and landmine their villages so they can't return. Never ever.

Fair's fair. I'm sure that if the Bangladeshis were killing off their Buddhists, you'd be blaming the refugees too, no?

I blame Islam,  but that's just me.



but( on song sue chi) won the nobel prize for peace.
she seems like a lovely lady. and she's the boss.
buddhist monks arent exactly reknowned for being uncalibrated hot heads.

i sincerely doubt that the rogingya were just minding their own business when on-song and the monks suddenly had a light bulb moment and decided to become "terrorists".

that scenario doesnt pass the sniff test.


Burma's been a military jaunta for over 30 years, Aquascoot. The monks don't run the army. Neither does Aung San Suu Kyi.

The generals would laugh at you if you thought that passed the sniff test.



and yet i have seen many comments about buddhist monks??
why do the military (the defenders of the nation) wish to evict them??


Not many, Aquascoot - one or two monks have been vocal against the Rohinga, that's all.  Referring to the Burmese, the Dali Lama made it clear that Buddhism is not about coming down on people of other faiths. The Dali Lama is not in the Burmese Theravada tradition, but is probably the most revered Buddhist leader in the world.

Monks and Aung Saan Su Kyi have nothing to do with the military, who still run Burma. Remember, oppression is not the way of the superior man. Killing and torturing are not on the "narrow road to success".

The Rohinga are being systematically killed and exiled by the Burmese generals. Call it ethnic cleansing. Sure people fight back - call it resistance.

I have no idea why the generals have declared the Rohinga stateless, and nor does the U.N, the NGOs or ASEAN. The rest of South East Asia is currently taking in the refugees, so tbey're not happy about it.

It's worth noting that, aside from posters on internet forums, no one is blaming Islam. The world is blaming the Burmese generals. Mind you, I have no idea what tbey're thinking inside Burma. The Burmese are still heavily monitored by the secret police there.

And the generals aren't talking.


Tell us all, Karnal, what kicked off the harsh Burmese crackdowns since 2012.

Do you dare say? Will it upset your narrative of rohinga innocence?


I don't know. Will you dare say?


How bout this. You Google it, and see if you can post it without breaking your narrative Smiley


Now now, Gordon, if I was tinted, that would be the soft bigotry of low expectations.

Of course I've Googled it. Can you imagine me posting on something without any clue whatsoever? Moi?

Oh, of course you can imagine - you want me to Google it for you.

Sorry, old boy, we'll have to practice soft bigotry on this one.


Oh stop your virtue signalling for crying out loud.

The simple facts of the matter are that Gordy saw Muslims working in shops in Myanmar. How could anyone possibly be being oppressed while "they" are working happily in shops?

You don't know, Karnal. You've never been there.


Excuse me, Mother, Gordon only said he had the chicken biryani. He never did say whether it was cooked by a towel head.

The UN's just declared the situation in Burma as a genocide. Ridiculous, I know.

How many of them have been to Bagan?


So easy to say from the comfort of your leafy enclave,

Gordy showed me a photo and stuff. Of a bona fide Muslim in a shop in Myanmar. His hat was presented as evidence.

Therefore he knows more than you. Capiche?

Just being somewhere, irrespective of how much you understand your surroundings, means you win. I, for example, know everything about my whiter than white bread esplanade. Fully versed on how everyone feels and how they have always felt.

I've talked to people in shops.




Yes, but why would Buddhist monks be committing genocide if the Muselman didn't start it first?

Tell me that.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 15
Send Topic Print