Australian Politics Forum - Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #465 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:22am

Setanta wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 8:00am:

mothra wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 7:48am:

You can all argue all you like over who hit who and who had what coming.

Hell, you can even pull a Rhino and demand that only one definition from dictionary is valid, despite it listing more than that.

Go for it people. Explain away how she had a king hit coming to her. Did i say say king hit? Explain away how she had a punch in the head coming to her.

Talk about her past, while you're at it. All of the thing that she has done to make her her a less than "reputable" woman.

We won't mention the bio of the guy that punched her in the head. How he is a neo-Nazi and white supremacist who was less than honourably discharged from the marines after less than two weeks.

No. He' just reacting, isn't he? To the uppity woman who at some nebulous point had a bottle.

Hit her!

But all of this leads me away from my point ... and indeed the point of this thread.

It's all in the OP, for the slow learners.

This woman was interviewed by the media because of the violent blow to the head she received.

Are we all agreed on this?

Her name was published in that media.

Any questions?

From that name being published, her details ... her private address, her home and mobile numbers, her facebook, her email addies; the addresses and home and mobile numbers and their facebook accounts and emails were published.

All over the net.

I can find them, so easy is it do.

These details were published with implicit instructions to harass her and her family and friends with rape, graphic sexual violence and death threats.

It is astonishing to me that people on this forum are making excuses for this behaviour.

I have been told that, by virtue of pointing this out, i have been "pounded".

Gordy even started a poll on it.

Seriously. Who are you people? That you would focus on whether or not she "deserved" a punch to the head over what she has been put through as a result?

Who are you people?

Can you readers digest that for me?

As far as I am concerned the post melee internet harassment is abhorrent. The man hit her way too hard, it was not a king hit, she was there armed for a brawl an unfortunately got one. But in the heat of the moment... The story should have been about her treatment after the fray.

For what it's worth, a (not very hard) punch in the head should have been enough to make her see the folly of her actions, and that would be that.

But afterwards, she did what all SJW"s do - she doubled down. She willingly consented to media coverage with the intent of constructing a false narrative - it was this choice that cemented her status as an enemy of truth, thus proving that the mild dose of karmic retribution she had received was not enough, and another, stronger dose was about to be delivered. And delivered it was.

We can only wait in hope that this lesson is heeded. Let us hope she learns to shut out the voices of those who are all too willing to sacrifice her, so that they may live vicariously through her, or use her as nothing more than a pawn in their political games.

Nobody wants to see a young life completely ruined by a few bad choices. Well, nobody but leftists.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36832
Gender: female

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #466 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:25am

freediver wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:19am:

mothra wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:07am:

freediver wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:04am:

Quote:

Do you think she deserves to have her private details, her address, her email addies, her facebook .. and those of her friends and family .. all publicised with implicit instruction to threaten her with rape, graphic sexual violence and death, FD?

I don't know what she deserves, but I expect jail would be a fair option. She should definitely have her name and mug shot in the paper s people know to stay away from her at protests and the police know to be ready to get her.

Mothra, what do you think of people who turn up to other groups' protests with the express intention of using violence to disrupt them?

Rape her!

Mothra, what do you think of people who turn up to other groups' protests with the express intention of using violence to disrupt them?

I am noticing a pattern here. You are unwilling to criticise the Koran, sacrificing your principles of standing of for victims of domestic violence to your higher priority of defending Islam. You are also unwilling to criticise this violent, dirty woman. You seek out the most repulsive parts of society then find a way to take their side.

LOL at your terminology.

My question is FD, in case i have not been clear enough, does this woman deserve in some way to have all of her private details, and those of her friends and family, plastered all over the internet with implicit instructions to threaten her with rape, graphic sexual violence and death?

Whatever she did or didn't do FD.

Does she deserve that?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 36832 Gender:	Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis Reply #467 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:29am Oh good. Honky's here. That will sort everything out. Providing you're not a woman, a minority or left-wing that is.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #468 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:32am

... wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:22am:

Setanta wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 8:00am:

mothra wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 7:48am:

You can all argue all you like over who hit who and who had what coming.

Hell, you can even pull a Rhino and demand that only one definition from dictionary is valid, despite it listing more than that.

Go for it people. Explain away how she had a king hit coming to her. Did i say say king hit? Explain away how she had a punch in the head coming to her.

Talk about her past, while you're at it. All of the thing that she has done to make her her a less than "reputable" woman.

We won't mention the bio of the guy that punched her in the head. How he is a neo-Nazi and white supremacist who was less than honourably discharged from the marines after less than two weeks.

No. He' just reacting, isn't he? To the uppity woman who at some nebulous point had a bottle.

Hit her!

But all of this leads me away from my point ... and indeed the point of this thread.

It's all in the OP, for the slow learners.

This woman was interviewed by the media because of the violent blow to the head she received.

Are we all agreed on this?

Her name was published in that media.

Any questions?

From that name being published, her details ... her private address, her home and mobile numbers, her facebook, her email addies; the addresses and home and mobile numbers and their facebook accounts and emails were published.

All over the net.

I can find them, so easy is it do.

These details were published with implicit instructions to harass her and her family and friends with rape, graphic sexual violence and death threats.

It is astonishing to me that people on this forum are making excuses for this behaviour.

I have been told that, by virtue of pointing this out, i have been "pounded".

Gordy even started a poll on it.

Seriously. Who are you people? That you would focus on whether or not she "deserved" a punch to the head over what she has been put through as a result?

Who are you people?

Can you readers digest that for me?

As far as I am concerned the post melee internet harassment is abhorrent. The man hit her way too hard, it was not a king hit, she was there armed for a brawl an unfortunately got one. But in the heat of the moment... The story should have been about her treatment after the fray.

For what it's worth, a (not very hard) punch in the head should have been enough to make her see the folly of her actions, and that would be that.

But afterwards, she did what all SJW"s do - she doubled down. She willingly consented to media coverage with the intent of constructing a false narrative - it was this choice that cemented her status as an enemy of truth, thus proving that the mild dose of karmic retribution she had received was not enough, and another, stronger dose was about to be delivered. And delivered it was.

We can only wait in hope that this lesson is heeded. Let us hope she learns to shut out the voices of those who are all too willing to sacrifice her, so that they may live vicariously through her, or use her as nothing more than a pawn in their political games.

Nobody wants to see a young life completely ruined by a few bad choices. Well, nobody but leftists.

I am wondering if the same things would be said iof this had been two men or two women..

at the end of the day a street fight some of them armed with bottle and bats...is not a good look....

and as you say mostly young....

when people turn up armed to the teeth... get out thats my advice.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Online

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 53463
At my desk.

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #469 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:32am

Quote:

My question is FD, in case i have not been clear enough

You have been perfectly clear. Do you have a problem with my previous answer to the same question? Or do I need to get out the crayons for you?

Quote:

Whatever she did or didn't do FD.

Are you suggesting that what a person does is irrelevant to what they deserve?

Mothra, what do you think of people who turn up to other groups' protests with the express intention of using violence to disrupt them?

Am I right that like Islam, you feel compelled to defend this scum, despite knowing what she did was wrong?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36832
Gender: female

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #470 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:39am

freediver wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:32am:

Quote:

My question is FD, in case i have not been clear enough

You have been perfectly clear. Do you have a problem with my previous answer to the same question? Or do I need to get out the crayons for you?

Quote:

Whatever she did or didn't do FD.

Are you suggesting that what a person does is irrelevant to what they deserve?

Mothra, what do you think of people who turn up to other groups' protests with the express intention of using violence to disrupt them?

Am I right that like Islam, you feel compelled to defend this scum, despite knowing what she did was wrong?

FD... i know you're accustomed to bullying people into giving you the answers you demand. Just so you know, i don;t get bullied easily.

I would have thought you would have learned that by now. But nevermind, plug away. See where it gets you.

Now, do you think this woman deserved to have all of her private details made public? And those of her friends and family? To be threatened with rape, graphic sexual violence and death?

You seem reluctant to answer. Why is that?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Online www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 53463 At my desk.	Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis Reply #471 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:40am Are you having difficulty understanding the question Mothra? What do you think of people who turn up to other groups' protests with the express intention of using violence to disrupt them?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36832
Gender: female

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #472 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:43am

freediver wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:40am:

Are you having difficulty understanding the question Mothra?

What do you think of people who turn up to other groups' protests with the express intention of using violence to disrupt them?

No FD. I think it is you having difficulty understanding the question.

And seriously, it is in the OP. Get up to speed man.

Do you think it's ok to publicise a woman's private details, and those o her friends and family, with implicit instructions to threaten her with rape, graphic sexual violence and death?

Because i'm getting from you that you kinda do.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #473 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:44am

cods wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:32am:

... wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:22am:

Setanta wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 8:00am:

mothra wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 7:48am:

You can all argue all you like over who hit who and who had what coming.

Hell, you can even pull a Rhino and demand that only one definition from dictionary is valid, despite it listing more than that.

Go for it people. Explain away how she had a king hit coming to her. Did i say say king hit? Explain away how she had a punch in the head coming to her.

Talk about her past, while you're at it. All of the thing that she has done to make her her a less than "reputable" woman.

We won't mention the bio of the guy that punched her in the head. How he is a neo-Nazi and white supremacist who was less than honourably discharged from the marines after less than two weeks.

No. He' just reacting, isn't he? To the uppity woman who at some nebulous point had a bottle.

Hit her!

But all of this leads me away from my point ... and indeed the point of this thread.

It's all in the OP, for the slow learners.

This woman was interviewed by the media because of the violent blow to the head she received.

Are we all agreed on this?

Her name was published in that media.

Any questions?

From that name being published, her details ... her private address, her home and mobile numbers, her facebook, her email addies; the addresses and home and mobile numbers and their facebook accounts and emails were published.

All over the net.

I can find them, so easy is it do.

These details were published with implicit instructions to harass her and her family and friends with rape, graphic sexual violence and death threats.

It is astonishing to me that people on this forum are making excuses for this behaviour.

I have been told that, by virtue of pointing this out, i have been "pounded".

Gordy even started a poll on it.

Seriously. Who are you people? That you would focus on whether or not she "deserved" a punch to the head over what she has been put through as a result?

Who are you people?

Can you readers digest that for me?

As far as I am concerned the post melee internet harassment is abhorrent. The man hit her way too hard, it was not a king hit, she was there armed for a brawl an unfortunately got one. But in the heat of the moment... The story should have been about her treatment after the fray.

For what it's worth, a (not very hard) punch in the head should have been enough to make her see the folly of her actions, and that would be that.

But afterwards, she did what all SJW"s do - she doubled down. She willingly consented to media coverage with the intent of constructing a false narrative - it was this choice that cemented her status as an enemy of truth, thus proving that the mild dose of karmic retribution she had received was not enough, and another, stronger dose was about to be delivered. And delivered it was.

We can only wait in hope that this lesson is heeded. Let us hope she learns to shut out the voices of those who are all too willing to sacrifice her, so that they may live vicariously through her, or use her as nothing more than a pawn in their political games.

Nobody wants to see a young life completely ruined by a few bad choices. Well, nobody but leftists.

I am wondering if the same things would be said iof this had been two men or two women..

at the end of the day a street fight some of them armed with bottle and bats...is not a good look....

and as you say mostly young....

when people turn up armed to the teeth... get out thats my advice.

No, it wouldn't be the same, for a few reasons.

1. Heaps of males got beaten up there. But violence against males gets no traction, so its narrative-crafting value is nil.

2. Males are, in general, more receptive to the lessons of violence. A kindergarten age boy has more awareness of the repercussions of violence than adult females. They need to, as there are no white knights ready to bail them out if they pick fights they're sure to lose.

I'm not sure which cliched slogan fits this scenario best:

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes

or

Don't tempt fate.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Online www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 53463 At my desk.	Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis Reply #474 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:52am And the tapdancing continues. Once again, Mothra is afraid of her own opinion. Mothra, what do you think of people who turn up to other groups' protests with the express intention of using violence to disrupt them?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36832
Gender: female

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #475 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:56am

freediver wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 9:52am:

And the tapdancing continues.

Mothra, what do you think of people who turn up to other groups' protests with the express intention of using violence to disrupt them?

No tapdancing in the slightest. Well, except from you.

What are your thoughts on the OP, FD?

Do you think a woman deserves to have all of her private details, and those of her friends and family, publicised with the implicit suggestion to threaten her with rape, graphic sexual violence and death?

Because i'm seriously getting the feeling that you do.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36832
Gender: female

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #476 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 10:03am

I mean FD, knowing your propensity for porkies, i would say that you think that women who take part in protests that may or may not turn out to be violent deserve to be stalked and threatened with rape, graphic sexual violence and death.

Were i you and you were Gandalf, i would go so far as to say that women who take part in protests deserve to be raped.

Porkies, innit.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 22008
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #477 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 10:07am

mothra wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 7:48am:

You can all argue all you like over who hit who and who had what coming.

Hell, you can even pull a Rhino and demand that only one definition from dictionary is valid, despite it listing more than that.

Go for it people. Explain away how she had a king hit coming to her. Did i say say king hit? Explain away how she had a punch in the head coming to her.

Talk about her past, while you're at it. All of the thing that she has done to make her her a less than "reputable" woman.

We won't mention the bio of the guy that punched her in the head. How he is a neo-Nazi and white supremacist who was less than honourably discharged from the marines after less than two weeks.

No. He' just reacting, isn't he? To the uppity woman who at some nebulous point had a bottle.

Hit her!

But all of this leads me away from my point ... and indeed the point of this thread.

It's all in the OP, for the slow learners.

This woman was interviewed by the media because of the violent blow to the head she received.

Are we all agreed on this?

Her name was published in that media.

Any questions?

From that name being published, her details ... her private address, her home and mobile numbers, her facebook, her email addies; the addresses and home and mobile numbers and their facebook accounts and emails were hacked and published.

All over the net.

I can find them, so easy is it do.

These details were published with implicit instructions to harass her and her family and friends with rape, graphic sexual violence and death threats.

It is astonishing to me that people on this forum are making excuses for this behaviour.

I have been told that, by virtue of pointing this out, i have been "pounded".

Gordy even started a poll on it.

Seriously. Who are you people? That you would focus on whether or not she "deserved" a punch to the head over what she has been put through as a result?

Who are you people?

I don't believe I've seen anyone saying she DESERVED the punch. Just about everyone here is saying she was a willing participant in a violent street protest and those few frames of footage show her coming off second best.

She willing put herself in a situation where violence was a predictable outcome, and it happened.

Post punch,if she felt she was truly an innocent assaulted she should have quietly gone to the police with the footage and perused the assailant through legal means.

But no, she did an interview and the consensus is she lied by playing the poor innocent victim, and starting a fund raising campaign.

She tried to use social media to further her cause, but just like the punch in the head, she came off second best.

Did she deserve any of the above, well I don't like bad things to happen to anyone.
Is she the author of what happened, yup. She's a player and got played.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36832
Gender: female

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #478 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 10:10am

Gordon wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 10:07am:

mothra wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 7:48am:

You can all argue all you like over who hit who and who had what coming.

Hell, you can even pull a Rhino and demand that only one definition from dictionary is valid, despite it listing more than that.

Go for it people. Explain away how she had a king hit coming to her. Did i say say king hit? Explain away how she had a punch in the head coming to her.

Talk about her past, while you're at it. All of the thing that she has done to make her her a less than "reputable" woman.

We won't mention the bio of the guy that punched her in the head. How he is a neo-Nazi and white supremacist who was less than honourably discharged from the marines after less than two weeks.

No. He' just reacting, isn't he? To the uppity woman who at some nebulous point had a bottle.

Hit her!

But all of this leads me away from my point ... and indeed the point of this thread.

It's all in the OP, for the slow learners.

This woman was interviewed by the media because of the violent blow to the head she received.

Are we all agreed on this?

Her name was published in that media.

Any questions?

From that name being published, her details ... her private address, her home and mobile numbers, her facebook, her email addies; the addresses and home and mobile numbers and their facebook accounts and emails were hacked and published.

All over the net.

I can find them, so easy is it do.

These details were published with implicit instructions to harass her and her family and friends with rape, graphic sexual violence and death threats.

It is astonishing to me that people on this forum are making excuses for this behaviour.

I have been told that, by virtue of pointing this out, i have been "pounded".

Gordy even started a poll on it.

Seriously. Who are you people? That you would focus on whether or not she "deserved" a punch to the head over what she has been put through as a result?

Who are you people?

I don't believe I've seen anyone saying she DESERVED the punch. Just about everyone here is saying she was a willing participant in a violent street protest and those few frames of footage show her coming off second best.

She willing put herself in a situation where violence was a predictable outcome, and it happened.

Post punch,if she felt she was truly an innocent assaulted she should have quietly gone to the police with the footage and perused the assailant through legal means.

But no, she did an interview and the consensus is she lied by playing the poor innocent victim, and starting a fund raising campaign.

She tried to use social media to further her cause, but just like the punch in the head, she came off second best.

Did she deserve any of the above, well I don't like bad things to happen to anyone.
Is she the author of what happened, yup. She's a player and got played.

But she started the "gofundme" AFTER the threats. As has already been pointed out to you.

Nice try Gory, but no cigar.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 22008
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Woman king-hit then stalked by neo-Nazis
Reply #479 - Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 10:15am

mothra wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 10:10am:

Gordon wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 10:07am:

mothra wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2017 at 7:48am:

You can all argue all you like over who hit who and who had what coming.

Hell, you can even pull a Rhino and demand that only one definition from dictionary is valid, despite it listing more than that.

Go for it people. Explain away how she had a king hit coming to her. Did i say say king hit? Explain away how she had a punch in the head coming to her.

Talk about her past, while you're at it. All of the thing that she has done to make her her a less than "reputable" woman.

We won't mention the bio of the guy that punched her in the head. How he is a neo-Nazi and white supremacist who was less than honourably discharged from the marines after less than two weeks.

No. He' just reacting, isn't he? To the uppity woman who at some nebulous point had a bottle.

Hit her!

But all of this leads me away from my point ... and indeed the point of this thread.

It's all in the OP, for the slow learners.

This woman was interviewed by the media because of the violent blow to the head she received.

Are we all agreed on this?

Her name was published in that media.

Any questions?

From that name being published, her details ... her private address, her home and mobile numbers, her facebook, her email addies; the addresses and home and mobile numbers and their facebook accounts and emails were hacked and published.

All over the net.

I can find them, so easy is it do.

These details were published with implicit instructions to harass her and her family and friends with rape, graphic sexual violence and death threats.

It is astonishing to me that people on this forum are making excuses for this behaviour.

I have been told that, by virtue of pointing this out, i have been "pounded".

Gordy even started a poll on it.

Seriously. Who are you people? That you would focus on whether or not she "deserved" a punch to the head over what she has been put through as a result?

Who are you people?

I don't believe I've seen anyone saying she DESERVED the punch. Just about everyone here is saying she was a willing participant in a violent street protest and those few frames of footage show her coming off second best.

She willing put herself in a situation where violence was a predictable outcome, and it happened.

Post punch,if she felt she was truly an innocent assaulted she should have quietly gone to the police with the footage and perused the assailant through legal means.

But no, she did an interview and the consensus is she lied by playing the poor innocent victim, and starting a fund raising campaign.

She tried to use social media to further her cause, but just like the punch in the head, she came off second best.

Did she deserve any of the above, well I don't like bad things to happen to anyone.
Is she the author of what happened, yup. She's a player and got played.

But she started the "gofundme" AFTER the threats. As has already been pointed out to you.

Nice try Gory, but no cigar.

The lies in the interview. Seriously. She's a member of a group of violent street thugs who's stock and trade is violence.

Did you bother to listen to the Tim Pool interview where the Antifa member produced a knife?

The punch should have just been a badge of honour. I bet AntiFa members brag about their war wounds.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Who copped a bigger hiding
AntiFa Girl 0 (0.0%) OP of this thread 5 (100.0%) Total votes: 5 « Created by: Gordon on: Apr 21^st, 2017 at 8:54pm »