Australian Politics Forum - RIP Seperation of Church and State

Panther

Gold Member

Offline

My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11912
Gender: male

Re: RIP Seperation of Church and State
Reply #15 - May 12^th, 2017 at 8:37pm

longweekend58 wrote on May 12^th, 2017 at 12:24pm:

Panther wrote on May 12^th, 2017 at 11:44am:

AiA wrote on May 11^th, 2017 at 11:58pm:

Panther wrote on May 11^th, 2017 at 11:51pm:

AiA wrote on May 11^th, 2017 at 11:18pm:

It has been addressed by Congress.

Really....I thought that The Constitution is the Law of the Land.....All law must have it's "roots" in, & be compliant with, the US Constitution as written or defined by the Supreme Court in their decisions.

Congress is only one (1) part of the 3 independent parts of government.

But, if Congress has addressed it, specifically how....in what....where?

https://i.imgsafe.org/b9e0347.gif

\

Hard to believe that in 2017 someone would not know how to do a search using Google ... the law Congress passed does have its "roots" in the Constitution, if it didn't, it wouldn't be law, would it? Trump has fallen under the influence of scum like Paula White, a fraudulent minister who lives a luxury lifestyle while filing for bankruptcy.

So what, unless you are into promoting the progressive left's "Class Warfare" mantra aka Envy of the Successful.

Many millionaires & billionaires file for bankruptcy in their failing/faltering businesses (those worth saving), which doesn't incorporate their 'personal' holdings...they are separate under bankruptcy law... & that is all I'll say about that.....

➣ Any law that passes becomes law if it passes via the process, it only becomes unconstitutional when suit is filed, & then the Supreme Court decides it's worthy of it's attention (they pick & chose amongst the many who apply....they aren't required to listen to any they don't want to)....when the Supreme Court decides to listen to the case, & it comes to a decision, only then is it truly for or against....constitutional or unconstitutional.....& until that time the findings of lower court decision(s)..if any..will stand.

A handful of lower courts could find a law constitutional, but if taken up by the Supreme Court at a later date, & the Supreme Court decides the exact same law unconstitutional....well all the lower courts decisions are vacated, & the law is struck as unconstitutional.

The same thing could happen if a present day Supreme Court picks up a decision made by a previous SCOTUS, & upon it's reflection decides to overturn the previous SC decision based on it's own findings.....it's overturned....fin-eee-tow!

An example might very well be the 1970's Roe v. Wade decision somewhere down the line..... a present day court could overturn that decision if it wished, & all the howling would accomplish nothing.....it would either be wait for a more sympathetic court in the distant future to overturn, or an Amendment could be brought & passed changing the Constitution itself.

We may very well be seeing something similar in this topics Church & State case, in the near future, that is, if the Supreme Court in it's infinite wisdom http://onesmiley.site11.com/smileys/chuckle002.gif wants to hear it.

your endless pro-SCOTUS masturbation is tiresome. none of your waffle address the OP in any form.

Good, because I wasn't addressing the OP, I was responding a direct question posed to me by AiA in the previous post....but if you knew how to read you would have known that.....but being a TROLL you don't bother reading, or adding to the discussion......you just go about being the ignorant TROLLING Twat you are....... & if you don't like my "pro-SCOTUS masturbation" then stop grabbing at my waist begging like an Oliver Twist for a mouthful of seconds!!