Gordon wrote on Apr 20
th, 2017 at 12:13pm:
mothra wrote on Apr 20
th, 2017 at 12:08pm:
Gordon wrote on Apr 20
th, 2017 at 12:05pm:
She plays with violent anarchists and got biffed.
She'd have happily dished it out if she was able.
Seriously, who gives a fig. Oh I know who does. A boring click click click slactivist.
Why would you care that a piece of "uncovered meat" gets her name, address, phone numbers and place of employment plastered all over the internet with implicit instruction to threaten her with rape, graphic sexual violence and death?
She asked for it, right?
Why did you leap from what I said about the punch to all the rest?
You're a lair, and you're under seige in this thread.
You backed a member of a
violent anarchist group
and you're digging your heels in. Just chalk this one up as an honourable loss, like the FGM/CUTTING incident.
I'm not even remotely "under siege". You people are appalling. I have no qualms effortlessly telling you so.
My point, from the OP, has been that as a result of her getting king-hit and her name publicised, she has been the vicim of a relentless, sensationalised campaign.
Once again for the slow learners:
Her address, home and mobile numbers, place of employment and the phone numbers of her friend and family have been circulated online with implicit instructions to harass her with threats of rape, graphic sexual assault and death.
For a number of very interesting reasons, certain people in this thread choose not to comment on that, rather focusing on what she did to provoke it.
I am simply saying nothing justifies the treatment she has received. This is being met with tremendous resistance.
I think you people should seriously question yourselves.