Karnal wrote on Jun 20
th, 2019 at 12:33pm:
I have a political science background, Rich. I know that there's no way a US administration could pull off a major attack against its own people only 8 months after coming to power.
The Russians, on the other hand, are much more efficient. Back in 1999, Putin managed to pull off bombings all over Moscow to get himself elected as president. A precedent?
There is no way a family like the Bushes would follow an ex-KGB chief's lead. And if Sept 11 wasn't carried out by the Bushes, then who?
Your conspiracy requires the silence and complicity not only of the Bush family, but the multiple US agencies and private operators you claim we're in on it. It would also require the previous Clinton administration, who would have had to have been in on the planning of an event of such scale.
So scientifically, no worries. Politically?
Impossible.
OSB said it was the "shadow government" in Washington which was responsible. The funding was from Saudi - thats pretty much confirmed. The dancing Mossad "art students" were very suspicious.
However the official conspiracy theory of 19 Arab hijackers is nonsense - since half of them are still alive. Don't you think? And there is no real evidence that they were even on board those planes. No piece of wreckage has been found with the serial numbers on them identifying the aircraft.
Just think of the coincidences that day. 4 aircraft were hijacked in the most heavily defended airspace in the World. Even though the gov was warned by the investigation called "Abel Danger". All airport video cameras were switched off that day and exercises were being carried out that day of hijacked aircraft.
There has never been a steel framed building collapse primarily through fire before or since 9/11 - yet 3 fell that day. The third plane hit the Pentagon precisely where an investigation was being carried out into a missing 2.3 trillion.
Thats just the start of the number of coincidences.