Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 
Send Topic Print
Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ... (Read 14343 times)
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19619
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #240 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




16 pages of gweggylikesbuggery defending these armed robbers.

It was self defence, case closed.
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 145602
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #241 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm
 
BigOl64 wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:08pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:00pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 5:59pm:
But not for our residence numpties, greeg and the unfocused, they watch a blurry video and they know to an absolute certainty what went on.


What evidence do you have to support your claim that they were burglars?

I'm (very) curious.



What's was that BigHole?  I didn't hear you.

What evidence do you have to support your claim that they were burglars?



If you are not going to answer my questions why the fkk would think I would answer yours fkkhead?


Fkk you're too stupid to even understand what the word valid means, you are fkking joke. 


What evidence do you have to support your claim that they were burglars?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 145602
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #242 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:37pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




defending these armed robbers.




What evidence do you have to support your claim that they were robbers?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19619
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #243 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:44pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




16 pages of gweggylikesbuggery defending these armed robbers.

It was self defence, case closed.



16 pages of idiotic trolling from gweggylikesbuggery, it's amusing how he has frittered away days posting in this thread it's clear the tool doesn't have a job or a life.
Grin Grin Grin Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Alinta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1470
Melbourne
Gender: female
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #244 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:45pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




16 pages of gweggylikesbuggery defending these armed robbers.

It was self defence, case closed.


I'm certainly not defending anyone.
My view is that police writing it off as self defence at this stage is premature.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #245 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:46pm
 
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:45pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




16 pages of gweggylikesbuggery defending these armed robbers.

It was self defence, case closed.


I'm certainly not defending anyone.
My view is that police writing it off as self defence at this stage is premature.
The situation is clear cut as is Californian law.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BigOl64
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #246 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:47pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:08pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:00pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 5:59pm:
But not for our residence numpties, greeg and the unfocused, they watch a blurry video and they know to an absolute certainty what went on.


What evidence do you have to support your claim that they were burglars?

I'm (very) curious.



What's was that BigHole?  I didn't hear you.

What evidence do you have to support your claim that they were burglars?



If you are not going to answer my questions why the fkk would think I would answer yours fkkhead?


Fkk you're too stupid to even understand what the word valid means, you are fkking joke. 


What evidence do you have to support your claim that they were burglars?




What evidence you have they were shot in the back?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19619
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #247 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:50pm
 
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:45pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




16 pages of gweggylikesbuggery defending these armed robbers.

It was self defence, case closed.


I'm certainly not defending anyone.
My view is that police writing it off as self defence at this stage is premature.


That's the way it is in the USA, if you're armed and trespassing the homeowner can shoot you.

The only thing that concerns me is the guy must have had a pea shooter, if he had a .357 magnum they would have been picking up dead bodies from his garage floor.
Perhaps he should get a bigger gun.

Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Alinta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1470
Melbourne
Gender: female
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #248 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:54pm
 
rhino wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:46pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:45pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




16 pages of gweggylikesbuggery defending these armed robbers.

It was self defence, case closed.


I'm certainly not defending anyone.
My view is that police writing it off as self defence at this stage is premature.
The situation is clear cut as is Californian law.


Tell me more Rhino, as my only interest in this topic is law related.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #249 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:57pm
 
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:54pm:
rhino wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:46pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:45pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




16 pages of gweggylikesbuggery defending these armed robbers.

It was self defence, case closed.


I'm certainly not defending anyone.
My view is that police writing it off as self defence at this stage is premature.
The situation is clear cut as is Californian law.


Tell me more Rhino, as my only interest in this topic is law related.
https://www.wklaw.com/california-self-defense-laws/
Quote:
California’s “Castle Doctrine” (PC Section 198.5)
Although California does not specifically have a “stand-your-ground” law, the Castle Doctrine is similar. Under Penal Code Section 198.5, you are allowed to use deadly force within your own home if you have a “reasonable fear of imminent peril or great bodily injury.”

If someone forces his or her way into your home unlawfully, a few things must occur to justify using deadly force:

You knew or had reason to believe the person entered your home unlawfully;
The intruder was acting unlawfully (not a police officer who was doing their job);
There was a reasonable fear of death or injury to you, a family member or another member of the household; and
You or the occupants of your home did not provoke the intruder in any way.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 145602
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #250 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 7:01pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:50pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:45pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




16 pages of gweggylikesbuggery defending these armed robbers.

It was self defence, case closed.


I'm certainly not defending anyone.
My view is that police writing it off as self defence at this stage is premature.


That's the way it is in the USA, if you're armed and trespassing the homeowner can shoot you.



Were they trespassing?

If so, where's your evidence?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 145602
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #251 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 7:01pm
 
BigOl64 wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:47pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:08pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:00pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 5:59pm:
But not for our residence numpties, greeg and the unfocused, they watch a blurry video and they know to an absolute certainty what went on.


What evidence do you have to support your claim that they were burglars?

I'm (very) curious.



What's was that BigHole?  I didn't hear you.

What evidence do you have to support your claim that they were burglars?



If you are not going to answer my questions why the fkk would think I would answer yours fkkhead?


Fkk you're too stupid to even understand what the word valid means, you are fkking joke. 


What evidence do you have to support your claim that they were burglars?




What evidence you have they were shot in the back?




What evidence do you have to support your claim that they were burglars?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 145602
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #252 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 7:03pm
 
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:45pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




16 pages of gweggylikesbuggery defending these armed robbers.

It was self defence, case closed.


I'm certainly not defending anyone.
My view is that police writing it off as self defence at this stage is premature.


Indeed.

Investigations are continuing, though.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19619
Gender: male
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #253 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 7:13pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 7:01pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:50pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:45pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




16 pages of gweggylikesbuggery defending these armed robbers.

It was self defence, case closed.


I'm certainly not defending anyone.
My view is that police writing it off as self defence at this stage is premature.


That's the way it is in the USA, if you're armed and trespassing the homeowner can shoot you.



Were they trespassing?

If so, where's your evidence?



Nobody cares what you think little pecca, the police have investigated they said it was a case of self defence so case closed.

No amount of whining from a delusional person like you is going to make the police change their mind.
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Alinta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1470
Melbourne
Gender: female
Re: Shoots and kills two would-be burglars ...
Reply #254 - Jun 28th, 2017 at 7:16pm
 
rhino wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:57pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:54pm:
rhino wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:46pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:45pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:36pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:24pm:
Alinta wrote on Jun 28th, 2017 at 6:22pm:



Thanks for that.




16 pages of gweggylikesbuggery defending these armed robbers.

It was self defence, case closed.


I'm certainly not defending anyone.
My view is that police writing it off as self defence at this stage is premature.
The situation is clear cut as is Californian law.


Tell me more Rhino, as my only interest in this topic is law related.
https://www.wklaw.com/california-self-defense-laws/
Quote:
California’s “Castle Doctrine” (PC Section 198.5)
Although California does not specifically have a “stand-your-ground” law, the Castle Doctrine is similar. Under Penal Code Section 198.5, you are allowed to use deadly force within your own home if you have a “reasonable fear of imminent peril or great bodily injury.”

If someone forces his or her way into your home unlawfully, a few things must occur to justify using deadly force:

You knew or had reason to believe the person entered your home unlawfully;
The intruder was acting unlawfully (not a police officer who was doing their job);
There was a reasonable fear of death or injury to you, a family member or another member of the household; and
You or the occupants of your home did not provoke the intruder in any way.


The part I've highlighted is the sticking point for me.

Forensic/autopsy evidence to prove where the fatal shots were fired, to me, is critical to self defence. If inside the garage, I understand the owner reacted to an imminent threat of peril and great injury and I take no issue with self defence at that stage.

However, the imminent threat had passed once the intruders ran off and I'm far from persuaded the shots fired at that stage accord with self defence.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 
Send Topic Print