Gordon wrote on Apr 20
th, 2017 at 1:48pm:
mothra wrote on Apr 20
th, 2017 at 1:28pm:
No. it's not. You seem to think that as "uncovered meat" she deserved to have pornographic images used violently against her .. and for them to be sent to her mother, other family members and friends.
Do you think she intended for those images to be used in that way?
Do you think her intentions matter?
You seem to think she had it coming, because she is/was a sex worker. All of the rape threats and suggestions of graphic sexual violence. Coming to her private residence. Over her private phone numbers.
So, do you think sex workers can be raped? Or as "uncovered meat" of ill-repute, they deserve what they get?
You're copping such a shellacking you're now sounding absurd.
She stuck her head up as a target for trolls with her crowd funding stunt. Her porno photos are on an open website with no paywall, no passwords. In 2017, sorry but that's inevitable.
As for the rape question, doesn't even deserve an answer.
Wrong again. Don't you tire of it?
The crowd-funding cropped up as a result of the harassment and publishing of her private details. She needs to relocate and change her name, so bad has it got.
As for a shellacking. LOL! The day you, Rhino and Cods phase me will be a cold day in hell.
A shellacking is what Sad Kangaroo gave you and your ilk in the racism thread. And what a thing of beauty it was.
And the only reason you don't want to answer my question is because it would expose what a grubby little man you really are. Not that there was much doubt.