Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 8:03pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 13^th, 2017 at 8:03pm:


We do tolerate your disapproval of SSM, Homo.

Nobody has ever suggested banning you from having those outdated opinions.

cods wrote on Jul 14^th, 2017 at 2:57pm:



Okay, I'm at a loss.

Does anyone know why I'm the one being attacked here?

Anyone?

I can see I'm going to have to explain this to cods like she's a 5 year old.

Okay then, here goes.

Cods, the Islamophobes among us quite regularly say that Muslim face coverings should be banned because they are a security threat ("we don't know who's under there").

So, using that logic, any face covering is a security threat - not just those associated with Islam.

If it covers up the face, and we don't know who's behind the veil/mask/makeup/helmet/mascot head/etc., it's a potential security risk.

Now, before you go off all half-cocked again, listen to this bit very carefully.

I do NOT want people wearing surgical face masks (victims of horrendous burns) to be told that they cannot walk around in public with those masks on.

The same goes for people with helmets, Halloween masks, excessive makeup, or religious face coverings (no matter what religion they belong to).

However, the Islmophobes among us only single out Islamic face coverings when it comes to "security threats".

Why is that, cods?

Think about it.

The next time you see someone wearing a surgical face mask, how do you know for sure that the person underneath is a burns victim?

How do you know they're not a terrorist/bank robber/kiddy fiddler/whatever?

Are you starting to understand now, cods?

I really hope so.

And, one more time, just so you are absolutely clear: I do NOT want people wearing surgical face masks (victims of horrendous burns) to be told that they cannot walk around in public with those masks on.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 14^th, 2017 at 11:31am:



EVEN you know you are an idiot, Turdy - you make the point about 'why should i do it if they don't' (as if it was about imitating others) but then realise just how stupid you were and say something about norms - which is the point.


Why should I submit to stupid and anachronistic Islamic norms of dress and behaviour when they  express refuse to live and dress by Australian norms?
Why do I have to submit to them if they refuse to live by the norms of the country they CHOSE to live in.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 14^th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

Because you are arguing, once again, for the 'mindless, stupid arse'ole' side in the debate.

Karnal wrote on Jul 15^th, 2017 at 12:04am:

You just keep rubbin' yer little feller in the corner there, Kameel, and singing 'ten rupee gimme' and mebbe someone will one day.  You carry on hoping, boy.

Frank wrote on Jul 15^th, 2017 at 12:33am:


The old boy is free to whinge because we invited him here and gave him the right to be offended. He's the most hypocritical, stupid and mendacious old fool here, and that's saying something.

But we wouldn't have it any other way.