implicate
verb
past tense: implicated; past participle: implicated
ˈɪmplɪkeɪt/Submit
1.
show (someone) to be involved in a crime.
"he implicated his government in the murders of three judges"
synonyms:      incriminate, compromise; More
2.
convey (a meaning) indirectly through what one says, rather than stating it explicitly.
"by saying that coffee would keep her awake, Mary implicated that she didn't want any"



http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/flashbackjohn-podesta-im-definitely-maki...

FLASHBACK=>John Podesta: ‘I’m Definitely For Making an Example of a Suspected Leaker’

Cristina Laila May 16th, 2017 11:43 am 66 Comments

On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.

The (Rich) family hired Rod Wheeler to investigate their son’s murder. Wheeler told FOX 5 DC on Monday there is tangible evidence on Rich’s laptop that confirms he was communicating with WikiLeaks prior to his death.

A flashback to an email chain extracted from the ‘Podesta emails’ via Wikileaks in February of 2015, shows just how paranoid the Clinton campaign was about leaks to the press. John Podesta said in an email that he’s ‘definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have a real basis for it’ and that there are ‘stiff consequences for leaking’.




Excerpt from email chain between John Podesta and Joel Benson via Wikileaks:

I agree–when we have press staff, this will be MUCH easier. And I would love an example being made. On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:12 PM,

John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote: > Agree. Happy to talk to the David’s. Call me crazy, but I think if we can > survive the next month, it will be possible, maybe even straightforward to > get our arms around this once there is an actual campaign. I’m definitely > for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real > basis for it. > > JP > –Sent from my iPad– > john.podesta@gmail.com > For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com > > On Feb 22, 2015, at 5:56 PM,

Joel Benenson <jbenenson@bsgco.com> wrote: > > John, > > We are in massive agreement that we need a strategy and process now to > enable and disable as you say and I think this is worth spending some time > making it practicable. I would strongly recommend either one of you or > both talking with Plouffe about he and Axe created that culture from the > start in 07.

> > > Here are some thoughts but I realize this topic will take a dedicated > conversation to figure out what will work.

> > > > I do believe that this starts with alignment on our campaign culture and a > paradigm shift in the old Clinton M.O. I know HRC believes the more > people you talk to the better but it simply isn’t. Especially for her. We > really need to tighten who she talks to and make sure that Huma/schedulers > route most people through high level folks on the campaign so that they are > being listened to.

> > > I think Robby rightly says that a lot of our leaks are coming through job > searches we’re doing. I think every conversation has to either begin or > end by telling people if you’re name appears in print as a result of the > conversations the job is off the table.

> > > > I think we have to make examples now of people who have violated the trust > of HRC and the rest of the team. People going forward need to know there > are stiff consequences for leaking, self-promotion, unauthorized talking > with the press. No one – literally no one talked to the press in either > Obama campaign without clearing it with campaign brass.


FLASHBACK=>John Podesta: ‘I’m Definitely For Making an Example of a Suspected Leaker’

Cristina Laila May 16th, 2017 11:43 am 66 Comments

On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.

The (Rich) family hired Rod Wheeler to investigate their son’s murder. Wheeler told FOX 5 DC on Monday there is tangible evidence on Rich’s laptop that confirms he was communicating with WikiLeaks prior to his death.

A flashback to an email chain extracted from the ‘Podesta emails’ via Wikileaks in February of 2015, shows just how paranoid the Clinton campaign was about leaks to the press. John Podesta said in an email that he’s ‘definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have a real basis for it’ and that there are ‘stiff consequences for leaking’.


Excerpt from email chain between John Podesta and Joel Benson via Wikileaks:

I agree–when we have press staff, this will be MUCH easier. And I would love an example being made. On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:12 PM,

John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote: > Agree. Happy to talk to the David’s. Call me crazy, but I think if we can > survive the next month, it will be possible, maybe even straightforward to > get our arms around this once there is an actual campaign. I’m definitely > for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real > basis for it. > > JP > –Sent from my iPad– > john.podesta@gmail.com > For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com > > On Feb 22, 2015, at 5:56 PM,

Joel Benenson <j