we can see the usual suspects staying away from evidences ..

just more inane banter from them , poor souls

Major Drop/USMC/Fema 3

it_is_the_light wrote on Mar 20^th, 2018 at 4:29pm:


Yes, beloved, the ID known as Rich Dude is certainly staying away from Uranium One.

Read the tactics, dear ones. When evidences are presented:

1. Stay away until the coast's clear.
2. Cover it up with Clickbait spam.
3. Accuse these dear ones of retardationalisticism.
4. Pretend they're staying away from fake Clickbait evidences.

All is in accordance with the DP.

Here you go Karnal!

This is about the SES - Senior Executive Service. Salaries start at the Vice Presidents salary, 9-10,000 people, politically motivated to serve the interests of the shadow gov. Swamp creatures - all!

All you don't want to know is here.

Republicans Preparing to Drain the Swap, of Trump!

Representative Trey Gowdy, during an appearance on “Fox News Sunday,” had some strong advice for John Dowd, an attorney of President Donald Trump’s who has called for an end to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference.

“If you have an innocent client, Mr. Dowd, act like it,” Gowdy said. “The President’s attorney frankly does him a disservice when he says that.”

Mueller’s investigation isn’t limited to possible Russian collusion with the Trump campaign, Gowdy noted, adding that the investigation is also examining Russian interference with the entire U.S. democratic process and the 2016 presidential election.

“If the allegation is collusion with the Russians, and there is no evidence of that, and you are innocent of that, act like it,” Gowdy said.

Gowdy, who is chairman of the House Oversight Committee and sits on the Intelligence and Judiciary committees, added later, “If you’ve done nothing wrong, you should want the investigation to be as fulsome and thorough as possible.”

Gowdy wasn’t alone in his criticisms. Senator Lindsey Graham, another prominent South Carolina Republican, addressed possibilities that the president could fire the special counsel during an interview on CNN.

“As I said before, if he tried to do that, that would be the beginning of the end of his presidency,” Graham said on CNN’s “State of the Union,” adding that, despite Trump’s criticisms, Mueller is doing “a good job.”

“I think it’s very important he be allowed to do his job without interference and there are many Republicans who share my view,” Graham said. “The only reason Mr. Mueller could ever be dismissed is for cause. I see no cause when it comes to Mr. Mueller.”

He continued: “I pledge to the American people as a Republican, to ensure that Mr. Mueller can continue to do his job without any interference.”



As recently as last month, Gowdy said the much-debated Nunes memo, which alleges abuses of covert surveillance powers by the FBI, does not vindicate Donald Trump, and that it will not have “any impact on the Russia probe.”

Gowdy made the comments while speaking to CBS’s Margaret Brennan during an appearance on Face the Nation.

“I actually don’t think it has any impact on the Russia probe for this reason––” Gowdy said.

“The memo has no impact on the Russia probe?” Brennan interjected.

“No— not to me, it doesn’t — and I was pretty integrally involved in the drafting of it. There is a Russia investigation without a dossier. So to the extent the memo deals with the dossier and the FISA process, the dossier has nothing to do with the meeting at Trump Tower,” Gowdy said. “The dossier has nothing to do with an email sent by Cambridge Analytica. The dossier really has nothing to do with George Papadopoulos’ meeting in Great Britain. It also doesn’t have anything to do with obstruction of justice. So there’s going to be a Russia probe, even without a dossier.”



As for Trump's claims,

"A total WITCH HUNT with massive conflicts of interest!"

Given that nineteen people have been charged with felonies as a result of the investigations and five have have pleaded guilty, including four Trump insiders (so far) and are they are cooperating it's obvious why Trump is getting scared and trying to stop the investigation.  They're closing in on his illegal activity and cover ups.

If there was a Richter scale for CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT, Trump would be at an 8.0.

Karnal wrote on Mar 21^st, 2018 at 11:28am:


The Uranium One deal was sweetened by a 150 million transfer to the Clinton Foundation from Russia as well as Bill was given 500 thousand for a 3/4 hour speech in Moscow.

So tell me Dear one why did Russia pay this money? I'm curious!

BTW: You evaded the video which was about the deep state. Please be attentive - this information should be mandatory.

Richdude wrote on Mar 21^st, 2018 at 1:13pm:


I've told you all this. You're playing tactic 4: ask the same questions again.

Russia never paid the Clinton Foundation anything. The Uranium One founder was South African and a good friend of Bill Clinton. He donated the majority of those millions well before Hillary was Secretary of State. The money was donated long before the Russian energy giant Rostadom took over 51% of Uranium One.

Bill Clinton got paid to give speeches by all sorts of foreign companies. He's an ex-president. His agent does the deals.

But I'm curious. Why would anyone donate to someone's charitable foundation when they have no ability to give them what they want? Could it be that those millions were handed over simply as charitable donations and tax write-offs?

And yes, just as the Secretary of State has no power over uranium sales or company mergers, the Clintons don't even have access to the money in the Clinton Foundation.

This has all been proved. Unless you have something to add, Rich, I think it's time you accepted the truth and moved on.

And so it goes.

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/379380-house-judiciary-chair-expected-to...

House Judiciary Chair expected to issue DOJ subpoena over Clinton emails as soon as this week

BY OLIVIA BEAVERS AND KATIE BO WILLIAMS - 03/20/18 04:14 PM EDT



The head of the House Judiciary Committee is expected to subpoena the Department of Justice (DOJ) as soon as this week to obtain documents related to how the FBI handled its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server, The Hill has learned.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) have been leading a joint probe into what the two lawmakers say may be evidence of political bias in the highest levels at the Justice Department.
While one source with direct knowledge of the matter cautioned that the exact timeline was still murky, multiple sources told The Hill that they expect the summons to go out Wednesday or Thursday.

The chairman on Monday notified the ranking Democrat, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), that a subpoena is forthcoming, a spokesperson separately confirmed.
Under Judiciary committee rules, the chairman must consult the ranking member two business days “before issuing any subpoena” — suggesting that the move is imminent.

Republicans have become increasingly frustrated over the past couple months at what they say is the lagging pace in which the DOJ has turned over documents from the inspector general’s concurrent probe into the 2016 presidential election. GOP lawmakers say they’ve received only a small fraction of the records they want to obtain — approximately 3,000 out of 1.2 million documents.

Goodlatte has been under tremendous pressure from conservatives in his own committee to pick up the pace of the investigation. On Sunday, he threatened to subpoena the law enforcement agency “soon” if it did not turn over the documents the committee is seeking.

“We need to have those documents,” Goodlatte told host Maria Bartiromo on Fox News's “Sunday Morning Futures.”

“We've had communications with the Department of Justice about this and they know that not just myself and Chairman Gowdy, but many other members of the House are very concerned about the slow nature of those documents being produced. And as I say, actions are going to have to take a new level here very soon,” he said.

It remains unclear which officials the subpoena will target. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment.

Lawmakers have privately buzzed since last week that the chairman was preparing a subpoena, suggesting they have no other choice but to issue a summons for the records that they say they want to review before interviewing additional witnesses.

“I would hope that we wouldn’t have to compel them to comply, but more and more evidence would suggest that compelling them to deliver documents may be our only recourse,” Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), the head of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, told The Hill.

“He’s a cautious guy, so to get to this point ought to tell you something,” Gowdy said Tuesday, referring to Goodlatte.

A spokesperson for the chairman declined to comment on the timeline.

“No news yet,” Goodlatte said Tuesday, before heading into the House chamber.

Since launching the investigation in late October, the committee has interviewed two FBI officials as part of the probe.

Gowdy insisted Monday that the subpoena decision was up to Goodlatte, saying that he has allowed the veteran lawmaker to take the lead.

“In my judgment, he’s the chairman of the Judiciary. He has primary jurisdiction. I’ll let him take the lead. I mean, I support them 1000 percent, but they shouldn’t need to hear from both of us,” he told The Hill.

Democrats have dismissed the joint investigation as nothing more than political theater, accusing their Republican colleagues of seeking to distract from or undermine special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia's election meddling and President Trump's campaign.

DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz has separately been examining the FBI and DOJ’s actions in the Clinton probe since January 2017. While Horowitz has floated March or April for his report's release date, it's unclear whether he's committed to that timeline.

But GOP lawmakers are chomping at the bit to learn more about what Horowitz has uncovered regarding the private text messages between FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who disparaged then-candidate Donald Trump and other political figures during the 2016 presidential election.

The messages have become a flash point for Republicans because Strzok and Page were involved in two high-profile probes: the Clinton email investigation and the beginnings of Mueller’s Russia probe.

Strzok served as the No. 2 in the Clinton investigation, and his reported role in drafting the Clinton exoneration letter ignited an explosion of GOP scrutiny.

Both FBI officials served on Mueller’s team before an internal investigation uncovered their text messages, leading to their prompt removal from the high-profile probe that is investigating whether the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin, as well as other potential crimes.